obviously. if you're doing a CD and record, you have to master your
tracks twice, because mastering to CD and vinyl are two vastly
different things. in this way, I prefer digital, because you're
having to master your way around the limitations of the vinyl
that's true joe, i think peop
om: David Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/06/24 Fri PM 12:30:47 EDT
> To: robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 313 Org <313@hyperreal.org>
> Subject: Re: (313) Re: legit mp3 downloads
>
> Yes, recently playing at a little house party, what I no
Yes, recently playing at a little house party, what I noticed was that
playing direct off my laptop has a different tone quality - basically,
there are a lot more highs present on the laptop tracks than on the
vinyl. It easy easy enough to EQ the sound system a little so that the
laptop sounds
-Original Message-
From: /0 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 June 2005 00:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (313) Re: legit mp3 downloads
no club or venue has a system that will allow the lsitener (outside of
the
lack of record noise) to
But I almost always buy records because of the music, barely have
in mind the club/DJ tool concept, and 98% of the time I am listenin to
them in my home stereo. So it is important they sound good there.
yeah fair point. me too.
my home setup is even worse tho :)
i also think that people's e
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 09:55:50AM +0100, robin wrote:
> >May I be annoying, and raise a technical point here?
> >
> >Digitalised music is always an "approximation", so I prefer to stick
> >with "the real thing" and keep my vinyl.
> >In a decent sound system anyone can tell the difference when
> >c
hi guilherme,
i have never tried this way, i usually just digitalise in 320kbit/44100 Hz
what is the result you want to obtain? a higher definition of sound? you
might want to try FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec -
http://flac.sourceforge.net/)
fab.
- Original Message -
From: "Guilher
May I be annoying, and raise a technical point here?
Digitalised music is always an "approximation", so I prefer to stick
with "the real thing" and keep my vinyl.
In a decent sound system anyone can tell the difference when
comparing the "real thing" with .wav, .mp3 or any other standard
digital
TECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: (313) Re: legit mp3 downloads
wasn't mastering to cheapo cassette one of the basic channel "Secrets"?
On Jun 23, 2005, at 20:56, /0 wrote:
funny you mention this... I used to dump tra
wasn't mastering to cheapo cassette one of the basic channel "Secrets"?
On Jun 23, 2005, at 20:56, /0 wrote:
funny you mention this... I used to dump tracks to VCR tapes.
sometimes you get the head flutter which is kinda nice :)
--
matt kane's brain
http://hydrogenproject.com
aim -> mkbatwerk
funny you mention this... I used to dump tracks to VCR tapes. sometimes you
get the head flutter which is kinda nice :)
-Joe
- Original Message -
From: "z66" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 8:33 PM
Subject: R
Tim Moore wrote:
*Everything* is an approximation! I'm pretty sure those pops and
crackles weren't on the master! ;-)
exactly! and vinyl master also got its restrictions.. although i really
dig the sound of cut grooves as well as that on thick chrome tapes --
you can even record your MP3 on
*Everything* is an approximation! I'm pretty sure those pops and
crackles weren't on the master! ;-)
On Jun 23, 2005, at 3:43 PM, Guilherme Menegon Arantes wrote:
May I be annoying, and raise a technical point here?
Digitalised music is always an "approximation", so I prefer to stick
with "t
no club or venue has a system that will allow the lsitener (outside of the
lack of record noise) to differentiate between a 320k mp3 and a record.
if there is one, I'd like to go there and enjoy some 320k mp3s
- Original Message -
From: "Guilherme Menegon Arantes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
14 matches
Mail list logo
