Re: (313) production and mastering (Juan Atkins)

2003-02-07 Thread spw
Juan Atkins likes to use romplers, you can hear it in his music although he does an exceptional job at it. Romplers seem to have no problem achieving that smooth-Roland type sound. Kevin Saunderson insisted on only using a real TR-808 back in the techno heyday of the late 80's but that's a sound y

RE: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread logic7
[EMAIL PROTECTED] go to yahoogroups.com and sign up for the list from there. -Original Message- From: ::) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 6:29 PM To: 313@hyperreal.org Cc: Ralf Gill Subject: Re: (313) production and mastering can someone provide ralf with

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread ::\)
t if you'd like me to elaborate -Joe - Original Message - From: "Ralf Gill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 3:29 PM Subject: RE: (313) production and mastering > yeah..whats a rompler, u mean using a pc cards

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread ::\)
6 PM Subject: RE: (313) production and mastering > whats the address for this list please? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 6:15 a.m. > To: spw; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org > Subject: Re: (31

RE: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread logic7
rompler= sample playback synth, like a Roland JV/XV, E-Mu Proteus, Korg N-series/Trinity/01D, etc. -Original Message- From: Ralf Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 3:29 PM To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) production and mastering yeah..whats a

RE: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread Ralf Gill
yeah..whats a rompler, u mean using a pc cards rom to process and sample? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2003 3:50 p.m. To: spw Cc: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) production and mastering Far be it for me to enter

RE: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread logic7
ebruary 06, 2003 11:44 AM To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) production and mastering - Original Message -- From: "scotto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >but I really think it come down to money, >when you can almost buy a whole Pro T

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread r3dshift
this is off topic. I wouldn't really care except that its turning into a marathon thread, and based on what I've read thus far, its less mastering tips and more arguing about protools and how to sound like someone else sounded 10 years ago (aka "old school") I know there is a 313 production list

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
- Original Message -- From: "scotto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >but I really think it come down to money, >when you can almost buy a whole Pro Tools studio for the price of one studer >16 track deck. thats all it comes down to. i really really wanted to record to

RE: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread Wibo Lammerts
that's so true W -Original Message- From: Alex Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 6 februari 2003 17:01 To: spw; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) production and mastering possibly, but fatboy slim sucks ab - Original Message -

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread robin pinning
> possibly, but fatboy slim sucks agreed. you don't need much kit to make techno records. steve poindexter's 'work that muthaf**ker' was completely made on a Casio RZ1 it's imagination that counts robin... > > I read somewhere Fatboy Slim still uses (or at least did on his first > > album)

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread Alex Bates
possibly, but fatboy slim sucks ab - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "spw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 2:32 AM Subject: Re: (313) production and mastering > > > I read somewhere Fatbo

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread Graham_Bergdahl
I read somewhere Fatboy Slim still uses (or at least did on his first album) Notator on an Atari ST. G. spw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/02/2003 15:10:55 To: cc: <313@hyperreal.org> Subject: Re: (313) production and mastering In a couple of years I probably still be using

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread spw
techno-y about >> using Unix to do >> music!! Call it the geek quotient...;-) >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "House of Suki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Sakari Karipuro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313"

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread robin pinning
i like the look of thatas soon as i've sorted the Alsa stuff i think i should try it out. cheers robin... > > I wanted to use linux for production, but It didn't have the software I want > looking for. until I wrote it. :) > > http://www.filter24.org/seq24/ >

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread rob buse
OTECTED]> >To: "Sakari Karipuro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313" ><313@hyperreal.org> >Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:48 PM >Subject: RE: (313) production and mastering > > >> The protools that comes with the digi001 (not the free one) support

RE: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread Sakari Karipuro
House of Suki wrote on Thu, 6 Feb 2003 about following: > $300/hour studio obsolete for dance music producers. Once Windows is taken > out of the picture and companies get a little initiative (how about a custom > Linux distro for Cubase ala final scratch?) we will see the true advent of Custom

RE: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread Jongsma, K.J.
- > From: "House of Suki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Sakari Karipuro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313" > <313@hyperreal.org> > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:48 PM > Subject: RE: (313) production and mastering > > > > The p

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread Andrew
--- Original Message - From: "House of Suki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sakari Karipuro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313" <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:48 PM Subject: RE: (313) production and mastering > The protools that comes

RE: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread House of Suki
ent of the home studio. -raph -Original Message- From: Sakari Karipuro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 8:30 AM To: 313 Subject: Re: (313) production and mastering spw wrote on Thu, 6 Feb 2003 about following: > No offence, but it sounds like you have n

RE: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread logic7
t: Re: (313) production and mastering spw wrote on Thu, 6 Feb 2003 about following: > No offence, but it sounds like you have never used Pro Tools. > There is the free version at digidesign's web site if you want to become > more familiarized with the software. http://www.digidesi

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread Sakari Karipuro
spw wrote on Thu, 6 Feb 2003 about following: > No offence, but it sounds like you have never used Pro Tools. > There is the free version at digidesign's web site if you want to become > more familiarized with the software. http://www.digidesign.com/ seems that it still is win98/me only on window

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread spw
No offence, but it sounds like you have never used Pro Tools. There is the free version at digidesign's web site if you want to become more familiarized with the software. http://www.digidesign.com/ To me you you cant blame what your describing on 'over-production' it's more like 'over-processing'

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread jurren baars
i've always been told to step away from my work when painting, to avoid 'overproducing' it. at some point the work is done, and by adding more to it, or trying to make things look better, the overall picture will loose it's identity, it's soul. isn't this the same thing that happens when you

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread Graham_Bergdahl
--- Graham Bergdahl 06/02/2003 09:03 To: spw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Re: (313) production and mastering (Document link: Graham Bergdahl) Can anyone share any good Compressor settings? Particulary for Kicks and B-lines. I use Cubase SX and Waves Com

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread scotto
I would argue that most people using pro tools are using the LE version which is very limited in it's effect. once you get a TDM or Mix 24 there are so many more digital effect you can use. but lets not forget you can still use all you analog effect you just have to route a signal through them and

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread Andrew . Hodgson
Far be it for me to enter into a 'debate', but I didn't assert that Pro-Tools performs composition. However it can have a decisive effect on 'sound'. This is due to numerous factors, such as the A/D converters used (Digidesign, MOTU, Apogee etc.) and the software itself, i.e. the TDM system of

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread spw
Pro Tools is really no difeerant that usin a hardware sequencer, it's not going to compose tracks for you. Most of today's vynil is either from a CD or DAT master Pro Tools is only going to make your master sound better if your using it properly, buy some nice analog outbourd gear, if you want some

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread Andrew . Hodgson
I'm sorry, but I'm not blaming anything on Pro-Tools, it's the people using it with no imagination, a different point. When a producer stops using his/her brain and lets Pro-Tools take over their sound, then we get the situation we have now, with lots of boring tracks - but this is so obvious t

Re: (313) production and mastering

2003-02-06 Thread spw
On the subject of production and mastering I can see what Adrew is trying to say with the way today's techno and tech-house sounds but that has more to do with the production aspect of today's music, the types of effects and sounds people are using in tracks, you really cant blame it on ProTools wh