as always Tristan you really do have a nice way with words :)Thanks man!
and thanks for all that came and made it a great nite! We will be back on a
Fri/Sat in another 3 months so look out..
Cheers
Ian
-Original Message-
From: Phonopsia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 June 2003 03:48
"if you can makle"
I'll get me coat ;0)
-Original Message-
From: ian cheshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 June 2003 23:29
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) Technology Nite
Hi all UK 313ers, if you can makle this it would be
nice to see you all again after the Bleep43 party on
humans are slow and briliant, machines are stupid and fast, together they can
achieve great things... Albert Einstein (well... it's not exactly that way, but
that's the point :P)
> CONGRADULATIONS!
>
>
> you just made me feel stupid. didn't Mr. Kasparov beat the computer in
> the
> second rou
From: Mike Taylor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: [313] technology vs. art
>
> Hello,
>
>
> >>>Admirers of the human brain were disappoint
51 I believe. ;)
Take care,
Mike
From: Phonopsia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mike Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] technology vs. art
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 09:37:40 -0500
- Original Message -
From:
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 2:22 AM
Subject: Re: [313] technology vs. art
> Do you want to die of a heart attack
s us 'till today.
And yes, there will be machine art. In a couple decades it will be
indistinguishable from human art.
The central driving force in the universe will always be soul(will). Our
machines will have soul one day, one day our machines will be
indistinguishable from ourselves.
t ASIMO is supposed to stand to Advanced Step in Innovative
Mobility but the coincidence is startling.
MEK
From: Glyph1001 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] technology vs. art
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 03:33:56 -0500
Speak of the devi
is as I've heard
he's fascinated by the point where human and android/robot merge.
MEK
From: Glyph1001 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] technology vs. art
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 03:33:56 -0500
Speak of the devilits a
MAN, or rather HUMAN.
And no, we have no technology in my country but we still make some
gorgeous ART, that people still envies us 'till today.
From: "laura gavoor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] technology vs. art
Date: Wed
#x27;till today.
From: "laura gavoor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] technology vs. art
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 18:19:13
In the very same mindset
-Jimi Hendrix re-wired and re-thought how to record his music so he could
get his g
an is still the most
important...i think the lack of creativity is a product of our
society...we're over saturated...we've burned our selves out...
simply
b
- Original Message -
From: "laura gavoor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hy
:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 313@hyperreal.org
cc:(bcc: James Bucknell/Magazines/Hearst)
Subject: Re: [313] technology vs. art
In the very same mindset
-Jimi Hendrix re-wired and re-thought how to record his music so he could
get his guitar to sound like the music that was in his hea
In the very same mindset
-Jimi Hendrix re-wired and re-thought how to record his music so he could
get his guitar to sound like the music that was in his head.
-Similarly the Detroit boyz took traditional gear and re-wired/re-thought it
to develop the early tech soundz that kick-started (
| -Original Message-
| From: laura gavoor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 6:19 PM
|
| A. Will ever-elevating recording technology equally elevate
| imagination or have the opposite effect...or both??
Both, I reckon. The leap of imagination that was "Acid Tr
Ken Ishii flipped the on/off switch on his Korg repeatedly until it started
making weird noises... then he used it that way to make Jelly Tones
From: "James Bucknell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "laura gavoor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: R
At 18:19 31/10/2001 +, laura gavoor wrote:
Let's pose this as a question cuz I'm interested in peeps thoughts:
A. Will ever-elevating recording technology equally elevate imagination
or have the opposite effect...or both??
B. If bothhow then does one gage or distinguish true musicia
old
times...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 9:59 PM
To:Cyclone Wehner; 313 Detroit
Subject: Re: [313] technology
he is dropping is own version of Get Ur Freak On but it's still
cool nonetheless.
ne Wehner; 313 Detroit
> Subject: Re: [313] technology
>
> he is dropping is own version of Get Ur Freak On but it's still
> cool nonetheless.
>
> his supposed lack of humor is a common misconception, it seems. he
> once opened a set in minneapolis with the entirety of S
1 9:59 PM
> To: Cyclone Wehner; 313 Detroit
> Subject: Re: [313] technology
>
> he is dropping is own version of Get Ur Freak On but it's still
> cool nonetheless.
>
> his supposed lack of humor is a common misconception, it seems. he
> once opened a set in m
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 22:37:15 -0700
From: MARC DOUGLAS CHRISTENSEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kent williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] technology
Kent-
would you forward my reply to the list? my last several p
DJxDJ = Daniel Miller (Mute) + Seth Hodder (NovaMute).
Great DEMF set...it started slow, but REALLY hit a groove once it built up.
I think a lot of people drifted off before it kicked in and missed a good
thing. When the set started I was standing with Carlos S...when I saw him
later he said he
I always believed Richie has humour, his Plastikman persona showed that, I
just know that Richie said in an interview I read in Jockey Slut (?) that he
was never into hip-hop, so I am intrigued and happy to see how the divide
between techno/house/electronic music and 'urban music' is closing.
I th
it wasn't a dis... i like that song, personally. was just pointing
out that the version he's got in his computer is not the version
you'll hear on the radio or anywhere else.
At 3:16 PM +1000 10/21/01, hunter baby wrote:
maybe i'm still getting it all wrong - but is it still cool to diss
come
maybe i'm still getting it all wrong - but is it still cool to diss
comeone because they drop a particularly (allegedly), 'uncool' track
in an otherwise groovy set?
i didn't think it mattered if it was pulled off. if it was good - it
was good. no?
peace.
hanta (:
Original message from: [EMAIL P
he is dropping is own version of Get Ur Freak On but it's still
cool nonetheless.
his supposed lack of humor is a common misconception, it seems. he
once opened a set in minneapolis with the entirety of Stairway To
Heaven - and i mean the whole damn song. the party was called
Stairway
Hey Jeff,
I think you are referring to Mute Records founder Daniel Miller. I believe
it is Daniel Miller and a partner whose name escapes me, at the DEMF they
were playing a set that consisted of deconstructed songs from the Mute
catalogue. I have an .mpg interview with Liz Copeland on a cdr aroun
Wow ... I wasn't trying to read all that into the definitions. Just
putting the fragile nature of such terms in perspective, now that a
decade's gone by. "Techno" = "Detroit Techno" only holding for two
years (88-90) seems like so little time now.
-d
At 11:43 PM -0500 10/19/01, Kent williams
]>; "M. Todd Smith"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 6:43 AM
Subject: Re: [313] technology
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Dan Sicko wrote:
> > >>Trance in its roots was a marketing tool to identify techno with
melody
> >
&
| -Original Message-
| From: Dan Sicko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: 20 October 2001 04:11
|
| >>Trance in its roots was a marketing tool to identify techno with melody
|
| That's a real shame that the definition of "techno" had degraded that
| quickly in the early 90s, don't you think?
Kent-
would you forward my reply to the list? my last several posts haven't gone
through. thanks, -marc
the inestimable Kent williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well real Detroit techno was over before it started in some respects.
>Kind of like the Velvet Underground -- by the time anyone p
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Dan Sicko wrote:
> >>Trance in its roots was a marketing tool to identify techno with melody
>
> That's a real shame that the definition of "techno" had degraded that
> quickly in the early 90s, don't you think?
>
Well real Detroit techno was over before it started in some r
ant to see. Educate the
narrow minds, they feel what they want to feel." - Narra Mine - Genacide II
>> -Original Message-
>> From:DJ Entropy [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent:Friday, October 19, 2001 2:52 AM
>> To: Cyclone Wehner; 313 Detroit
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sicko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Phonopsia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "M. Todd Smith"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: [313] technology
&g
and i wanna hear how experimental and techno your spinning happy hard core
is...
> -Original Message-
> From: DJ Entropy [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 2:52 AM
> To: Cyclone Wehner; 313 Detroit
> Subject: RE: [
Trance in its roots was a marketing tool to identify techno with melody
That's a real shame that the definition of "techno" had degraded that
quickly in the early 90s, don't you think?
-d
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sicko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "M. Todd Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: [313] technology
> > Vath's 'Harlequin' 'Robot
> Wasn't that 'The Art of Noise'?
that´s it !!!
thanks for the reminder
Greets,
Maarten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wasn't that 'The Art of Noise'?
-Original Message-
From: Maarten Baute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 4:40 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: [313] technology
> all i have to say is who else has ventured out into the land of
> experimant
> Vath's 'Harlequin' 'Robot' & 'Ballet Dancer' <<
now, there's a record I never thought I'd see mentioned on the list. :)
I think the last "trance" cut that did anything for me was Balil's
"Nort Route."
-d
-
To unsubscribe,
ers are starting to show
up on trance/progressive labels (Selway & uggh Smith on Hooj? Rino Cerrone
on Saw? Carl Finlow on Bedrock?)
Back to work
todd
- Original Message -
From: "Brendan Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] Org" <313@hyperreal.org&g
time techno was
discovering its minimal side. A complete schism has occurred since then!
Brendan
| -Original Message-
| From: Mxyzptlk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: 19 October 2001 17:15
| To: M. Todd Smith; Detroits Finest List
| Subject: Re: [313] technology
|
|
| That's a VERY imp
That's a VERY important qualification. Back then, LOTS of things were
called "trance". I have some excellent old Subsonic "trance" volumes which
are full of Reel by Real, Dark Comedy, 69, etc., etc, tracks. What falls
into the "trance" bin these days is another animal altogether - imo anyway.
E
ROTECTED]>
To: "chad m sponholz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:42 AM
Subject: Re: [313] technology
> I purchased that exact tape from a rekkid store somewhere. That was most
> certainly *not* hawtin. Just a quick way f
-
From: "chad m sponholz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "DJ Entropy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Cyclone Wehner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 Detroit"
<313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:08 AM
Subject: RE: [313] technology
&
> all i have to say is who else has ventured out into the land of
> experimantation like hawtin has on the closer to the edit CD??
This idea goes far back in time with the album "close to the edit" (whithout
the r) released in 1985 by "?"
My memory is not so good ... I forgot who made this album
i bought a tape from my local record store a few years back that
just said "richie hawtin" on it with a neat minimal-looking front...
supposedly it was a live set from somewhere. i've since given away the
tape so i can't be sure what the info on it said unless it magically
re-appears somehow...
---Original Message---
>>all i have to say is who else has ventured out into the land of
>>experimantation like hawtin has on the closer to the edit CD??
Link anywhere?
I wanna hear just how "experimental" hawtin suppossedly is.
heh.
Ian Scott aka DJ Ent
Well dude is dropping Missy Elliott into his sets too now, I read in Jockey
Slut. Guess this means I get a reprieve from techno purists who scoff at my
R&B CDs now. Thanks Rich! ;) Now I dare Richie to drop Jay-Z or Bubba
Sparxxx. ;)
>all i have to say is who else has ventured out into the land o
Wow, this shit's gonna be bigger than Episode 1!
It's great to see an event like this taking place, it's obviously taken some
time, effort and cash to prepare, I'm sure it was hard work!
Can't wait for the British leg of the tour(which is when, by the way?)
A little curious as to the line, can'
Wow, this shit's gonna be bigger than Episode 1!
It's great to see an event like this taking place, it's obviously taken some
time, effort and cash to prepare, I'm sure it was hard work!
Can't wait for the British leg of the tour(which is when, by the way?)
A little curious as to the line, can'
51 matches
Mail list logo
