Ladies and Gentlemen: we are now in outer space! ;-)
Seriously, I think most people here will understand that as much as I
do
(i.e., barely.) Could I ask for clarification, or at least a simpler,
jargon-free description next time? No offence intended.
Ken
In short Ken, Outlook is rubbish..
(I'm deliberately over-quoting here)
Ken
**
The old Digest was completely broken and I'm glad it's been
fixed. The old Digest did not recognize MIME types and
everything was bludgeoned into 7-bit ASCII (plain text) and
so anything that wasn't plain text (quoted-printable, or
base64-encoded,
I wrote:
> The Digest isn't broken - it's Outlook that's broken for
> thinking properly-formatted MIME digests are a bunch of
> "attachments". (I'll fire up Entourage - the Office
> equivalent to Outlook Express - and see what they look
> like in that client.)
Entourage works fine with the curren
Greg Earle proclaimed:
"The Digest isn't broken - it's Outlook that's broken . . ."
'Twas ever thus.
/signed/
Fred
former Microsoft Mail Administrator
(Microsoft Mail was the ancient and just as broken
predecessor to Outlook and Exchange Server)
On Aug 4, 2005, at 4:22 PM, "Philip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK so it seems i'm not the only one who now gets all the digest
content as individual ezm file attachments. personally i am finding
this to be a complete pain. it was much easier to just scroll through
the digest when it was one file
