RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-10 Thread Robert Taylor
- it doesn't sound like a West production though. Does anyone know what it might be? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 September 2005 12:17 To: Odeluga, Ken; 313 Detroit Subject: Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited What I really admired was the way t

RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-09 Thread Odeluga, Ken
When Circulation started producing? (That's more or less on topic I think.) Martin, you're late. The case is closed. -Original Message- From: Martin Dust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 September 2005 15:37 To: list 313 Subject: Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited Kinda can

Re: Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-08 Thread /0
s list isnt the place to wack out racial differences within the techno community. I'm sorry for instigating this.. -Joe > > From: "Cyclone Wehner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/09/07 Wed PM 08:13:35 EDT > To: 313 Detroit <313@hyperreal.org> > Subje

Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-08 Thread Martin Dust
Kinda can't see why people are getting heated or beating down on Tom, sure he brings the heat but since when did techno become all "Beige" Martin

RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-08 Thread Odeluga, Ken
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 September 2005 14:36 To: Odeluga, Ken Cc: list 313 Subject: Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited On 9/8/05, Odeluga, Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK Kent, > > "But I consider Tom a > good friend." > > It prompts me to ask: would you carry

Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-08 Thread Dan Bean
> Tom may talk sh*t, and hold strong opinions, but I never saw him write > anything that rose to the level where I'd see him as a detriment to > the list. You might disagree, but you'd have to convince me and Matt > before there was any change from the status quo. I met Tom in person this year at

Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-08 Thread Dan Bean
> Tom may talk sh*t, and hold strong opinions, but I never saw him write > anything that rose to the level where I'd see him as a detriment to > the list. You might disagree, but you'd have to convince me and Matt > before there was any change from the status quo. I met Tom in person this year at

Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-08 Thread Kent Williams
On 9/8/05, Odeluga, Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK Kent, > > "But I consider Tom a > good friend." > > It prompts me to ask: would you carry enforce the rules of the list, if > in a severe case it came to that, even if it in involved a friend? > Yes. > > You being a good friend of the per

RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-08 Thread Odeluga, Ken
OK Kent, As you're now perpetuating the very thing which you asked us to stop... OK, don't take that seriously! :-) Actually, should we not recognize that discussing administration is quite on topic? I digress. What I'm interested in is this fact: "But I consider Tom a good friend." It prompt

Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-08 Thread Kent Williams
On 9/7/05, Renegade808 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > actually a week or so ago when Tom Cox attacked someone (like > normal)...Kent came on and in no certain words threatened to remove him > from the list if he did not stop his behavior. Actually this never happened, as far as I remember. It's

Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-08 Thread Kent Williams
The 313 List is not moderated. That would mean me, or some other poor schlemiel, reading every message and deciding whether it's appropriate for the list. The 313 list has 2 administrators, Matt and I. My main responsibility is looking at subscription requests and approving them, and occasionally

Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-08 Thread Cyclone Wehner
Kent is a good guy and contributes some excellent points as does Tom and others. Point taken on Kanye. I started the thread. I get the point. I respect it, let's move on. >From now on all references to Kanye will be censored from my posts. ;) Hey, anybody heard the new Paperclip People mix of *bee

Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-08 Thread Cyclone Wehner
care about what notes they write, in what > order, and the manner in which they are represented. I can think for > myself, thank you very much > > argh! > > sent with love, > > -Joe > >> >> From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date:

Re: RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-07 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
i think kent was saying that he wouldnt step in unless people griped to him. honestly, if you guys who complain about this list were on these other lists that have so much crap on them, i dont see why youd complain. very, very rarely is there a day on this list where there's so many posts that i de

Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-07 Thread theREALmxyzptlk
No one that i ever recall has moderated this list Remember Kelly/Omar Hackett? j

Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-07 Thread theREALmxyzptlk
No one that i ever recall has moderated this list. I've been on here for years and have never heard anyone say what Kent did in his last post. ahh who knows maybe i have not paid close enough attention George has booted people. Dunno if Matt has, but he's stepped in to cool things out befo

Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-07 Thread Renegade808
I'm not trying to start anything...just trying to discuss rationally my feeling on a moderator >From what i know Kent is a nice person with a level head. This is not about Kent...jus about a list moderator, whoever it is. No one that i ever recall has moderated this list. I've been on here for

Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-07 Thread theREALmxyzptlk
Renegade808 wrote: well i dont really have a problem with anyone on this list...i have had it out with alex a few times (all in good spirits). But i never knew we had a moderator... We've always had a moderator, at least in theory. I think it was George Smiley, then Matt MacQueen and I don't

Re: RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-07 Thread matt kane's brain
At 02:28 PM 9/7/2005, Renegade808 wrote: In my opinion this kinda sucks...nothing against Kent Williams (think i even met u in the D this year) But does this mean when Kent thinks something is on topic its ok to talk about it and if he says No then we can't? That to me seems kinda wrong. It mean

Re: RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-07 Thread Renegade808
well i dont really have a problem with anyone on this list...i have had it out with alex a few times (all in good spirits). But i never knew we had a moderator... In my opinion this kinda sucks...nothing against Kent Williams (think i even met u in the D this year) But does this mean when Kent thin

Re: RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-07 Thread matt kane's brain
At 09:46 AM 9/7/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: erm...I am the only one who sees an inherent contradiction in this post? perhaps not, but james' post didn't make it to the list before yours did!

Re: RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-07 Thread Kent Williams
As one of the Stealth Administrators of the 313 list, let me step in and say this: 1. A complaint about an off topic post isn't particularly on-topic either, and should be avoided. If you think a discussion has veered too far from the putative topic of the 313 list, drop me a line privately. I wil

Re: RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-07 Thread dan
erm...I am the only one who sees an inherent contradiction in this post? At 9:40 am -0700 7/9/05, James Newhouse wrote: IF I may butt in... I think Joe is tired of posts that have nothing to do with 313/detroittechno. I am a first time poster (hello!) who happens to agree with him. I miss the

Re: RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-07 Thread James Newhouse
IF I may butt in... I think Joe is tired of posts that have nothing to do with 313/detroittechno. I am a first time poster (hello!) who happens to agree with him. I miss the Morgan Geist days (and I wasn't even around back then) when just posting about Aphex was considered OT and not acceptable.

Re: RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-07 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message -- From: /0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >lets get this off this list. > >this is not: > >1.) politix 313 >2.) kanye west 313 >3.) r&b 313 > >if you want to tie the whole f'ing world into 313 (as seems to be the case with r&b artists getting "play

Re: RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-07 Thread /0
e, -Joe > > From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/09/07 Wed AM 11:03:09 EDT > To: "Cyclone Wehner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "313 Detroit" <313@hyperreal.org> > Subject: RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited > > &g

RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-07 Thread Odeluga, Ken
I note that in one wide US report on West's speech it was referred to as a "rant" which is also a very value-laden term in itself. > What I really admired was the way that despite obviously being full of > emotion and nerves he composed himself and calmly delivered what he wanted > to say - majo

Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-06 Thread Cyclone Wehner
I note that in one wide US report on West's speech it was referred to as a "rant" which is also a very value-laden term in itself. > What I really admired was the way that despite obviously being full of > emotion and nerves he composed himself and calmly delivered what he wanted > to say - major

Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s music for the first time > *after* hearing him say that. 'Good on yer mate,' as we say here. When > we're in south London that is... > > Ken > > -Original Message- > From: Cyclone Wehner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 September 2005 03:08 > T

RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-05 Thread Odeluga, Ken
r 2005 03:08 To: 313 Detroit Subject: Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited And major props for Kanye saying what he did on NBC on the New Orleans crisis. I had an idea he'd say what every fairminded person was thinking - and he did! > Never been a fan,, but Geesh what a musically rich album

Re: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-05 Thread Cyclone Wehner
And major props for Kanye saying what he did on NBC on the New Orleans crisis. I had an idea he'd say what every fairminded person was thinking - and he did! > Never been a fan,, but Geesh what a musically rich album. > > Perfectly used samples, appropriately utilized guest stars, and > intellig

RE: (313)OT Kanye Revisited

2005-09-01 Thread Redmond, Ja'Maul
Never been a fan,, but Geesh what a musically rich album. Perfectly used samples, appropriately utilized guest stars, and intelligent lyrics. Kind of surprised. Hadn't liked a rap album by modern rappers this much since the Roots or Outkast's Atliens. Wondering if rap fans today would apprecia