Re: [313] ugh?! REALLY?! THIS WEEKEND?!

On Fri, 24 May 2002, Mxyzptlk wrote: >True enough. Ignoring reality and shutting down constructive discussion can >also be seen as a negative attitude and that is also a fact. >Because I don't see what you see does not mean my eyes are closed or I >cannot "feel" accurately. Be careful of what you

Re: [313] ugh?! REALLY?! THIS WEEKEND?!

At 04:50 PM 5/24/2002, you wrote: Okay, I'm not one to say DEMF1 was greater than DEMF2, which was in turn greater than DEMF3 is likely to be that's a game of margins (like the "I was at Woodstock, or at such-and-such a Rolling Stones gig in London, or DEMF1, and if you weren't there, the

Re: [313] ugh

man its not the problems with media today, it was allways the probelm with the media. newpapaers and TV will allways try the build into you models and structures if thinking. i am right now doing a course about it in university. they have ways of making u think in a s certain way, it was nice dan

Re: [313] ugh?! REALLY?! THIS WEEKEND?!

At 02:59 PM 5/24/2002, chad wrote: On Fri, 24 May 2002, Mxyzptlk wrote: >I doubt the vibe which permeated the air at DEMF I (which was conspicuously >absent last year) will ever return in full force. well, that's the past... but i feel this vibe you're talking about any time i have the good for

Re: [313] ugh

I have to agree with Dan, the only reason I brought up the "IDM/dance" distinction yesterday because it was portrayed that way to some degree in the MT article (for understandable reasons). Right ... this seems to be a problem in the media only. I'm objecting more to the "spin" being put on the

Re: [313] ugh?! REALLY?! THIS WEEKEND?!

On Fri, 24 May 2002, Mxyzptlk wrote: >I doubt the vibe which permeated the air at DEMF I (which was conspicuously >absent last year) will ever return in full force. well, that's the past... but i feel this vibe you're talking about any time i have the good fortune to visit (or even pass through)

Re: [313] ugh

I have to agree with Dan, the only reason I brought up the "IDM/dance" distinction yesterday because it was portrayed that way to some degree in the MT article (for understandable reasons). OK, how about this: George Clinton and P-Funk: "IDM" or "dance." Discuss. PS I liked George's notion of

Re: [313] ugh

At 01:31 PM 5/24/2002, you wrote: from McCollum's article in the Free Press today (http://www.freep.com/entertainment/music/demf24_20020524.htm): "Scanning the weekend's lineup of 68 artists, some clear trends emerge. There's less IDM, or intelligent dance music, the sort of stuff favored by C

RE: [313] ugh

3 acts each day = 9 out of 68. not telling which ones I'm checking out. :P At 2:44 PM -0400 5/24/02, Jones, George wrote: BUT!!! You're still going, now aren't you? :) -Original Message- From: Dan Sicko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:

RE: [313] ugh

BUT!!! You're still going, now aren't you? :) -Original Message- From: Dan Sicko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:32 PM To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: [313] ugh from McCollum's article in the Free Press today (http://www.freep.com/entertainment/music/demf24_200205