;s rock solid !
finest mastering I've heard ever !
DMT
n.p. petestrumentals
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.
>
>
and filtering is so small it's not even funny. worry more
about speaker distortions.
what this has to do with 313 i don't know, but it had to be said. :)
Mike
From: "Joel Reitzloff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "--autopilot--" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, &l
might
be cool nothing is worse than having a needle jump.
Mike
From: "DJ DMT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "313 detroit" <313@hyperreal.org>
Subject: Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 22:12:46 +0200
I ca
don't argue?
--- Joel Reitzloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> actually, the machines producing your favorite sounds are producing
> AT
> LEAST, and DONT ARGUE 24bit sound, sometimes even at 48000 or higher
> khz.
First, CD Quality is 16 bit, 44.1khz. 48khz is NOT enough of a
difference that you w
autopilot--" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 5:58 AM
Subject: Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.
> >I think alot of the quality of the audio goes out the window after
digital
> >quantizantion.
>
> Something I don&
with
lot's and lots of bricks
But maybe you can tell me something about th'm different frequenties the
quartz resonates to ?
dmt
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 12:33 PM
Subject: Re
At 08:21 AM 4/11/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exactly - even the tracks made with all analgue synths and drum machines
are generally mastered to DAT, which is if i remember right 16 bit 44khz,
same as CD.
dat can go up to 48khz sampling (same as most newer soundcards these days)
(still 16 bi
.. which reminds me, *sort of* on topic, and *sort of* a plug, kinda... for
those interested in new [digital] DJing technology and in the London UK
area.
As I've mentioned before, I'm currently working [privately] on an
experimental DJ software project called hummingbird. Runs on a Wintel PC,
cont
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>needle resonance can add dynamics if mastered properly.
Which raises the question, can needle resonance be simulated in a purely
digital domain ? Or does it occur at frequencies above the audible / 22.05
KHz range ? After all, pickups are mechanical devices, so they should h
> >I think alot of the quality of the audio goes out the window after digital
> >quantizantion.
>
> Something I don't understand here - so much music is made with samplers and
> other digital devices, so presumably the sound coming out is quantised to
> 16-bit/44.1KHz by definition anyway - how c
Ash wrote:
> Something I don't understand here - so much music is made with samplers and
> other digital devices, so presumably the sound coming out is quantised to
> 16-bit/44.1KHz by definition anyway - how can writing that quantised sound
> onto vinyl suddenly give it a better dynamic range / q
needle resonance can add dynamics if mastered properly.
154
> Debates r.e. the quality of mp3 files are mainly irrelevant
> at present since
> the primary point of mp3 files is swapping, i.e. you take
> what you can get
> in terms of bitrate. Sure, higher bitrates sound better, but
> most extant
> files are lower bitrate. Since it's a lossy compression
>I think alot of the quality of the audio goes out the window after digital
>quantizantion.
Something I don't understand here - so much music is made with samplers and
other digital devices, so presumably the sound coming out is quantised to
16-bit/44.1KHz by definition anyway - how can writing th
: "Scotto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Scotto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "313" <313@hyperreal.org>
Subject: Re: [313] vinyl: not for me; but mp3 cds are.
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:04:39 -0400
> True, vinyl -- or at least new vinyl -- has higher au
uel feedback in the eq in winamp
a real nice welcome tool on mastering and dynamic control
can also make a track nice and gritty
Dj DMT
- Original Message -
From: "Scotto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "313" <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:04
> True, vinyl -- or at least new vinyl -- has higher audio dynamics
> than CD, but then these enhancements can only be realized with a
> proper (and more importantly, properly _tuned_) PA. Any other
> differences between vinyl and CD are due to mastering; processes
> which in turn can be encoded t
> Is anyone as excited about this stuff as I am? Just
> wondering.. / resume your activities.
Same goes for me - bought a DVD player that reads MP3 CDs + have been
owning a Lyra (1 hour of music) for more than one year now... Doesn't
prevent me from still buying CDs to get a really good sou
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
there´s more to vinyl than just the soundquality, keep listening to our stuff
and find out..i don´t release much stuff on cd, otherwise u could hear the
difference...there can b so much more sub and spatial highs because of needle
resonance and stuff...
True, vinyl -- or
there´s more to vinyl than just the soundquality, keep listening to our stuff
and find out..i don´t release much stuff on cd, otherwise u could hear the
difference...there can b so much more sub and spatial highs because of needle
resonance and stuffbig up to mike from SSR for showin us t
I like mp3 cds. You have 10+ hours of music on one
disk. I'm all for massive amounts of information in a
small package. Vinyl is big and clunky, it wears out
and you can't store too much on a slab of plastic.
However for DJs, it (vinyl) may be great, but not for
me. (Sidenote: I wish people wo
21 matches
Mail list logo
