[389-devel] Re: GSoc 2017:Regarding the project developing administrative tools for 389 directory server

Hi William, many thanks for the reply i go through the references and assigned tasks thanks, On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:43 PM, William Brown wrote: > On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 01:51 -0800, Asantha Thilina wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am final year software engineering student at srilanka institute

[389-devel] Re: GSoc 2017:Regarding the project developing administrative tools for 389 directory server

On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 01:51 -0800, Asantha Thilina wrote: > Hi all, > > I am final year software engineering student at srilanka institute of > information technology and i would like to contribute to project *developing > administrative tools for 389 directory server* for GSoC and i would like to

[389-devel] Re: Q. on lib389 Re: Please review: #49121 ns-slapd crashes in ldif_sput due to the output buf size is less than the real size.

On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 09:31 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote: > On 02/13/2017 08:51 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > > On (13/02/17 08:38), Noriko Hosoi wrote: > >> On 02/12/2017 06:14 PM, William Brown wrote: > >>> On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 17:42 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote: > On 02/12/2017 03:51 PM, Noriko H

[389-devel] Re: Q. on lib389 Re: Please review: #49121 ns-slapd crashes in ldif_sput due to the output buf size is less than the real size.

On 02/13/2017 08:51 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (13/02/17 08:38), Noriko Hosoi wrote: On 02/12/2017 06:14 PM, William Brown wrote: On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 17:42 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote: On 02/12/2017 03:51 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49121 https://pagure.io/

[389-devel] Re: Q. on lib389 Re: Please review: #49121 ns-slapd crashes in ldif_sput due to the output buf size is less than the real size.

Well, I'm not at the position to insist anything any more here :p, your comments and suggestions and requests are still very welcome and needed, independent of your "position". For me it is such a pity to see you leaving the team and I hope you will still find some time to help us and give us

[389-devel] Another Q. on pagure issue page: Please review: #49121 ns-slapd crashes in ldif_sput due to the output buf size is less than the real size.

Hi, it might be a known issue, but ... When we have multiple links in, e.g., rhbz, what is the right way to list them? Separated with ' ' does not work. It's considered one url, instead of 2, and it does not jump to the bug by clicking it... ***rhbz* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho

[389-devel] Re: Q. on lib389 Re: Please review: #49121 ns-slapd crashes in ldif_sput due to the output buf size is less than the real size.

On (13/02/17 08:38), Noriko Hosoi wrote: >On 02/12/2017 06:14 PM, William Brown wrote: >> On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 17:42 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote: >> > On 02/12/2017 03:51 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: >> > > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49121 >> > > >> > > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/f

[389-devel] Re: Q. on lib389 Re: Please review: #49121 ns-slapd crashes in ldif_sput due to the output buf size is less than the real size.

On 02/12/2017 06:14 PM, William Brown wrote: On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 17:42 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote: On 02/12/2017 03:51 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49121 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/d857ff4919940bcebeae870774896783f7b6e86ce08a2c2e924610ac2335f8

[389-devel] Re: Q. on lib389 Re: Please review: #49121 ns-slapd crashes in ldif_sput due to the output buf size is less than the real size.

On 02/12/2017 09:14 PM, William Brown wrote: > On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 17:42 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote: >> On 02/12/2017 03:51 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: >>> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49121 >>> >>> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/d857ff4919940bcebeae870774896783f7b6e86ce08a2c2e

[389-devel] Re: Please review: #49121 ns-slapd crashes in ldif_sput due to the output buf size is less than the real size.

On 02/12/2017 06:51 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: > > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49121 > > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/d857ff4919940bcebeae870774896783f7b6e86ce08a2c2e924610ac2335f8de-0001-Ticket-49121-ns-slapd-crashes-in-ldif_sput-due-to-th.patch > > These odd » characters a

[389-devel] Re: Trac -> Pagure migration is complete

On 02/13/2017 05:51 AM, Simon Pichugin wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 05:23:24PM -0500, Mark Reynolds wrote: >>Our migration to Pagure is complete. Please use this project for >>filing Directory Server issues (aka Tickets): >>[1]https://pagure.io/389-ds-base >>Trac is now in re

[389-devel] Re: Trac -> Pagure migration is complete

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 05:23:24PM -0500, Mark Reynolds wrote: >Our migration to Pagure is complete. Please use this project for >filing Directory Server issues (aka Tickets): >[1]https://pagure.io/389-ds-base >Trac is now in read-only mode. If you need help with any of this just

[389-devel] GSoc 2017:Regarding the project developing administrative tools for 389 directory server

Hi all, I am final year software engineering student at srilanka institute of information technology and i would like to contribute to project *developing administrative tools for 389 directory server* for GSoC and i would like to know more about the project and would be grateful if someone can gu

[389-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: 389-DS-NIGHTLY #163

See -- [...truncated 5453 lines...] INFO:dirsrvtests.tests.tickets.ticket47536_test:# Extract PK12 file for master2: pk12util -o /tmp/Server-Cert2.pk12 -n "Server-Cert2" -d