[389-devel] Re: Please review: Issue 49657 - Fix cascading replication scenario in lib389 API

2018-05-11 Thread Simon Pichugin
The issues mentioned by Mark were fixed. On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 02:32:22PM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote: > Hi team, > please, review: > > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49659 > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49657 > > Thanks! > Simon > ___

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 49671 - Readonly replicas should not write internal ops to changelog

2018-05-11 Thread Mark Reynolds
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49671 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49672 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Re: lib389 usage cheatsheet

2018-05-11 Thread Simon Pichugin
Hi Thierry, I agree with you, it was exactly my proposition :) Keeping main python-ldap elements is important because we don't want to implement or mask/wrap this basic functionality (like working with controls, etc) we just want to redirect them. Ideally, we should make our admin library very i