RE: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders

2006-08-17 Thread Han Valk
> Its only in the forest domain IIRC ;-) > > M@ > > > On 8/14/06, Han Valk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No??? Child domain. > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders

2006-08-14 Thread Han Valk
est > Trust Builders > > By the way you are looking for this on the forest root right? > > M@ > > > On 8/14/06, Han Valk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yep logged in as Domain Admin. > > > -Original Message-

RE: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders

2006-08-14 Thread Han Valk
oming Forest > Trust Builders > > I am wondering if there are ACLs defined on the group itself > or the OU above to prevent you from seen it. Do you see it as > the Administrator account of the domain? > > M@ > > > On 8/14/06, Han Valk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders

2006-08-14 Thread Han Valk
ct: RE: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > Trust Builders > > Maybe the user moved it to another OU? Have you done a full forest > search for the account? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Han Valk &g

RE: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders

2006-08-14 Thread Han Valk
e88-a216-45f9-9739-cb1fb22a0642&DisplayLang=en> its not > possible to move delete rename this group. > > May be he exploited the dynamic objects feature in Windows > 2003 RTM? > http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/tomek/archive/2006/06/23/1175.aspx > > > M@ > >

[ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders

2006-08-14 Thread Han Valk
Hi, A smart co-worker deleted the BUILTIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders group. Is it possible to recreate this group with the same well known SID? Authoritative restore is out of the question, deletetion is too long ago. Han Valk. List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware

2005-11-14 Thread Han Valk
We've performed tests with one VM (using ESX Server) with Exchange installed on it. This VM had a blade all for itself. With this configuration we could only host 1500 mailboxes and still have acceptable response times. When we did the same tests on bare metal (same blade) we could host 4000 mailbo

RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware

2005-10-31 Thread Han Valk
Hi, I have seen tests conducted with loadsim on Exchange Server 2003 running on bare metal and on Vmware ESX Server 2003 running on the same hardware. The conclusion was that one can host a lot more mailboxes on bare metal. There's a white paper on Vmware's site that says not to host more than 100

RE: [ActiveDir] Applications on 2003 DC

2004-01-08 Thread Han Valk
Hi, Exchange 2003 will work on a DC. Just keep in mind that because of a 'bug' a shutdown/reboot of that combination takes quite some time. Best regards, Han Valk. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Chris Flesher Sent: Wed 07-Jan-04 17:59