Re: Linked-In Group

2011-07-27 Thread Fred Moyer
Actually the website has been updated at least three times this year. If you follow the documentation commit list you will get notifications of changes. Again, please check out the users and developers email list. mod_perl is much more active than you are portraying here. On Jul 26, 2011 12:06 P

Re: New User Inquiry

2011-07-25 Thread Fred Moyer
Please see the increasingly active mod_perl users list: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Jim Schueler wrote: > Based on the archives, no one has posted on this advocacy list since April, > 2009.  First and foremost would be some assurance that this l

Re: [SECURITY] [CVE-2009-0796] Vulnerability found in Apache::Status and Apache2::Status

2009-04-07 Thread Fred Moyer
Update - I fat fingered the CVE number in this email body previously (but it was correct in the subject). The correct vulnerability reference number is CVE-2009-0796. On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Fred Moyer wrote: > mod_perl lists, > > A specific vulnerability [CVE-2009-0795]

[SECURITY] [CVE-2009-0796] Vulnerability found in Apache::Status and Apache2::Status

2009-04-01 Thread Fred Moyer
mod_perl lists, A specific vulnerability [CVE-2009-0795] in Apache::Status and Apache2::Status has been discovered which may affect the security of your mod_perl installation. Running Apache::Status on a public server with no protection has always been a bad idea though, vulnerability or not. Th

Re: perl at apachecon

2008-04-02 Thread Fred Moyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: hi all :) perl's (and mod_perl's) presence at apachecon has been dwindling over the years. I won't get into a rant about why this might be, so please don't you do it either :) (I'm CC'ing this to advocacy, in case anyone

Re: FastCGI, mod_perl, catalyst

2007-12-08 Thread Fred Moyer
Adam Prime wrote: I realize this list has been completely dead for a year now, but i'll give this a shot anyway. I saw this today. http://perlbuzz.com/mechanix/2007/12/simple-apachefastcgicatalyst-c.html And I wondered if anyone might want to address the comment 'mod_perl is bloated'. I'm s

Re: FAQ (WAS: misc advocacy ideas)

2004-12-14 Thread Fred Moyer
>> * how much does mod_perl cost ? >> * where can wwe get support ? >> * the software is broken and we can't sue anyone. what do we do ? >> * perl is dead, right - so why go with mod_perl ? >> * we heard apache is insecure - is this true ? >> * can we integrate mod_perl with our Economy systems > >