I worked at Cycorp when the FACTory game was developed. The examples below do
not reveal Cyc's knowledge of the assertions connecting these disparate
concepts, rather most show that the argument constraints of the terms compared
are rather overly generalized. The exception is the example "Most
Another way to group the data might be to tease it out into dimensions of
what, where, when and whom. There does seem to be some neurological
evidence for this kind of categorization. Also, by indexing the data along
these lines it allows you to some extent to make meaningful interpolations
from
Well, there's no reason to stop at a purely utilitarian level. A high level
of consciousness may be necessary for performing certain kinds of task, such
as imagining someone's reaction to a particular event.
On 14/01/07, Gary Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, and it's a damn good thing
No, and it's a damn good thing it isn't. If it was we would be sentencing
it to a mindless job with no time off, only to be disposed of when a better
model
comes out.
We only want our AI's to be a smart as necessary to accomplish their jobs
just as
our cells and organs are.
Limited conciousnes
--- Gabriel R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, if you can think of any way to turn the knowledge-entry process into a
> fun game or competition, go for it. I've been told by a few people working
> on similar projects that making the knowledge-providing process engaging and
> fun for visitors end
J Marlow wrote:
I like the idea that self-awareness emerges as a result of a utility
designed to model other minds. After reading this article, I began
thinking about it and some of its implications. I started thinking
about language.
So I have a little thought experiment I thought I would s
This is a nice idea, but even this may not be needed. Under the orignal
Mindpixel idea where coherences are calculated from true/false statements it
should be possible to detect controversy and automatically group
sub-psychologies. Simply keeping track of what mindpixels have been entered
by wha
I think all these are excellent suggestions.
On 13/01/07, Joel Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some comments/suggestions:
* I think such a project should make the data public domain. Ignore
silly ideas like giving be "shares" in the knowledge or whatever. It
just complicates things. If the p
On 1/14/07, Chuck Esterbrook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Would it support separate domains/modules?
I didn't realize the importance of this point at first. Indeed, what we
regard as common sense may be highly subjective as it involves matters such
as human values, ideology or religion. So th
I like the idea that self-awareness emerges as a result of a utility
designed to model other minds. After reading this article, I began thinking
about it and some of its implications. I started thinking about language.
So I have a little thought experiment I thought I would share.
Suppose somewh
10 matches
Mail list logo
