Re: [algogeeks] ADULT SEX PHOTOS

2011-04-15 Thread sharad kumar
BANNED! On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:51 AM, siddharth srivastava wrote: > Unexpected but most of us have quoted the spam in our replies :-) > > Well, I guess the moderator is reading and would take an action soon > > -- > Regards > Siddharth Srivastava > > > > -- > You received this message bec

Re: [algogeeks] Online Jobs for Students

2011-04-15 Thread Abhishek Sharma
Our all candidates of batch Sept 10 - Jan 11 got placed in top MNC companies with very lucrative salary like earlier batches. Most of the candidates had multiple job offers with min Rs. 15000/- in hand per month salary. Jan 11 - May 11 batch placement is running and almost 50% students has already

[algogeeks] Re: [gcj] Regarding CJ onsite finals

2011-04-15 Thread Umer Farooq
Ok, thanks :) On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Hiep Q Dinh wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Umer Farooq wrote: > >> Last time, we attended qualifying round and round 1 from our homes (we >> didn't reach round 2 :p ). Anyway, is there anyone who can tell me about my >> query? >> >> >

Re: [algogeeks] ADULT SEX PHOTOS

2011-04-15 Thread siddharth srivastava
Unexpected but most of us have quoted the spam in our replies :-) Well, I guess the moderator is reading and would take an action soon -- Regards Siddharth Srivastava -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, s

[algogeeks] Re: Compiler Design Help

2011-04-15 Thread rgap
Send me links too, please On Apr 10, 3:14 am, rahul rai wrote: > None has been published  . If you want i can give you a two links to > video courses , and some set of solved questions . Which will be good > for "compiler design help" > > On 4/10/11, Harshal wrote: > > > > > someone please share

Re: [algogeeks] Re: recursion

2011-04-15 Thread priya mehta
sorry i did some blunders but finally got my code working :) #include using namespace std; void func(int a,int b,char *str) { if(a==0&&b==0) {str[4-(a+b)]='\0';cout<0) { str[4-(a+b)]='('; func(a-1,b,str); } if(b>a) { str[4-(a+b)]=')'; func(a,

Re: [algogeeks] Re: recursion

2011-04-15 Thread Harshit Gangal
there are two if statements and not an id else statement. so in first case a is modified and then next if statement is checked against b>a whereas in 2nd case a is not modified and checkd with the same value for the second if statement On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 8:39 PM, priya mehta wrote: > http://

[algogeeks] Re: recursion

2011-04-15 Thread priya mehta
http://www.ideone.com/IKM57 http://www.ideone.com/PmJ7A there is a minor change between the codes one works another doesn't someone please tell the reason On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 8:38 PM, priya mehta wrote: > http://www.ideone.com/PmJ7A > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed

[algogeeks] recursion

2011-04-15 Thread priya mehta
http://www.ideone.com/PmJ7A -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more optio

[algogeeks] Online Jobs for Students

2011-04-15 Thread Geo News
*Online Jobs for students Online Typing Work from Home No Age Limit | Easy Application http://bit.ly/degreeZ --- * -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.

Re: [algogeeks] Re: Mathematical Brain Teaser 14april

2011-04-15 Thread vaibhav shukla
Hey chek out my postdat is the perfect logic ;) On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:51 PM, DeVaNsH gUpTa wrote: > I don't think it is correct solution as we don't change digits, but one > possible solution is to change minus(-) sign and equal(=) sign. > > 62=63-1. > > -- > You received this message bec

Re: [algogeeks] Re: Mathematical Brain Teaser 14april

2011-04-15 Thread DeVaNsH gUpTa
I don't think it is correct solution as we don't change digits, but one possible solution is to change minus(-) sign and equal(=) sign. 62=63-1. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@go

[algogeeks] Re: [brain teaser ] Math Prime number puzzle 15april

2011-04-15 Thread xeron!x
Any prime number greater than 3 is congruent to 1 or 5 mod 6. a is a prime number => a % 6 == 1 or a % 6 == 5 a*a + 26 != prime for a = 2,3 for a > 3: if a % 6 == 1: (a*a)%6 == 1 and 26 % 6 = 2 => ( a*a + 26 ) % 6 = 3 => not prime if a % 6 == 5: (a*a)%6 == (a%6)*(a%6)%6 => (5*5)%6 = 1 => (

[algogeeks] Finding non-repetitive element from an Array with complexity n

2011-04-15 Thread Subhransu
Hey Geeks, Though there are multiple algo to find an element but with a complexity of O(N), How to find NON-repetitive element from an array also best effective memory/space complexity as well. Lets say an array is A{1, 1024, 2 , 1, 2, 3, 4, 4 } The output has to be foundout "3" with complexity n

[algogeeks] Re: Mathematical Brain Teaser 14april

2011-04-15 Thread me13013
On Apr 14, 9:19 am, Lavesh Rawat wrote: > * Mathematical Equation Puzzle > > By moving one of the following digits, make the equation correct. 62 - 63 = 1 I know this isn't moving a digit, but take one of the strokes in the equals sign and move it over the minus sign, making 62 = 63 - 1 -- You

[algogeeks] Re: Square of Large integer

2011-04-15 Thread me13013
On Apr 14, 9:52 pm, saurabh singh wrote: > For much larger numbers than this try Exponentiation by squaring method Just how much improvement should the OP expect from the "exponentiation by squaring" method... when the exponent is 2? -- You received this message because you are subscribed t

Re: [algogeeks] [brain teaser ] Math Prime number puzzle 15april

2011-04-15 Thread LALIT SHARMA
9+26 = 53 lolzz... On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:20 PM, hary rathor wrote: > it true because 2*2+26 =30 which is not prime number > 3*3+26=53 which is prime number > > these both statement contradicting that given expression is not suitable > for all prime number > > so not true > > --

Re: [algogeeks] [brain teaser ] Math Prime number puzzle 15april

2011-04-15 Thread hary rathor
it true because 2*2+26 =30 which is not prime number 3*3+26=53 which is prime number these both statement contradicting that given expression is not suitable for all prime number so not true -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.

Re: [algogeeks]

2011-04-15 Thread hary rathor
hey geeks wake upp... ans this question ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups

Re: [algogeeks] [brain teaser ] Math Prime number puzzle 15april

2011-04-15 Thread Carl Barton
What do you mean by 'Whether it is true'? On 15 April 2011 09:41, Lavesh Rawat wrote: > * Puzzle * > * > * > *If 'a' is a prime number, then prove, that a*a+26 is NOT a prime number > (whether it is true).* > > *Update Your Answers at* : Click > Here

[algogeeks] [brain teaser ] Math Prime number puzzle 15april

2011-04-15 Thread Lavesh Rawat
* Puzzle If 'a' is a prime number, then prove, that a*a+26 is NOT a prime number (whether it is true). * *Update Your Answers at* : Click Here Solution: Will be updated after 1 day --