Re: [algogeeks] P ! = NP

Thats the scary part. Some MIT Professor has announced additional 200 thousand dollars, if the proof is correct. He will surely get a turing, if the proof is correct. Will be second Indian after Raj Reddy to achieve this. Kishen On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Varun Nagpal wrote: > Yeah,,,...le

Re: [algogeeks] P ! = NP

Yeah,,,...lets hope the next turing goes to this Indian. Its still being verified. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Kishen Das wrote: > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/7938238/Computer-scientist-Vinay-Deolalikar-claims-to-have-solved-maths-riddle-of-P-vs-NP.html > > Check out

[algogeeks] P ! = NP

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/7938238/Computer-scientist-Vinay-Deolalikar-claims-to-have-solved-maths-riddle-of-P-vs-NP.html Check out this cool news. Kishen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this

[algogeeks] [P=NP]Algorithm

PROCESSORS P(NP, NP) RANGE X(N), Y(N) DISTRIBUTE X ONTO P(BLOCK, *) DISTRIBUTE Y ONTO P(*, BLOCK) SHADOW (1) X, Y REAL A X, Y ON (P) ! Initialize the array... OVERALL(I = X, J = Y) A [I, J] = ... ENDOVERALL DO ITER = 1, NITER DO ICOLOUR = 0, 1 CALL DA_WRITE_HALO(A, (/CYCL, CYCL/), (/1, 1/))