@Gunjan Sharma:
Why do you think 50 is not an acceptable answer???
You might be thinking last 5 zeroes not representing the number of zeroes
followed..thus you gave an answer as 10 in one of your previous
post...
But as per the problem is exemplified, *if it is the original precise
10 is the best answer if the condition is number of non-zero digits
should be maximum...
Best Regards
Ashish Goel
"Think positive and find fuel in failure"
+919985813081
+919966006652
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Gunjan Sharma wrote:
> 10 what about this??
>
> --
> You rece
>
>50 is the answer..
>>>
--
//BE COOL// kavi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
algogeeks+u
no of zeros following does not mean immediately following as someone
mentioned
so 50 seems to be best answer ans for all fives there are five zeros
following them at the end
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Gunjan Sharma wrote:
> I dont understand why 50 is an acceptable answer.
Possible solutions under given constraints are :
Number :: sum of non-zero digits
90 :: 9
88 :: 16
777000 :: 21
00 :: 24
50 :: 25*
44 :: 24
333000 :: 21
00 :: 16
10 :: 9
50 is the clear choice. No algorithm/code is need
I dont understand why 50 is an acceptable answer. What I understand
from the problem is that each digit should tell te number of zeros following
it which is not fulfilled by 50. Please throw some light.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Kunal Patil wrote:
> Does this problem requ
Does this problem require algorithmic approach, at all
As per the problem statement i think answer can be deciphered manually and
many intelligent people have already given it...
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:15 PM, anand karthik
wrote:
> Can anyone suggest an algorithmic approach?
> On Mar 16, 2
Can anyone suggest an algorithmic approach?
On Mar 16, 2011 9:08 PM, "annarao naidu kataru"
wrote:
> i tried so many but the possible answer is 50 as u said
> thank u
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Gunjan Sharma wrote:
>
>> 10 what about this??
>>
>> --
>> You received this m
i tried so many but the possible answer is 50 as u said
thank u
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Gunjan Sharma wrote:
> 10 what about this??
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, se
10 what about this??
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more opti
Hi its number of zeros following it or no of 0s immediately after it.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:07 PM, HARISH S.C wrote:
> The best answer I can come up with is 9
> 503000 (or) 90
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:37 PM, bittu wrote:
>
>> i don't think another answer 50 is best
The best answer I can come up with is 9
503000 (or) 90
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:37 PM, bittu wrote:
> i don't think another answer 50 is best answer according to
> your constraints
> may sum1 else can think but i found its correct
>
> Thanks
> Shashank
>
> --
> You received
correct
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:37 PM, bittu wrote:
> i don't think another answer 50 is best answer according to
> your constraints
> may sum1 else can think but i found its correct
>
> Thanks
> Shashank
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
i don't think another answer 50 is best answer according to
your constraints
may sum1 else can think but i found its correct
Thanks
Shashank
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogee
14 matches
Mail list logo
