I'm planing to upgrade to release 2.2 since last week.
The questions that come up while preparing my first openpkg live server to be
upgradet don't receaved any coments/answers.
Did they reached the list ?
The subject where:
Re: Upgrade procedure
I've setup chroot env and preparing to test
from prev mail)
I have no ATTENTION when runing openpkg build -Ua
Thanks,
Alex
Citando Michael van Elst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 04:35:28PM -0300, Alexander Belck wrote:
looking to new.sh I found some ATTENCION I don't understand
# ATTENTION: mysql-4.0.20-2.1.0
I´ve somehow the idea the packages should be compiled with non-root privileges.
I created .openpk/build wher I put -P sudo in.
This worked fine except for 2 packages I was upgrading.
The db-4.2.52.2-2.2.0 and libxslt-1.1.11-2.2.0 compiled with non-root privileges
aparently, generating binary
I've setup chroot env and preparing to test upgrade I issued:
openpkg build -za new.sh
looking to new.sh I found some ATTENCION I don't understand
# ATTENTION: mysql-4.0.20-2.1.0 is in LIMBO
# ATTENTION: openldap-2.2.14-2.1.0 is in LIMBO
# ATTENTION: openssl-0.9.7d-2.1.0 is in LIMBO
#
I'd like to know if it is possible to update to the final 3.0.0 version, as I
need a future corrected in this version.
Thanks,
Alex
--
ATIX Tecnologia e Com Ltda
Tel.: +55-(11) 4667-5900
This message was sent using IMP, the
Today I updated apache following security advise.
It happens that the instalation overides rc.apache that should be treated as a
configuration file, since there ara options that could be set previously (and
in this specific case, I needed to implement the graceful action).
In general form I think
CURRENT Release ?
Thanks,
Alex
Citando Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
I'd like to know if it is possible to update to the final 3.0.0 version, as
I
need a future corrected in this version.
Well, in OpenPKG 2.1 there cannot be 3.0.0
the way a server starts.
Should I repead the configuration settings I whant to change from
rc.xxx in rc.conf with my setting ?
Thanks,
Alex
Citando Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
Today I updated apache following security advise
As Bill's freeradius-1.0.0 is the closest ver I got to build, could someone tell
me if I can just make a symlink from install to ginstall ?
I searched google for ginstall and got only old (1999/2000) references to that
and in one it told that ginstall has been renamed to install.
Any other
Can openpkg tool genaret a script that would rebuild all packages with same
options on an other platform.
To clarify my english. I have worked to get several functions work together
using OpenPKG build from source on my old RH7.3.
If I got a new server wher I could install CL10 or FC3 and would
I'm trying to install freeradius.
I got freeradius-1.0.0-20040810.src.rpm from current, then:
openpkg rpm --rebuild freeradius-1.0.0-20040810.src.rpm
:
:
../modules/rlm_x99_token/.libs/rlm_x99_token.a(x99_mac.o)(.text+0x71): In
function `x99_mac':
: undefined reference to `DES_cbc_encrypt'
servers are all from OPKG and if they need I guess
they use OPKG version of openssl.
Thanks for any tip that could bring me further.
Alex
Citando Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
I'm trying to install freeradius.
I got freeradius-1.0.0
refering to DES_cbc_encrypt), but when linking it use the lib from RH7.3 where
it could not find this function.
Can I be interpreting this write ?
Any sugestion how to fix it ?
Thanks,
Alex
Citando Michael van Elst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 02:59:22PM -0300, Alexander Belck
When I run:
openpkg rc openldap status
I Got:
openldap_usable=unknown
As I understand the rc.openldap script, there is nothing changing the usability
status in the script.
So is it intended to by change by hand because this service doesn't provide a
eficient way to tell if it is usable or
I compiled,configured and started OpenPKG postfix with aparently no errors, but
I Can't get positive connection nor any error.
When I : telnet localhost smtp I got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# telnet localhost smtp
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
but no, 220
I'm using a project that whants to issue a apache graceful command.
In RH apache seams to be started/stoped/reloaded with apachectl comand
In OpenPKG rc.apache this actions seams to me be done by sending specific kill
signals to apache.
Can I still use apachectl graceful ?
Is there a better o
I'm realy anewby with perl.
The install instruction of the project I whant to run I'm asked to update perl
with CPAN. The sequence I should do was:
perl -MCPAN -eshell
CPAN install MD5
CPAN install Bundle::CPAN
While trying to do this with OpenPKG version of perl I got a recursive error:
:
:
Again, I was using distros configuration files without knowing exactly whats
going on ;-(
Now I'm trying to get apache to run, and got to some problems.
The testpage refers to DocumentRoot that links to:
/manual/mod/core.html#documentroot
Under the /manual/mod/ I found the Language versions of
OpenPKG apache.base directs to do changes in apache.conf and overaid default
settings.
I tryed to change the default access.log and error.log destination including:
CustomLog /isp/var/log/apache/access.log common env=!ignore_global_access
ErrorLog /isp/var/log/apache/error.log
but know I got
I thought that being able to use the most up to date version of perl should
avoid bug or security problems corrected in newer versions (while correct
scripts should further run as the language syntax and standarts should not
change).
Yes, but it can also break existing scripts that depend on
Is there any plan to include FreeRadius in OpenPKG ?
It has manny new features, I guess its the only Open Source handling wireless
802.1x authentication and also supports many external authentications like
LDAP, MySQL, PgSQL, ...
Thanks,
Alex
--
ATIX Tecnologia e Com Ltda
Tel.: +55-(11)
Where can I find this OpenPKG vers of FreeRadius ?
Can it easyly by upgradet to 1.0.0 and does it provide --with-ldap ?
Thanks,
Alex
Citando Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
Is there any plan to include FreeRadius in OpenPKG ?
It has manny new
I used to install bind in chroot mode running with a bind exclusive user.
1st) Is OpenPKG ver of bind chroot enabled (-t chrootdir) ?
2nd) opkg_bind uses opkg[-r] user.
Does I gain more security using an distinct user and chrooting opkg_bind ?
3rd) What does option with_dlz enables ?
if [ OPKG-ENV_NOT_SET ]; then
/opkg/etc/rc --eval all env
fi
/opkg/bin/perl $*
Also I don't know how to check if OPKG_ENV_NOT_SET. Should grabing opkg in
$PATH
be enouth ?
Thanks,
Alex
Citando Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote
A few days ago I removed gcc from the underlying OS.
Today I tryed to rebuild apache in openpkg-2.1 and got following error:
./configure:Error: Building of 'patch' tool failed:
-
patch/rename.c
patch/util.c
patch/util.h
patch/version.c
Looking for crt1.o (found in config.log from m4 --rebuild) I notice that it
realy was missing. Comparing with other RedHat instalation I found that this
comes from glibc-devel, that I also de-installed ;-(
So, after reinstalling glibc-devel I could rebuild m4 and my conclusion is that
I need to
Is there any chance to have courier-imap for openpkg ?
The developers source comes with a .spec.
I tryed to convert it to a openpkg-1.3.spec last year with no success due my
poor understanding of all the options in a .spec file.
I would realy prefer a imap mailserver with mailbox comatible
Citando Michael Schloh von Bennewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
Is there any chance to have courier-imap for openpkg ?
Bill CAMPBELL graciously offered you the Courier IMAP package before,
and you'll even find a OpenPKG 2.1 version if you look around
Alex
Citando Michael Schloh von Bennewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
Citando Michael Schloh von Bennewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill CAMPBELL graciously offered you the Courier IMAP package before,
and you'll even find a OpenPKG 2.1 version if you look around
I'm still confused in using apache --with_php and having php installed.
I whant to be able to install HORDE in sites handled by APACHE.
HORDE needs PHP PEAR.
In openpkg-2.0 I could compile apache --with_php_pear, but not simultaneosly php
--with_pear.
Now, in openpkg-2.1 apache does not accept
I need to connect several smal health offices to the center office in a secure
conection over the Internet.
I intend to use uBering as the firewall on each unit, but do not know what to
shoose to securely conect them.
There is stunel, pptp, IPSec, OpenVPN
At the center office is a
= fifo_open.c fifo_rdwr_bug.c fifo_rdonly_bug.c select_bug.c \
stream_test.c dup2_pass_on_exec.c
DEFS = -I. -D$(SYSTYPE)
Citando Thomas Lotterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
When compiling postfix with[_whoson
When compiling postfix with:
/opkg/bin/openpkg rpm --define 'with_fdsetsize yes' --define 'with_ldap yes'
--define 'with_mysql yes' --define 'with_sasl yes' --define 'with_ssl yes'
--define 'with_whoson yes' --rebuild
ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/release/2.1/SRC/postfix-2.1.4-2.1.0.src.rpm || exit $?
I
from an instalation ?
Thanks again,
Alex
Citando Michael van Elst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 05:55:22PM -0300, Alexander Belck wrote:
Is this constant use of --force normal ?
The build tool will always use --force if it updates a package. This
asks rpm to do two things
After I build all packages (except postfix that doesn't compile), but shurly
twice the openpkg-2.1.0, if I run openpkg build -Ua it always whants to rebuild
openpkg-2.1.0.
Why is this happining ? openpkg-2.1.0 is already installed
Thanks,
Alex
--
ATIX Tecnologia e Com Ltda
Tel.: +55-(11)
Citando Michael van Elst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 07:29:30PM -0300, Alexander Belck wrote:
There is realy a huge difference in size. The modular apche is about 300K,
while
the one I build in OpenPkg is about 6M. Normaly I see several instances of
apache running (about
As I'm unable to build apache --with=mod_php_pear I was wondering if I could do
something similar as done with modular apache.
In my previus instalations, I installed apache, then I downloaded a updated
version of PEAR from HORDE (since I couldn't upgrade enouth the pear package
from the distro)
Citando Michael van Elst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 08:51:45AM -0300, Alexander Belck wrote:
As an ISP you should not run a single Apache with mod_php for more than
one customer. PHP safe mode is a myth :-)
Do I need a hole new OpenPkg instalation with a diferent opkg_root
I run the test script from horde over the apache I build with OpenPkg and it
complains of modules that I could not find in the apache.spec. Is there some
diferent name or can I install aditional php_modules ?
Horde_complains:
# MCAL Support: No
# Mcrypt Support: No
PEAR *** That I expected, as
that compiled without complaining, but horde still does not recognize mcrypt
support
Alex
Citando Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
I run the test script from horde over the apache I build with OpenPkg and it
complains of modules that I could not find
Why does a static build of apache with_mod_php_pear conflicts with the static
build of php in OpenPkg 2.0 ?
I supose this is resolved in some way in the current branch, as Bill Campbell
was able to install php with_pear and apache in a way to satisfy HORDEs
requirement of pear.
Should this be
25, 2004 at 08:51:45AM -0300, Alexander Belck wrote:
Hi,
How can I avaliate the amount of memory efectivly used ?
I think that frequenly apache processes are just waiting for a connection
and
will hope that in this situation the data reserved for all modules are
relativly
small
, Alexander Belck wrote:
Alex,
To build apache with php it requires php, so I build and installed php
first.
only the with_suphp requires the php package. Even mod_php uses the php
that is embedded into the apache package and does not require the php
package.
openpkg rpm -Uhv /opkg
just whant to be able to have an apache+php capable tu run HORDE.
Thanks,
Alex
Citando Alexander Belck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As I thought I need to enable all php options from apache and it gots a to
long
line to type, I changed the options in apache.spec. Runing
openpkg rpm -qip apache-1.3.29
Now that I'm geting near to have apache build, I did some comparision with
previus instalations (using distros modular apache).
There is realy a huge difference in size. The modular apche is about 300K, while
the one I build in OpenPkg is about 6M. Normaly I see several instances of
apache
is the server
Thanks,
Alex
Citando Thomas Lotterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
Re Alex!
Due to build perl-* I tryed to build x11 with
openpkg build x11 | sh
where I got a lot of errors starting
I'm trying to build apache for a small ISP. Previosly I relayed on distribution
pre-build/choosen modules (seams to be preety all) and have no complains of
clients.
With OpenPkg I must choose by my one, where I am afraid to let something out
that someone could be using.
I tried to build with
1) php-imap requires imap but I whant to use cyrus (as courier isn't avaible in
OpenPkg)
As I pretend to use horde, that access an imap-server using php, I think I
need php-imap, but I do not pretend to use Whashingtons imap implementation.
Is this just a compile prerequisit ?
2)
To overcome sasl x openldap I removed php_ldap and at least it trys to build
apache, but I got the following Warning:
!!*** APXS was not found, so mod_suphp will not be built! ***!!
at the end apache was build and a rpm -qip apache-...rpm includes:
apache::with_suphp = yes
Does I miss some
To build apache with php it requires php, so I build and installed php first.
After compiling apache, when I try to install it I got:
openpkg rpm -Uhv /opkg/RPM/PKG/apache-1.3.29-2.0.3.ix86-rhl7.3-opk.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
for 2.0 do not provide the openpkg-tools. Is there an other
sugested way to get the packages and all there dependencies for building ?
Thanks,
Alex
Citando Thomas Lotterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004, Alexander Belck wrote:
To build the packages I used openpkg-tools in ver 1.3
Should I expect any known problem using OpenPKG over RH-7.3 ?
I have a lot done to build a HA cluster between two RH-7.3 and whant use the
servers like OpenLdap, Apache, Postfix from OpenPkg-2.0.
So far I build tha basic openpkg-2.0.3 rom source, openpkg-tools and gcc with no
problems, but whant
What is the sintax for `openpkg build foo` and have it use something like:
-define with_zlib yes or if possible a short way like -D with_zlib
Is it possible to get the same options used when upgrading a package ? How ?
thanks,
Alex
Due to build perl-* I tryed to build x11 with
openpkg build x11 | sh
where I got a lot of errors starting with:
** ERROR: SOME X11 INFORMATION COULD NOT BE DETERMINED!!
** ERROR: SOME X11 INFORMATION COULD NOT BE DETERMINED!!
**
**
54 matches
Mail list logo
