[sc-issues] [Issue 92677] ODFF: Calc needs to implem ent IFERROR

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92677 User lvyue changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 92774] ODFF: NPV() must evaluate arguments in the order given and row-wise

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92774 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 29 03:14:21 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=63261) Patch 2.

[sc-issues] [Issue 92774] ODFF: NPV() must evaluate arguments in the order given and row-wise

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92774 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 10 07:06:11 + 2009 --- I found another problem with NPV(), see the attached file i92774_NPV_singleref.x

[sc-issues] [Issue 92774] ODFF: NPV() must evaluate arguments in the order given and row-wise

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92774 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 10 07:03:08 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=62898) Another test case. --

[sc-issues] [Issue 91351] ODFF: make HYPERLINK funct ion accept a number as second argument and ret urn it

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91351 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Fri Jun 5 09:18:47 + 2009 --- I'm very sorry, bad network. who can delete them? -

[sc-issues] [Issue 91351] ODFF: make HYPERLINK funct ion accept a number as second argument and ret urn it

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91351 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Fri Jun 5 09:15:15 + 2009 --- Hi, Eike I used PutEmpty() for ampty cell, the result is still empty, use that o

[sc-issues] [Issue 91351] ODFF: make HYPERLINK funct ion accept a number as second argument and ret urn it

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91351 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Fri Jun 5 09:14:51 + 2009 --- Hi, Eike I used PutEmpty() for ampty cell, the result is still empty, use that o

[sc-issues] [Issue 91351] ODFF: make HYPERLINK funct ion accept a number as second argument and ret urn it

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91351 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Fri Jun 5 09:14:00 + 2009 --- Hi, Eike I used PutEmpty() for ampty cell, the result is still empty, use that o

[sc-issues] [Issue 91351] ODFF: make HYPERLINK funct ion accept a number as second argument and ret urn it

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91351 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Fri Jun 5 09:10:05 + 2009 --- Hi, Eike I used PutEmpty() for ampty cell, the result is still empty, use that o

[sc-issues] [Issue 35579] Standard filter requires m ore options..

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=35579 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 3 02:59:06 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=62737) patch 2, based on DEV300m49.

[sc-issues] [Issue 92774] ODFF: NPV() must evaluate arguments in the order given and row-wise

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92774 User lvyue changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 92774] ODFF: NPV() must evaluate arguments in the order given and row-wise

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92774 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Fri May 22 07:37:53 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=62428) Patch 1, small change. --

[sc-issues] [Issue 91351] ODFF: make HYPERLINK funct ion accept a number as second argument and ret urn it

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91351 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Fri May 15 08:16:13 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=62282) A patch for this, and a question is that, for e

[sc-issues] [Issue 99140] ODFF: OOo CONVERT_ADD() wi th new conversion factors

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99140 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Thu May 14 02:39:42 + 2009 --- yes, some new unit names are added, so, there are some conflicts, like "pc" and

[sc-issues] [Issue 91351] ODFF: make HYPERLINK funct ion accept a number as second argument and ret urn it

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91351 User lvyue changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 99140] ODFF: OOo CONVERT_ADD() wi th new conversion factors

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99140 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Tue May 12 08:42:29 + 2009 --- With this patch, the count of all differences between Excel and Calc is 312, bu

[sc-issues] [Issue 99140] ODFF: OOo CONVERT_ADD() wi th new conversion factors

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99140 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Tue May 12 08:04:38 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=62184) patch 2.

[sc-issues] [Issue 99140] ODFF: OOo CONVERT_ADD() wi th new conversion factors

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99140 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Wed May 6 02:58:57 + 2009 --- Hi, Daniel thank you for the test document, I found something wrong. and after I

[sc-issues] [Issue 81214] ODFF: LOOKUP function is t oo restricted in what it accepts as arguments.

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81214 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Tue May 5 08:50:39 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=61995) based on Eike's latest patch, changed for the t

[sc-issues] [Issue 87171] Create Names doesn't work properly for 'rho'

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87171 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Fri Apr 24 05:12:59 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=61768) patch 2.

[sc-issues] [Issue 87171] Create Names doesn't work properly for 'rho'

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87171 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Thu Apr 16 02:47:16 + 2009 --- another question is that in ScRangeData::IsNameValid(), why it check the name on

[sc-issues] [Issue 87171] Create Names doesn't work properly for 'rho'

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87171 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Thu Apr 16 02:37:28 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=61593) patch 1.

[sc-issues] [Issue 87171] Create Names doesn't work properly for 'rho'

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87171 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Mon Apr 13 01:41:30 + 2009 --- I'm sorry about my last comment, that is the phenomenon in old version, please i

[sc-issues] [Issue 87171] Create Names doesn't work properly for 'rho'

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87171 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Fri Apr 10 09:00:12 + 2009 --- to Eike, I find some problems. besides the string starts with 'r', 'R', 'c' or '

[sc-issues] [Issue 78476] Horizontal Alignment in Ca lc

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78476 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Thu Apr 2 02:15:01 + 2009 --- Is there anyone who tried to change the alignment from menu? menu: Format - Alig

[sc-issues] [Issue 78476] Alignment in Calc

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78476 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Tue Mar 31 05:47:43 + 2009 --- Ok, I can submit another issue, but the summary of this issue is : Alignment in

[sc-issues] [Issue 78476] Alignment in Calc

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78476 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Mon Mar 30 07:56:42 + 2009 --- Hi, all About this issue, I still have a question. This is the horizontal case,

[sc-issues] [Issue 81214] ODFF: LOOKUP function is t oo restricted in what it accepts as arguments.

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81214 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 12 09:17:29 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=60894) patch 1.

[sc-issues] [Issue 97052] ODFF: REPLACE("123456789"; 5;0;"Q") returns an error

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97052 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 6 05:39:14 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=60766) patch 2.

[sc-issues] [Issue 97052] ODFF: REPLACE("123456789"; 5;0;"Q") returns an error

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97052 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 5 09:13:09 + 2009 --- Hi, Eike I tested REPLACE with Excel again, for pos and length arguments, Excel

[sc-issues] [Issue 99140] ODFF: OOo CONVERT_ADD() wi th new conversion factors

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99140 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 27 08:27:19 + 2009 --- Hi, Eike I have tested the problem of string length. On my computer, in OOo, the

[sc-issues] [Issue 97052] ODFF: REPLACE("123456789"; 5;0;"Q") returns an error

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97052 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Tue Feb 24 01:38:25 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=60414) patch 1.

[sc-issues] [Issue 99140] ODFF: OOo CONVERT_ADD() wi th new conversion factors

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99140 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 12 08:31:46 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=60113) Patch 1.

[sc-issues] [Issue 99140] ODFF: OOo CONVERT_ADD() wi th new conversion factors

Assigned to|er Reported by|lvyue --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 12 08:16:37 + 2009 --- CONVERT_ADD() changes. Add new conversion factors, and add prefix support

[sc-issues] [Issue 95450] Import of XLS with omitted parameters in function ADDRESS is broken

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95450 --- Additional comments from lv...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 8 07:38:37 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=59231) patch 1.

[sc-issues] [Issue 96837] ODFF: make the last parame ter of POISSON function optional

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96837 User lvyue changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 96835] ODFF: make the last parame ter of LOG function optional

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96835 User lvyue changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 96837] ODFF: make the last parame ter of POISSON function optional

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96837 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 4 08:40:11 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=58493) patch 1. ---

[sc-issues] [Issue 96837] ODFF: make the last parame ter of POISSON function optional

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96837 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 4 06:07:06 + 2008 --- Hi Regina, yes, it should be TRUE(), I just thought "1" is equal to "TRUE". bu

[sc-issues] [Issue 96835] ODFF: make the last parame ter of LOG function optional

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96835 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 3 10:19:04 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=58461) patch 1. ---

[sc-issues] [Issue 96837] ODFF: make the last parame ter of POISSON function optional

Subcomponent|programming Assigned to|lvyue Reported by|lvyue --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 3 10:15:11 + 2008 --- An issue for POISSON function, make the last parameter optional, in default, it is 1

[sc-issues] [Issue 96835] ODFF: make the last parame ter of LOG function optional

Subcomponent|programming Assigned to|lvyue Reported by|lvyue --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 3 10:09:31 + 2008 --- An issue for LOG function, make the last parameter optional, in default, it is 10

[sc-issues] [Issue 93789] ODFF: implement EUROCONVER T spreadsheet function

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93789 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 27 01:55:36 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=58337) There is something uncorrect with patch 5, so, thi

[sc-issues] [Issue 93789] ODFF: implement EUROCONVER T spreadsheet function

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93789 User lvyue changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 93789] ODFF: implement EUROCONVER T spreadsheet function

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93789 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 26 09:09:21 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=58312) patch 5. ---

[sc-issues] [Issue 93789] ODFF: implement EUROCONVER T spreadsheet function

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93789 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 21 07:27:42 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=58180) patch 4

[sc-issues] [Issue 46681] ODFF: Repeat values of sin gle array vector if used in second array dimen sion

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 24 01:29:47 + 2008 --- Tested issue 95176, the result is right in the version with patch of i46681. :) -

[sc-issues] [Issue 93789] ODFF: implement EUROCONVER T spreadsheet function

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93789 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 22 07:45:23 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=57374) patch 3 of i93789. -

[sc-issues] [Issue 93789] ODFF: implement EUROCONVER T spreadsheet function

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93789 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 20 03:04:56 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=57276) A patch with excel import, for Daniel to check and

[sc-issues] [Issue 93789] ODFF: implement EUROCONVER T spreadsheet function

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93789 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 17 09:01:58 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=56578) without Excel import/export, now. --

[sc-issues] [Issue 46681] ODFF: Repeat values of sin gle array vector if used in second array dimen sion

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 11 01:47:41 + 2008 --- Hi Eike, yes, I checked those Is...(). since they are changed, I thought they shoul

[sc-issues] [Issue 46681] ODFF: Repeat values of sin gle array vector if used in second array dimen sion

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 9 08:52:26 + 2008 --- Hi Eike, I have checked all functions in ScInterpreter that call Put... and Get...

[sc-issues] [Issue 30172] ODFF: INDIRECT function ad ditionally should interpret the exclamation ma rk as sheet-cell separator.

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30172 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 26 08:54:15 + 2008 --- Hi, Eike Thanks for your comments. :) I thought the question too complex, I thought

[sc-issues] [Issue 30172] ODFF: INDIRECT function ad ditionally should interpret the exclamation ma rk as sheet-cell separator.

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30172 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 26 07:56:09 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=56019) patch 1. ---

[sc-issues] [Issue 30172] Calc's INDIRECT function a dditionally should interpret the exclamation m ark as sheet-cell separator.

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30172 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 22 08:12:57 + 2008 --- Hi, Eike I have seen this issue several days, but I can not find out a clear clue.

[sc-issues] [Issue 90060] Wrong result of nested IF( ) functions in array context.

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90060 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 14 07:49:18 + 2008 --- Hi Eike, First, I will say sorry for my sudden left from IRC yesterday. Please forg

[sc-issues] [Issue 90060] Wrong result of nested IF( ) functions in array context.

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90060 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 14 07:26:32 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=55769) patch 4. ---

[sc-issues] [Issue 46681] ODFF: Repeat values of sin gle array vector if used in second array dimen sion

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 13 03:53:29 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=55731) patch 6, slightly changed from patch 5.

[sc-issues] [Issue 90060] Wrong result of nested IF( ) functions in array context.

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90060 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 13 02:29:30 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=55729) patch 3. ---

[sc-issues] [Issue 91146] Nested formulas crash appl ication

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91146 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 6 01:51:13 + 2008 --- Thank you :-) And I mean in the first tab "Execution Summary" of UDT Test Cases TE

[sc-issues] [Issue 91146] Nested formulas crash appl ication

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91146 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 5 06:22:50 + 2008 --- Hi Eike, I found there is something wrong with such formula: SUMPRODUCT(-Ref;.)

[sc-issues] [Issue 91146] Nested formulas crash appl ication

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91146 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 5 05:38:09 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=2) patch 1 for i91146 -

[sc-issues] [Issue 91146] Nested formulas crash appl ication

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91146 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 1 09:21:45 + 2008 --- Hi calligra, I have test many times, I don't think the question happens in "Test Ca

[sc-issues] [Issue 91146] Nested formulas crash appl ication

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91146 User lvyue changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 91372] When redo deleting Scenari o in spreadsheet, it crashes.

well. Thanks again. ;-) Lvyue - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling

[sc-issues] [Issue 90060] Wrong result of nested IF( ) functions in array context.

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90060 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 7 08:48:39 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=54976) patch 2 for i90060 -

[sc-issues] [Issue 91372] When redo deleting Scenari o in spreadsheet, it crashes.

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91372 User lvyue changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 91372] When redo deleting Scenari o in spreadsheet, it crashes.

Subcomponent|ui Assigned to|nn Reported by|lvyue --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 4 06:08:00 + 2008 --- It crashed when I did following: 1. create a new spreadsheet. 2. insert a chart. 3. create a scenario. 4. delete the

[sc-issues] [Issue 46681] ODFF: Repeat values of sin gle array vector if used in second array dimen sion

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 2 07:45:14 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=54878) patch 5. :)

[sc-issues] [Issue 90060] Wrong result of nested IF( ) functions in array context.

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90060 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 2 07:27:30 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=54876) patch 1 for i90060 -

[sc-issues] [Issue 46681] ODFF: Repeat values of sin gle array vector if used in second array dimen sion

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 12 02:37:27 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=54412) patch4. Filled the regions that remain after copyi

[sc-issues] [Issue 46681] ODFF: Repeat values of sin gle array vector if used in second array dimen sion

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 11 02:46:38 + 2008 --- Hi Eike, This is the third patch, including all the changes I made. And, so far, I

[sc-issues] [Issue 46681] ODFF: Repeat values of sin gle array vector if used in second array dimen sion

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 11 01:53:45 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=54383) patch 3. ---

[sc-issues] [Issue 46681] ODFF: Repeat values of sin gle array vector if used in second array dimen sion

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 3 07:59:53 + 2008 --- Hi Eike, In patch 2, I made some change for IF(). Applied the dynamic way to decide

[sc-issues] [Issue 46681] ODFF: Repeat values of sin gle array vector if used in second array dimen sion

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 3 07:50:12 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=54198) patch 2. ---

[sc-issues] [Issue 90060] When two IF() function are nested, the result will be wrong.

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90060 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 09:24:26 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=54015) A test case. ---

[sc-issues] [Issue 90060] When two IF() function are nested, the result will be wrong.

Subcomponent|code Assigned to|er Reported by|lvyue --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 09:20:40 + 2008 --- I find a bug in IF(), if I input =IF(cond1; IF(cond2;);), where cond2 is non-matrix thing, such as number

[tools-issues] [Issue 89383] swext: Check for ant's reg exp jar in configure

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89383 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 15 02:31:04 + 2008 --- I found something from the internet, and my problem has been solved. It is: You nee

[sc-issues] [Issue 46681] ODFF: Repeat values of sin gle array vector if used in second array dimen sion

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 9 11:55:58 + 2008 --- Hi Eike, I have a question about my system, but I'm not in office, so I can only as

[sc-issues] [Issue 46681] ODFF: Repeat values of sin gle array vector if used in second array dimen sion

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 6 08:35:50 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=53407) Changed a few functions, just for checking.

[sc-issues] [Issue 87855] ODFF: VARA and STDEVA with literal text arguments

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87855 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 11 01:54:35 + 2008 --- @er: @drking: You are welcome. And happy that I can help. :) -

[sc-issues] [Issue 46681] ODFF: Repeat values of sin gle array vector if used in second array dimen sion

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46681 User lvyue changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 87855] ODFF: VARA and STDEVA with literal text arguments

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87855 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 10 02:12:54 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=52700) patch 1. ---

[sc-issues] [Issue 87855] ODFF: VARA and STDEVA with literal text arguments

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87855 User lvyue changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 87726] Use new ScInterpreter::Get SortArray() method in all places.

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87726 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 8 05:52:32 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=52641) patch 1. ---

[sc-issues] [Issue 66930] ODFF: Make INDEX return an entire vector of a 2D array

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66930 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 20 03:53:38 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=52226) patch 1. ---

[sc-issues] [Issue 86643] ODFF: Make COUNT ignore er ror results

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86643 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 20 03:51:33 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=52225) patch 5. Reset nGlobalError, and handle all errors

[sc-issues] [Issue 66930] ODFF: Make INDEX return an entire vector of a 2D array

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66930 User lvyue changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 78781] ODFF: Excel INDEX() compat ibility

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78781 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 18 07:25:36 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=52182) patch1 -

[sc-issues] [Issue 78781] ODFF: Excel INDEX() compat ibility

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78781 User lvyue changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sc-issues] [Issue 86643] ODFF: Make COUNT ignore er ror results

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86643 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 14 08:05:17 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=52093) patch4 of i86643 ---

[sc-issues] [Issue 86721] ODFF: Function N() should return 0 also for literal text that could be i nterpreted as number.

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86721 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 13 09:05:42 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=52069) patch2 of i86721 ---

[sc-issues] [Issue 86721] ODFF: Function N() should return 0 also for literal text that could be i nterpreted as number.

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86721 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 10 06:34:43 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=51999) The first patch on N().

[sc-issues] [Issue 86643] ODFF: Make COUNT ignore er ror results

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86643 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 7 06:50:23 + 2008 --- Hi, Eike, The patch2 is not complete, I forgot the part of CASE_OCERRFUNC macro. So

[sc-issues] [Issue 86643] ODFF: Make COUNT ignore er ror results

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86643 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 7 06:48:01 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=51961) patch3 -

[sc-issues] [Issue 86643] ODFF: Make COUNT ignore er ror results

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86643 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 7 06:41:18 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=51960) Another patch --

[sc-issues] [Issue 86643] ODFF: Make COUNT ignore er ror results

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86643 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 5 03:47:03 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=51891) A patch

[sc-issues] [Issue 86171] ODFF: MINA(range)=MIN(rang e): text should equal zero also for formulas r eturning text

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86171 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 25 07:47:33 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=51700) Second patch, based on the first, simplifed the co

[sc-issues] [Issue 86171] ODFF: MINA(range)=MIN(rang e): text should equal zero also for formulas r eturning text

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86171 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 22 07:39:16 + 2008 --- Created an attachment (id=51646) A patch. ---

[sc-issues] [Issue 86171] ODFF: MINA(range)=MIN(rang e): text should equal zero also for formulas r eturning text

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86171 User lvyue changed the following: What|Old value |New value

  1   2   >