To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
User msc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 15 10:41:52 +
2010 ---
No, 3.2.1 is not likely to be developed any further.
3.3 is in Beta state, but
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
--- Additional comments from martij...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 15 10:22:50
+ 2010 ---
Is it possible to get a patch for 3.2.1? Or do I have to wait for 3.3 or 3.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 15 08:56:56 +
2010 ---
note this also happens in OOo 3.1.1 and OOo 3.2.1, so we would have a hard time
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 15 08:53:04 +
2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=71700)
document to reproduce the bug case
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
--- Additional comments from martij...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 15 06:46:19
+ 2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=71695)
Screenshot of subform properties
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
--- Additional comments from martij...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 15 06:45:45
+ 2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=71694)
Screenshot of the form
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
--- Additional comments from martij...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 15 06:44:46
+ 2010 ---
I'm sorry to inform you that the problem still exists in the latest build.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 14 15:30:57 +
2010 ---
@martijn_v: as the Beta release is one month old, it would be even better to
tes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 14 12:31:54 +
2010 ---
/me seems to remember that we fixed something like this on the way towards 3.3.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=114492
Issue #|114492
Summary|Base form: Master/Slave Fields not working in combinat
|ion with OR filter
Compone
16 matches
Mail list logo