[dba-issues] [Issue 80646] timestamp_and_vendor.patch not needed anymore

2007-11-05 Thread rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80646 User rene changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 80646] timestamp_and_vendor.patch not needed anymore

2007-11-05 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80646 User fs changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 80646] timestamp_and_vendor.patch not needed anymore

2007-11-05 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80646 User fs changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 80646] timestamp_and_vendor.patch not needed anymore

2007-11-03 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80646 User fs changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 80646] timestamp_and_vendor.patch not needed anymore

2007-11-03 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80646 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 3 21:00:19 + 2007 --- You're absolutely right. The "perhaps" means: There is a rule to not have more than

[dba-issues] [Issue 80646] timestamp_and_vendor.patch not needed anymore

2007-11-03 Thread rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80646 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 3 20:49:37 + 2007 --- fs: TBH, I don't see how that makes sense. you already removed most of the patches

[dba-issues] [Issue 80646] timestamp_and_vendor.patch not needed anymore

2007-11-03 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80646 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 3 20:18:03 + 2007 --- will do (perhaps only after dba24c with issue 83079 is integrated, since dba24c is

[dba-issues] [Issue 80646] timestamp_and_vendor.patch not needed anymore

2007-11-03 Thread rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80646 User rene changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 80646] timestamp_and_vendor.patch not needed anymore

2007-11-03 Thread rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80646 User rene changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 80646] timestamp_and_vendor.patch not needed anymore

2007-08-13 Thread rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80646 Issue #|80646 Summary|timestamp_and_vendor.patch not needed anymore Component|Database access Version|current