To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
User kso changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 6 13:00:16 -0700
2006 ---
cloned grist of the sal shrink to i#70166#
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 6 12:35:06 -0700
2006 ---
> A small test on Windows revealed that after removing all textenc functions
> from
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 6 07:56:29 -0700
2006 ---
A small test on Windows revealed that after removing all textenc functions from
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 6 07:37:09 -0700
2006 ---
Michael, Kendy, would you consider the option to factor out the conversion
tables?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 6 03:59:33 -0700
2006 ---
(I forgot to emphasize that the current implementation does not link to Gtk+,
just
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 6 03:55:24 -0700
2006 ---
pl: X11 is in the memory for sure, glib most probably as well (and has just
libc a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 6 03:35:34 -0700
2006 ---
> The problem is that to support all possible
> variables you have to write a lot o
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 6 03:31:18 -0700
2006 ---
Would linking sal dynamically really hurt ? The exports out of that are c only
and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 6 03:07:49 -0700
2006 ---
mba: thanks for the great feedback:
"or you can link against sal and use the e
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 6 02:47:30 -0700
2006 ---
wrt. the bug in the MD5 hash: this is a known issue (though only available in
our i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 6 02:32:51 -0700
2006 ---
As it looks your patch only works if the bootstraprc does only contain
SYSUSERCONFI
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 3 05:58:26 -0700
2006 ---
hro, cd: The deadlines for 2.1 are approaching - any chance to have a look at
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 07:46:11 -0700
2006 ---
I've updated the patches to create exactly the same OSL pipe as OOo currently
does
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 4 09:47:39 -0700
2006 ---
cd: I am sorry, but nonavailability of the Win32 implementation is not an
argument
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 4 08:59:42 -0700
2006 ---
> I know that you are only interested into a Unix solution, but I think we
> should
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 4 08:40:36 -0700
2006 ---
cd->kendy: I am sorry, but I am very busy with OOo 2.0.4 show stoppers.
The pipe se
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60696
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
20 matches
Mail list logo