[framework-issues] [Issue 64357] javaldx search too promis cuously

2006-05-19 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64357 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[framework-issues] [Issue 64357] javaldx search too promis cuously

2006-04-27 Thread quenelle
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64357 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 27 16:31:08 -0700 2006 --- Here is what I would recommend: 1. learn to identify which platform you are on:

[framework-issues] [Issue 64357] javaldx search too promis cuously

2006-04-27 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64357 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 27 01:33:16 -0700 2006 --- We do not distinguish Solaris and Linux when searching the file system. But you hav

[framework-issues] [Issue 64357] javaldx search too promis cuously

2006-04-26 Thread quenelle
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64357 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 26 15:17:34 -0700 2006 --- Is it possible to search in different directories depending on which version of UN

[framework-issues] [Issue 64357] javaldx search too promis cuously

2006-04-25 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64357 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[framework-issues] [Issue 64357] javaldx search too promis cuously

2006-04-21 Thread quenelle
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64357 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 21 09:16:51 -0700 2006 --- Solaris has a very well-defined set of places that Java JREs can be stored. It wou

[framework-issues] [Issue 64357] javaldx search too promis cuously

2006-04-21 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64357 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 21 08:58:30 -0700 2006 --- >Is there a command line option to open office that specifies the full pathname to

[framework-issues] [Issue 64357] javaldx search too promis cuously

2006-04-20 Thread quenelle
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64357 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 20 12:55:26 -0700 2006 --- Is there a command line option to open office that specifies the full pathname to t

[framework-issues] [Issue 64357] javaldx search too promis cuously

2006-04-18 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64357 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 18 05:00:57 -0700 2006 --- We do not search for particular directory names, such as JDK1.5.1 etc. At least not

[framework-issues] [Issue 64357] javaldx search too promis cuously

2006-04-13 Thread quenelle
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64357 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 13 12:53:04 -0700 2006 --- Could you summarize the different directories that are searched for a JRE? Is this

[framework-issues] [Issue 64357] javaldx search too promis cuously

2006-04-13 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64357 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 13 09:03:40 -0700 2006 --- After further consideration, I think we should not reinvent the wheel here and requ

[framework-issues] [Issue 64357] javaldx search too promis cuously

2006-04-13 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64357 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 13 06:59:34 -0700 2006 --- Unfortunately it is not defined where the Java installation has to be. Different ve

[framework-issues] [Issue 64357] javaldx search too promis cuously

2006-04-13 Thread of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64357 User of changed the following: What|Old value |New value