To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 9 05:27:07 -0700
2006 ---
*** Issue 61035 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User hi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 30 05:19:30 -0800
2006 ---
Created an attachment (id=35389)
test plan to be included to spec
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User hi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 17 01:28:32 -0800
2006 ---
committed
-
Pl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 16 12:50:07 -0800
2006 ---
->pl: the following patch corrects some glitch in the CWS.
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 16 01:58:38 -0800
2006 ---
committed patch 7. The seemingly missing patch6 is most likely a caching issue
with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 15 14:14:52 -0800
2006 ---
->pl. Latest patch follows, contains changes in config.
The patch before this (id=3
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 15 08:52:05 -0800
2006 ---
mmp: no TOC and bookmarks are not dependant on tagged PDF. The TOC makes up
another
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 15 08:10:04 -0800
2006 ---
Sven, is TaggedPDF related to the export of bookmarks/table of contents? I
suppose
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 15 08:06:35 -0800
2006 ---
If I don't see other comments, I'm going to do:
- Export notes def -> false;
- alig
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 15 07:42:31 -0800
2006 ---
+1 for not having tagged pdf as default. There is no benefit for normal users as
th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 15 07:34:15 -0800
2006 ---
As always the exact increase by tagged PDF is dependent on the actualy content.
How
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 15 07:18:56 -0800
2006 ---
Are you kidding? 50% increase in file size for added tagged PDF??
If you are nearly
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 15 07:08:54 -0800
2006 ---
Stop it, tagged PDF should NOT be the default. Saving 1% by optimizing
whitespace a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 15 07:03:11 -0800
2006 ---
Hi Giuseppe,
- can you please activate Tagged PDF by default (spec row 75)
- Export
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 15 03:44:06 -0800
2006 ---
1. these are the fruits of your work
2. it's open source
3. ooo-build will get the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 15 02:53:50 -0800
2006 ---
You are all welcome. Mind if I forward the patches for 2.0.2 to the ooo-build
peopl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 15 02:07:31 -0800
2006 ---
As far as i know the translation process is like the help process an automated
one
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 15 00:59:56 -0800
2006 ---
Overnight I built OOo 2.0.2 with some other languages enabled, and I discovered
tha
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 14 13:03:39 -0800
2006 ---
->pl.
Latest patch: latest version of German strings, CTL behavior implemented (see
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 14 07:29:29 -0800
2006 ---
->mmp option b) above, may be there are other 'little things' to clean up.
re: end-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 14 05:39:02 -0800
2006 ---
8% is a lot. I would recommend to keep the linebreaks untouched, but the white
spac
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 14 04:46:48 -0800
2006 ---
->mmp.
Re: help btn: so it stays as it is, good.
Re: i43362: I had only a very quic
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User mmp changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 14 03:14:57 -0800
2006 ---
One thought on issue 43362: the jpeg issue is a non issue; if the original is
jpeg
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 14 02:00:09 -0800
2006 ---
Hi Giuseppe, can you please take a look at i43362? Is there an easy, straight
forwa
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 14 01:39:45 -0800
2006 ---
Good point. For now the Help button stays where it is: Far right. No need to
touch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 13 13:51:55 -0800
2006 ---
Oops, in the former comment I wrote:
"
hence the current help button position, with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 13 13:48:31 -0800
2006 ---
->mmp. In the spec the help button was moved to the bottom left. Presently I'm
usin
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 13 09:12:59 -0800
2006 ---
spec update (I think we are nearly done)
"First page is left" depends on CTL settin
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 13 08:44:46 -0800
2006 ---
Spec update:
Help button is bottom left
Changes in German strings “Benutzungs-” to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 13 05:11:27 -0800
2006 ---
pl->mmp: Since you seem to like the acrobat dialog so much, just have a look
there
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 13 05:02:06 -0800
2006 ---
"Schnittstelle" vs "Oberfläche" > I'll chekc with LingTool. Might take some time
"B
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 13 04:22:14 -0800
2006 ---
Checked in the latest patch.
pl->mmp: "Benutzungsschnittstelle" ? Shouldn't that b
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 13 03:58:03 -0800
2006 ---
->mmp.
Re: "Open on page x". I think the same. If in the future some users ask for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 13 03:38:42 -0800
2006 ---
->mmp. Please have a look at the two examples. Both should open facing. The L2R
exa
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 13 03:33:51 -0800
2006 ---
Yes, we do not support "Open on page x". I am not convinced that this feature
is e
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 13 02:28:18 -0800
2006 ---
spec update with Giuseppe's changes.
Regarding the "First page left" option: I dun
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 12 08:36:31 -0800
2006 ---
->pl.
I'm going to attach the latest patch, lastest changes from spec (March 10th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 10 08:49:16 -0800
2006 ---
Re: 'Display document title'
yes you are right. The default should stay as "Display
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 10 03:19:41 -0800
2006 ---
commited the latest patch, but please send further patches against the cws
branch;
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 9 13:55:15 -0800
2006 ---
->pl.
New patch, provides the lastest change from spec:
- Final English strings & m
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 9 05:31:08 -0800
2006 ---
- mnemonics in spec are final.
- The Reset button should go away.
- Note the sectio
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 9 04:41:27 -0800
2006 ---
Yes, there was a typo in "Resize window to initial page"
Another typo is in the sti
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 9 04:33:23 -0800
2006 ---
oops, did an involuntary reassignment, sorry
corrected "Window Options" to "Window
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 9 04:24:08 -0800
2006 ---
beppec56->mmp. String at line 59 of spec reads: Resize window to inition page,
shou
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 9 04:14:46 -0800
2006 ---
beppec56->pl. Yesterday night I sent the patch and today I realized there is a
typo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 8 13:58:14 -0800
2006 ---
The attached patch contains all the changes to the spec draft.
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 8 05:40:49 -0800
2006 ---
After querying around somewhat the solution to the help and helpid issue goes
like
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 8 02:34:58 -0800
2006 ---
Good news: i talked to mh and he told me that i can check in your patch now; the
JC
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 7 14:17:19 -0800
2006 ---
I've implemented the Page Layout behaviour, well, it was really needed.
ASA I've ch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 6 15:11:49 -0800
2006 ---
beppec56->mmp. I've modified the tabs as per spec draft.
I attached two bitmap of t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 6 09:04:02 -0800
2006 ---
The spec is "work in progress". Many strings are subject to change to conform
with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User mmp changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 6 04:12:27 -0800
2006 ---
Just talked to mmp, he mentioned some things:
- on the second tab page in the seco
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 3 04:33:03 -0800
2006 ---
Did the compile and everything seems too work flawlessly, great job. :-) I could
no
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 1 05:16:48 -0800
2006 ---
beppec56->pl.
The attachement is the patch containing all the changes I worked out
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 1 05:25:29 -0800
2006 ---
Will compile the patch and try to grab hold of mmp. Regarding the help system i
hav
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 27 02:40:03 -0800
2006 ---
Looks very good to me. If it's fine by you we should stay with this layot. In
the m
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 27 02:27:20 -0800
2006 ---
I've already changed the dialog as you propose. I attach the two screenshots of
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 27 01:26:33 -0800
2006 ---
Currently adding the officecfg project to the CWS, yes please add a patch to the
Co
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 24 10:57:53 -0800
2006 ---
beppec56->pl.
OK, I'll divide the preferences page, but two radio buttons on differ
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 24 09:04:10 -0800
2006 ---
I have applied the patched and played a little, works like a charm. I hope that
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 22 06:45:27 -0800
2006 ---
> Reading a string [snip...]the binary resource files are already UTF-8
I don't und
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 22 05:06:16 -0800
2006 ---
Contrary to my earlier comment i was bidden to wait with the commit until your
JCA
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 21 13:34:09 -0800
2006 ---
beppec56->pl. The following is a patch to apply to the pdfexportimprove CWS to
upda
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 21 07:03:08 -0800
2006 ---
beppec56->pl. I'm almost finished with the implementation, I still have some
test t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 21 07:18:27 -0800
2006 ---
you can attach the patch, and since you already send your JCA it should be no
probl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 7 02:03:12 -0800
2006 ---
Actually the cross references basically are links, only they do not have an
absolut
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 7 00:00:42 -0800
2006 ---
beppec56->pl. Re: the links, I thought about differentiating the hyperlinks in
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 31 06:14:14 -0800
2006 ---
Links (internal as well as external) are mostly the same, they only differ in
the k
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 31 04:51:06 -0800
2006 ---
beppec56->pl. Further comments.
Q1. I hardcode into the code the link generation. T
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 30 02:21:13 -0800
2006 ---
Here some answers to the questions in the doc.
Next, a few questions.
Q1. The docu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
97 matches
Mail list logo
