To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
User hi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 14:23:38 +
2008 ---
For me it looks like that Adobe is not much interested in PostScript and the PPD
sp
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 14:19:24 +
2008 ---
>From what I have heard from my co-worker at Apple who interfaces with Adobe,
>the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 13:53:01 +
2008 ---
Wow, if people invested as much time in coding as in political statements, a
patch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
User tillkamppeter changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 13:36:19 +
2008 ---
I completely agree this is a useful extension and we should support it. However
I s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 13:22:59 +
2008 ---
You are correct that Adobe made the PPD spec, however they haven't updated it
in 1
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 11:56:01 +
2008 ---
Last time I looked Adobe made the PPD standard, not the Linux Foundation.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 11:27:09 +
2008 ---
I'm OK with this being an RFE, but be aware that the OpenPrinting group of the
Linu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
User pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 20 16:38:40 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=56661)
French-localized PPD file
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 20 16:38:12 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=56660)
Globalized PPD file
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94111
Issue #|94111
Summary|Globalized PPD files are not translated in print dialo
|g
Component|gsl
15 matches
Mail list logo