[l10n-issues] [Issue 42091] Base - Some items were not translated to Brazilian Portuguese

2005-04-19 Thread thorstenziehm
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42091 User thorstenziehm changed the following: What|Old value |New value ==

[l10n-issues] [Issue 42091] Base - Some items were not translated to Brazilian Portuguese

2005-04-17 Thread rafaelda
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42091 User rafaelda changed the following: What|Old value |New value ===

[l10n-issues] [Issue 42091] Base - Some items were not translated to Brazilian Portuguese

2005-04-05 Thread thorstenziehm
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42091 User thorstenziehm changed the following: What|Old value |New value ==

[l10n-issues] [Issue 42091] Base - Some items were not translated to Brazilian Portuguese

2005-03-23 Thread iano
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42091 User iano changed the following: What|Old value |New value ===

[l10n-issues] [Issue 42091] Base - Some items were not translated to Brazilian Portuguese

2005-03-22 Thread msc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42091 User msc changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[l10n-issues] [Issue 42091] Base - Some items were not translated to Brazilian Portuguese

2005-03-21 Thread ft
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42091 User ft changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[l10n-issues] [Issue 42091] Base - Some items were not translated to Brazilian Portuguese

2005-03-21 Thread ft
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42091 User ft changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[l10n-issues] [Issue 42091] Base - Some items were not translated to Brazilian Portuguese

2005-03-19 Thread rafaelda
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42091 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 19 18:31:04 -0800 2005 --- The 2.0 Beta (english) was released. This issue is still present in 1.9.84. --

[l10n-issues] [Issue 42091] Base - Some items were not translated to Brazilian Portuguese

2005-03-19 Thread rafaelda
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42091 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 19 18:29:57 -0800 2005 --- The 2.0 Beta (english) was released. This issue is still present in 1.9.84. --

[l10n-issues] [Issue 42091] Base - Some items were not translated to Brazilian Portuguese

2005-03-11 Thread mh
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42091 User mh changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[l10n-issues] [Issue 42091] Base - Some items were not translated to Brazilian Portuguese

2005-03-06 Thread thackert
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42091 User thackert changed the following: What|Old value |New value ===

[l10n-issues] [Issue 42091] Base - Some items were not translated to Brazilian Portuguese

2005-02-19 Thread rafaelda
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42091 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 14:41:02 -0800 2005 --- This issue is still present in 1.9.79. ---

[l10n-issues] [Issue 42091] Base - Some items were not translated to Brazilian Portuguese

2005-02-09 Thread rafaelda
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42091 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 9 20:31:59 -0800 2005 --- This issue is still present in 1.9.77. ---