[porting-issues] [Issue 63775] endian.h should also do 6 4-bit ints

2006-04-28 Thread mikeleib
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63775 User mikeleib changed the following: What|Old value |New value ===

[porting-issues] [Issue 63775] endian.h should also do 6 4-bit ints

2006-04-28 Thread mikeleib
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63775 User mikeleib changed the following: What|Old value |New value ===

[porting-issues] [Issue 63775] endian.h should also do 6 4-bit ints

2006-04-28 Thread mikeleib
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63775 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 28 04:45:43 -0700 2006 --- Incorporating sb's feedback Fix is in configdbbe

[porting-issues] [Issue 63775] endian.h should also do 6 4-bit ints

2006-03-29 Thread sb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63775 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 29 23:56:04 -0800 2006 --- ...also, the definitions of OSL_HI/LODWORD should read #define OSL_HIDWORD(q) ((sa

[porting-issues] [Issue 63775] endian.h should also do 6 4-bit ints

2006-03-29 Thread sb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63775 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 29 23:50:19 -0800 2006 --- Two comments: "0xull" is non-portable and should use "SAL_CONST_UINT64(0xF

[porting-issues] [Issue 63775] endian.h should also do 6 4-bit ints

2006-03-29 Thread mikeleib
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63775 User mikeleib changed the following: What|Old value |New value ===