To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 24 06:42:56 +
2007 ---
Yes, I've updated my cygwin installation now and the problem has vanished.
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 23 16:52:07 +
2007 ---
Looks like the cygwin1.dll update helped.
obo: can you please confirm this solutio
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
User fridrich_strba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 23 08:30:22 +
2007 ---
OK, build with new cygwin1.dll and dmake/dag.c patch was OK.
Build without dag.c p
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 23 04:31:29 +
2007 ---
The build with new snapshot lib is in sw now. Still with the patch. Will try
witho
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 22 17:42:12 +
2007 ---
The build failed almost immediatelly in sal, so I installed new snapshot
library,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 22 17:05:41 +
2007 ---
Will try it for next build (new one is running now).
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 22 17:00:17 +
2007 ---
Can you please try using a Cygwin snapshot?
It's easy and painless. Get the latest
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 22 14:36:00 +
2007 ---
My m210 build failed even with dmake/dag.c patch included...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 18 06:48:57 +
2007 ---
obo: great - I'm not alone.
In this case, the error is from guw.exe.
Unfortunatel
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
User obo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 15:06:04 +
2007 ---
Pavel,
if we are really (un-)lucky and get a stackdump from dmake we can find out
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 05:36:25 +
2007 ---
I'll try to find it once the build breaks next time.
I have just uploaded my m209,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 00:16:48 +
2007 ---
I thought you actually got a *.exe.stackdump file. If that would have beed the
case
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 15 14:39:31 +
2007 ---
The next build without -html --dontgraboutput and with dag.c patch is in
binfilter
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 15 13:46:58 +
2007 ---
How to generate it? build just reports error code 139.
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 15 10:57:52 +
2007 ---
Can you please attach the dmake crashdump ?
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 15 06:28:59 +
2007 ---
Hmm, I started m209 builds with --html --dontgraboutput *and* dmake/dag.c patch
fr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 13 04:23:49 +
2007 ---
vq: after applying your patch the build is still runing - now in binfilter.
This b
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 17:31:53 +
2007 ---
Will do.
BTW - the last build, ie. without --html --dontgraboutput AND with build
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 16:12:00 +
2007 ---
Pavel, even if you would find that switching the parameters to build can turn
of th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 05:22:45 +
2007 ---
The build without --html and --dontgraboutput:
officecfg and Aborting.: Argument l
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 18:13:52 +
2007 ---
The build with --html but without --dontgraboutput crashed in comphelper again.
Th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 14:22:04 +
2007 ---
Clean m208 with build -- -v fails in comphelper with "Argument list too long".
The
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 13:39:23 +
2007 ---
BTW - I undid tg_config.mk change in m208 and the build still SIGSEGVed in moz,
so
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 10 17:29:19 +
2007 ---
Hmm, I removed --html --dontgraboutput from build's command line and the build
STI
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 10 15:11:11 +
2007 ---
I do build with
build --html
this shuffles with fds as well. I'm now trying anoth
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 10 14:01:26 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 75883 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 2 06:58:49 +
2007 ---
vq: Sorry I haven't yet tested your patch, because I'm now building m202 and
m202+
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 28 00:18:10 +
2007 ---
As discussed on IRC. This might help, it doesn't allocate extra memory to hold
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 27 04:45:31 +
2007 ---
mkdir ../../wntmsci10.pro/misc/dialog/
/bin/rm -f ../../wntmsci10.pro/misc/dialog/r
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 26 05:32:57 +
2007 ---
Tried that now:
/bin/rm -f ../../wntmsci10.pro/misc/dialog/recfloat.src
guw.exe -l
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 13:56:38 +
2007 ---
Pavel, you can get a little debug information by adding the -ldbg switch, and
every
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 06:29:55 +
2007 ---
vq: can I turn on some debugging in guw? Maybe the arglist is really too long
afte
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 20:57:28 +
2007 ---
OK, with m206, I got this:
-+ creating a module file
mkdir -p
../../.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 7 19:14:56 +
2007 ---
"this *should* be reproducible" :-) Volker, we are on Windows :-)
I think that it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 7 15:19:23 +
2007 ---
Hi Pavel,
(I missed this one completely, sorry)
actually I have no idea what's go
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74837
Issue #|74837
Summary|Execvp error. Aborting.: Argument list too long in li
|bwpd
Component|porting
47 matches
Mail list logo
