To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 3 12:01:19 +
2008 ---
This option won't get implemented.
The overwhelming majority of our users seemed to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User mr_smyle changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 19 23:02:30 +
2007 ---
Thanks guys, I´ve waited for this for more than year. It´s cool now.
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User kami_ changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 6 11:30:39 +
2007 ---
Well, let's call it a collision between two features. :-)
Thanks for finding it!
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 6 09:09:57 +
2007 ---
The implementation is buggy: Issue 76699
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 23 15:57:24 +
2007 ---
I hope you don't misunderstand Oliver's comment: "WONTFIX" doesn't mean that we
don'
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 23 10:36:08 +
2007 ---
->hubertf: No, there's no use in reopening this issue. It would then be closed
as wo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 23 10:16:42 +
2007 ---
Ok i understand mba's point of vue...
but I think this bug must remain open until th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 23 09:45:24 +
2007 ---
->hubertf: Please read again the comment from mba from Fri Feb 2 17:50:07 +
2007
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 23 09:38:29 +
2007 ---
it would be better to reopen this bug, because the functionnality as been "half
impl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 23 09:29:22 +
2007 ---
True... looks abysmal. What about reopening this bug then (or should someone
create
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User hubertf changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 23 09:18:18 +
2007 ---
you said : "Then all pages are aligned to the left border of the widest page."
Why
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 15 11:39:11 +
2007 ---
This has been answered here several times. Please read.
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 14 18:29:12 +
2007 ---
mmp wrote: "Then all pages are aligned to the left border of the widest page."
If I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 05:45:35 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 76234 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 5 10:59:08 +
2007 ---
Version 2 of the spec text:
If the horizontal scrollbar has nothing to do then the p
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User mmp changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 4 07:25:44 +
2007 ---
The Child Workspace os92 containing the changes is still not integrated. Once it
is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User hubertf changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 4 06:41:16 +
2007 ---
I've downloaded the new dev snapshot at
http://download.openoffice.org/680/index.htm
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 25 18:07:53 +
2007 ---
No, this is impossible. 2.2 is already overdue.
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 24 03:01:58 +
2007 ---
I see some people have worked on this. Many thanks! One question though: If
it's a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 13 14:27:33 +
2007 ---
Is there a snapshot planned to test the new behaviour?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User kear changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 21 17:21:42 +
2007 ---
Please use dev@sw.openoffice.org for any discussion.
Issuezilla should be reserved f
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 21 16:18:08 +
2007 ---
> With this fixed people will have to look closer
> to find something 'wrong' with t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 21 16:07:20 +
2007 ---
Yay fixed
can't wait till 2.3 then :D
Sorry if my comments annoyed you mba, just t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 21 07:28:34 +
2007 ---
First: we *have* also paying customers that use StarOffice. BTW: interestingly
none
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 20 22:54:23 +
2007 ---
"Fine, so if these numbers are correct (where did you get them from?) only 26%
of
t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 16 22:01:41 +
2007 ---
Please read at the least the last comments before you add comments that don't
add an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 16 20:34:58 +
2007 ---
Like other users, I've fired up Word today at work and wow, what a relief -- a
cente
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 13 00:18:00 +
2007 ---
PS: when you talk about this issue affecting only "26%" of users, it at least
has a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 13 00:06:08 +
2007 ---
I would -really- like this in OpenOffice, I don't think the development guys
unders
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 12 17:56:20 +
2007 ---
I think that as long as the portrait view is centered, that will please the most
amo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 12 17:12:40 +
2007 ---
@peter:
> If the whole document is centered, presumably on the widest (landscape)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User peterlairo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 12 15:46:01 +
2007 ---
Most people have a resolution of 1024x768, and only 26% have a resolution higher
tha
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 12 14:22:56 +
2007 ---
Slightly means: it depends on the width of your screen. In the worst case it is
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 12 14:13:40 +
2007 ---
"So if you have a landscape and a portrait page in the same document the
landscape p
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 8 18:37:50 +
2007 ---
@os / mba: So just to confirm - you are planning to address this issue in 2.3
(or 2.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 8 12:50:41 +
2007 ---
mba, of note, I do know I can just make the window smaller and center it
manually, h
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 8 12:44:00 +
2007 ---
mba, ok - I fully understand there will be other things to take into account.
I'm ju
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 8 12:43:05 +
2007 ---
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOoRelease221
http://wiki.services.openoffi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 8 12:35:36 +
2007 ---
And what is the timeframe (ie. estimated release dates) for 2.2.1 and 2.3
respective
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 8 12:34:25 +
2007 ---
BTW: You don't need to stress your neck. As long as Writer can't display more
than o
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 8 12:27:11 +
2007 ---
This is not my decision, it's up to the release committee to decide this.
We have th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 8 12:19:54 +
2007 ---
mba, I believe most of the people here consider this a bug fix, not an
enhancement.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 3 10:03:38 +
2007 ---
Since it is impossible to unsubscribe this issue - I have changed my mail to a
fake
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User peterlairo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 3 01:16:49 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 50137 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 2 17:52:19 +
2007 ---
g...
Error in last sentence:
s/single/simple
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 2 17:50:07 +
2007 ---
I wonder if we could implement the feature in two steps. The most problematic
part i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 3 00:40:41 -0800
2007 ---
I would like to have things centered too, but on the other hand, now the canvas
is c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 2 19:31:20 -0800
2007 ---
I would simply like to agree with those who have said this is quite possibly the
mos
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User pagalmes changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 18 14:36:23 -0800
2006 ---
It's really a pain to work hours looking on the left.
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 14 12:29:56 -0800
2006 ---
Left alignment is reason #1 I'm not using OOWriter as my default editor but only
use
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 22 09:06:24 -0800
2006 ---
Please add an option to align the page center. Currently, to center the page,
you ca
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 22 06:32:07 -0800
2006 ---
This is currently keeping me from using OOo. It may "only" be a matter of
aesthetic
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User pmike changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User mmp changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 13 01:11:23 -0800
2006 ---
*** Issue 71474 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 7 12:10:51 -0800
2006 ---
Thank you very much for letting us know.
I believe, each task needs certain time, b
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 7 00:31:01 -0800
2006 ---
I've been asked to clarify what happens with this bug. Here is my reply (I hope,
all
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 5 05:57:26 -0800
2006 ---
Well I addressed kpalagin´s request and sent the following email to Mr. Martens:
>
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 5 00:29:13 -0800
2006 ---
May I suggest that somebody sends pollite message to the lead of Wordprocessor
proj
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User kpalagin changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User utomo99 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User khirano changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
User jeongkyu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 16 14:40:40 -0700
2006 ---
Well nothing new concerning this issue in OOo 2.0.4. Big disappointment.
Could someo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 12 23:37:26 -0700
2006 ---
To celebrate the FIFTH anniversary of this bug I wrote a little piece here (also
abo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 5 17:46:42 -0700
2006 ---
The 5 year wait for this issue and several other small bugs or annoyances, and
espec
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 25 13:09:25 -0700
2006 ---
Opened: Tue Oct 2 15:34:00 -0700 2001
The bug report for this is nearing its 5th bi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 29 10:17:50 -0700
2006 ---
I was looking for this particular matter on the neooffice.org forums. Good to
hear i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 21 16:19:38 -0700
2006 ---
Now fix it !!
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 19 04:19:24 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 47726 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 27 20:36:26 -0800
2005 ---
This is the first thing I noticed upon install. Very annoying to have a
zoomed-out
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 22:43:33 -0800
2005 ---
The general alignment of pages in OO.o should be 'centred' rather than left. If
any
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 9 20:54:51 -0800
2005 ---
This issue is still present in 1.9.77.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 6 12:56:17 -0800
2005 ---
Yes I'm also currious what is happenening with this issue. I would be so happy,
if
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 5 13:42:45 -0800
2005 ---
What is the status of this issue? There are many duplicates - it seems to me
that th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 5 08:37:51 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 42099 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1761
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 17 23:49:55 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 40840 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
99 matches
Mail list logo