To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 28 04:58:08 -0800
2006 ---
in CWS ww8perf01
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
User mikeleib changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 16 04:41:40 -0800
2006 ---
This patch breaks building without STLport when using gcc 4.0 or 4.1.
/usr/src/ooo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 04:42:21 -0800
2006 ---
I think it's too late for 2.0.2, mainly because the final build is going to
start t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 08:45:17 -0800
2006 ---
It's not a showstopper to keep the performance as it is.
I can't judge a possible
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 07:33:43 -0800
2006 ---
Perhaps the fact the ww8 imports are slow is a defect?
WRT to memory consumption
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 00:57:09 -0800
2006 ---
flr->mba:
Do you think its possible to get this into 2.0.2? Technically the patch s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 00:11:33 -0800
2006 ---
timar -> for FSF.hu build
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 8 17:22:45 -0800
2006 ---
I would like to get this in 2.0.2, if possible. Any chance of that?
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 7 03:48:08 -0800
2006 ---
up to flr as maintainer IMO.
cmc->flr: you could reassign this to mikeleib for him
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 6 08:24:29 -0800
2006 ---
The memory usage is relatively small, when you look at the size of the structs.
Th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 6 01:25:01 -0800
2006 ---
I don't really mind either way, the intent of the original code was angled
towards
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 6 01:00:42 -0800
2006 ---
Hi cmc,
do you have any suggestions regarding this patch? Maybe its better regardi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 5 14:57:00 -0800
2006 ---
I have a cws open for this, ww8perf01, but CVS tells me I don't have commit
rights
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
User mikeleib changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 09:10:25 -0800
2006 ---
As far as I know it works fine. It's been in ooo-build for a good while now.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 06:35:08 -0800
2006 ---
Hi!
Are there any information about this patch? It is ready to use, usable or need
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055
User mikeleib changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
19 matches
Mail list logo