To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75496
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75496
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75496
User hgkamath changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 20 04:15:37 +
2007 ---
Ok, I think what-I-see, can be tied to what-you-say about this OLE-cache thingy
b
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 19 21:20:22 +
2007 ---
Yeah, this really sounds that the OLE cache is full.
Please ry changing the cache s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75496
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75496
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 18 17:39:45 +
2007 ---
The number "21" lets me think that the pause is caused by the OLE cache being
fille
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75496
User hgkamath changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75496
Issue #|75496
Summary|performance penalty after 21st conversion to formula o
|bject via macro
Component|Fo
