To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 7 06:31:30 +
2007 ---
Unfortunately not; code freeze for OO 2.3.1 has already been a few weeks ago.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 6 19:31:51 +
2007 ---
Is it possible to integrate this patch in OOo 2.3.1?
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 8 06:35:24 +
2007 ---
fme->parity: This cws is still being worked on. Have a look a this for the
current
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 6 17:39:58 +
2007 ---
Is there a snapshot available where this bugfix was integrated?
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 28 08:22:13 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 66449 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 28 08:05:00 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 81750 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 27 14:11:22 +
2007 ---
Is there a snapshot release available, where this bug is fixed?
Will the fix be in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 07:37:15 +
2007 ---
I observed the same behaviour as described in issue 66449. When there is a
snapshot
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 06:36:23 +
2007 ---
This might have the same root cause as i66449.
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 14 15:56:42 +
2007 ---
If it is not possible to integrate this fix in OOo 2.3. Is it possible for
2.3.1?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 14 12:30:51 +
2007 ---
parity-->fme
I forgot to say something: Thank you for fixing this bug. ;-)
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 14 12:30:04 +
2007 ---
I know but I thought that there might be a chance somehow.
My neighbour encountere
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 14 12:22:16 +
2007 ---
fme->parity: I'm sorry to say but code freeze for OOo 2.3 was 2007-08-02.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 14 12:19:13 +
2007 ---
Is it possible to integrate this fix in OpenOffice.org 2.3?
This issue is really a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
User fme changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 28 06:54:13 +
2007 ---
Funny... I'm trying this in OO 2.2 on Windows XP.
It happens something strange too
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 27 16:42:56 +
2007 ---
I tried all 3 examples and can confirm them on Debian Linux 4.0 using OOo 2.2.1.
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
User parity changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
User jolatt changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 27 15:51:45 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=47152)
Bugdoc: 211 pages of dummy text with line numberin
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80120
Issue #|80120
Summary|Line numbering is not working correctly
Component|Word processor
Version|680m222
24 matches
Mail list logo