To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64861
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64861
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64861
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64861
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 30 01:09:01 -0700
2006 ---
LinuxX86_64 is good for me.
I'd be fine with LinuxIntel becoming LinuxX86 but it w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 29 13:29:45 -0700
2006 ---
kendy: +1 for both. Caolan?
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 28 01:44:58 -0700
2006 ---
I prefer LinuxX86-64...
Similarly, what about to change LinuxIntel to eg. LinuxX86
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64861
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
