To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 08:42:59 -0800
2005 ---
ah, I guess I see
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 08:31:22 -0800
2005 ---
kendy: for what? m135? I don't do build for them atm. I stick with ooo-build-2-0
si
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 27 08:59:46 -0700
2005 ---
cmc: Right, sorry, thanks for noticing. I just took what we had in ooo-build
and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 27 08:45:29 -0700
2005 ---
kendy: that will break under some circumstances, the "NULL" passed to the
collator.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 12:13:55 -0700
2005 ---
Panbk,
I don't know where you see Japanese, Korean and Nepali support being patche
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 09:18:19 -0700
2005 ---
The posted patches do not apply cleanly to m135 :-(
Are there any updates?
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 05:45:02 -0700
2005 ---
Not personally, I have a To-Do for out i18n people to test ko and jp, but not
got a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 21:34:33 -0700
2005 ---
OOo's own hacks to the icu-2.6 were, apparently, designed to add support for the
fo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 21:24:25 -0700
2005 ---
OOo's own hacks to the icu-2.6 were, apparently, designed to add support for the
fo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 16 01:42:33 -0700
2005 ---
Which I of course successfully completed and fixed it for us this way in
ooo-buil
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 09:53:22 -0700
2005 ---
ah, I didn't read kendy properly "The patch seems to break the 'internal icu'
case
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 09:35:42 -0700
2005 ---
And - that was a clean build...
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 09:22:12 -0700
2005 ---
Isn't it completely normal to have icu_2.6 when you use intermal icu? ;)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 09:00:00 -0700
2005 ---
you got unicode headers in your external solver, and there's icu2_6 names there
so
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 08:35:47 -0700
2005 ---
The patch seems to break the 'internal icu' case for me :-(
(This is from m129 bui
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54479
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 03:26:16 -0700
2005 ---
Hi Caolan,
I'd be fine if the lunatic fringe :-) didn't need any patch, but I doub
22 matches
Mail list logo