Hello,
On 2006-09-08, at 03:16 , Németh László wrote:
Suggestion works with the following new REP replacement declarations
in affix file:
REP st rd
REP st th
REP th rd
REP th st
REP rd th
Unfortunatelly, REP suggestion hasn't worked for longer patterns
(103st, 103st etc.), yet. Thanks for
Suggestion works with the following new REP replacement declarations
in affix file:
REP st rd
REP st th
REP th rd
REP th st
REP rd th
Unfortunatelly, REP suggestion hasn't worked for longer patterns
(103st, 103st etc.), yet. Thanks for your comment.
On 8 Sep 2006 06:09:50 -, [EMAIL PRO
