[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you used the --dry-run option with both patches, then nothing got
patched at all - only tests have been performed, and you still have the
plain vanilla kernel and the 2.6.0 modules folder. You might also see
that from the Makefile in the upper kernel source directory. I
Ok, I patched the kernel with the patch-2.6.0-bk3 patch.
Now the first four lines of Makefie read:
VERSION = 2
PATCHLEVEL = 6
SUBLEVEL = 0
EXTRAVERSION = -bk3
(There is a space between = and -bk3, does this matter? Is this why I do not
have /lib/module/2.6.0-bk3?)
Then I run:
patch --dry-run -p1
Do you have to patch the kernel with the path-2.6.0-bk patch?
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 12:25 pm, Ed Wildgoose wrote:
> > Anyway, I tried to patch the kernel with the alsa patch and it did not
>
> work.
>
> > (I was getting the message that I posted in my previous email.)
> > BTW, to patch the k
> Anyway, I tried to patch the kernel with the alsa patch and it did not
work.
> (I was getting the message that I posted in my previous email.)
> BTW, to patch the kernel I usedpatch --dry-run -p1 -i patch.file
As I said, just download the latest tar ball, and unzip the alsa-kernel into
the r
> If you used the --dry-run option with both patches, then nothing got
> patched at all - only tests have been performed, and you still have the
> plain vanilla kernel and the 2.6.0 modules folder. You might also see
> that from the Makefile in the upper kernel source directory. I bet, at
> the top
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought of that and that's why I reinstall the kernel and I patched it with
the patch from kernel.org, i.e 2.6.0-bk. The problem with that was that the
kernel could not load any module. The reason , I believe, was that the kernel
was 2.6.0-bk but in the /lib/module f
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 07:35 am, you wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 08:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > ...
> > Before I applied these two patches I had patch the kernel with the patch
> > I found in http://bytesex.org/patches/2.6.0-1/patch-2.6.0-kraxel.gz (I
> > have some probems with bttv m
> Can someone please confirm how one should patch the 2.6 kernel to get the
> latest drivers. I want to try out the RME 9632 driver which doesn't seem
to
> be in current 2.6 builds.
Pah. Drat. Page one of the website:
http://www.alsa-project.org/documentation.php3#kerndriv
However, you need to
...
> and then I tried to patch the kernel by using the patch from ALSA's ftp s
>
> ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/kernel-patches/alsa-bk-2003-12-30.patch.gz
...
> 4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
...etc..
> Any idea of what I might be doing wrong?
Well, I had the same issue. I t
Hi,
I first patched the kernel by using the patch from www.kernel.org
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/patch-2.6.0-bk3.gz
and then I tried to patch the kernel by using the patch from ALSA's ftp s
ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/kernel-patches/alsa-bk-2003-12-30.patch.gz
10 matches
Mail list logo
