On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:45:52PM -0400, hymie! wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 04:14:25PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 02:24:52PM -0400, hy...@lactose.homelinux.net wrote:
> > > I'm trying to figure out a way to split my two largest DLEs (one is
> > > 100GB and the other
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 04:14:25PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 02:24:52PM -0400, hy...@lactose.homelinux.net wrote:
> > I'm trying to figure out a way to split my two largest DLEs (one is
> > 100GB and the other is about 60GB) into several smaller ones.
> >
> Do you mean yo
I'm not sure it's doing anything.
[amandabackup@archivist NMHPVPR]$ amstatus NMHPVPR
Using: /var/lib/amanda/NMHPVPR/state/log/amdump
>From Mon Apr 10 15:21:05 MDT 2017
fileserver2:/Hope_IT 20170408010017 1 1252k flushing (0k done
(0.00%)) (15:21:10)
fileserver2:/Hope_Secure 2017040
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 21:56:40 +, Ochressandro Rettinger wrote:
> Is there a way to check to see how far along amflush is?
the "amstatus" command.
Nathan
Nathan Stra
:53 PM
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: Re: amflush
* Debra S Baddorf [20170410 16:46]:
>
> > On Apr 10, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Debra S Baddorf wrote:
> >
> > Were there any other tapes “available” for it to use?The one you just
> > re-labeled
> > will hav
* Debra S Baddorf [20170410 16:46]:
>
> > On Apr 10, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Debra S Baddorf wrote:
> >
> > Were there any other tapes “available” for it to use?The one you just
> > re-labeled
> > will have dropped to the last of the list.If it’s the only
> On Apr 10, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Debra S Baddorf wrote:
>
> Were there any other tapes “available” for it to use?The one you just
> re-labeled
> will have dropped to the last of the list.If it’s the only one, it’ll
> still be the one used. If there are other free tapes that you labe
Were there any other tapes “available” for it to use?The one you just
re-labeled
will have dropped to the last of the list.If it’s the only one, it’ll
still be the one used. If there are other free tapes that you labelled before
this one,
they’ll be used first.
You *CAN* edit the
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 08:17:16PM +, Ochressandro Rettinger wrote:
> Yes. It was less effective than I might have hoped. :-/
>
> [amandabackup@archivist ~]$ amlabel NMHPVPR NMHPVPR0001
> Reading label...
> Found label 'NMHPVPR0001' but it is not in the tapelist file.
> Not writing lab
I did that, and it worked, but then when I ran amflush again, it didn't
list the tape name.
[amandabackup@archivist ~]$ amflush NMHPVPR
Flushing dumps from 20170408010017 using storage "NMHPVPR", tape changer
"tape_drive".
Are you sure you want to do this [yN]? Y
Running in background,
Try “amlabel -f ….. “ for “force”.
Be sure it’s the right tape, but I use it all the time.
Deb
> On Apr 10, 2017, at 3:17 PM, Ochressandro Rettinger
> wrote:
>
> Yes. It was less effective than I might have hoped. :-/
>
> [amandabackup@archivist ~]$ amlabel NMHPVPR NMHPVP
Yes. It was less effective than I might have hoped. :-/
[amandabackup@archivist ~]$ amlabel NMHPVPR NMHPVPR0001
Reading label...
Found label 'NMHPVPR0001' but it is not in the tapelist file.
Not writing label.
Not writing label.
Do I need to erase the label somehow first?
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 02:24:52PM -0400, hy...@lactose.homelinux.net wrote:
> Jon LaBadie writes:
> >On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 09:05:32AM -0400, hy...@lactose.homelinux.net wrote:
> >> Greetings.
> >>
> >> I seem to be getting an awful lot of full (level-0) backups:
> >>
> >Not unusual. It a prod
Did you do another “amlabel” after doing “amrmtape”?
Deb Baddorf
> On Apr 10, 2017, at 2:16 PM, Ochressandro Rettinger
> wrote:
>
>
> I’m having problems with amflush and the tapelist.
>
> My backups didn’t work last night, so I swapped the tape and
> ra
I'm having problems with amflush and the tapelist.
My backups didn't work last night, so I swapped the tape and
ran amflush. Amflush hung, so I tried to stop it and run it again, without
changing the tape. In order to do that, I ran amrmtape on the tape, and
r
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 13:57:34 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 09:05:32AM -0400, hy...@lactose.homelinux.net wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > I seem to be getting an awful lot of full (level-0) backups:
[...]
> Not unusual. It a product of having a couple of large DLEs and sev
Jon LaBadie writes:
>On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 09:05:32AM -0400, hy...@lactose.homelinux.net wrote:
>> Greetings.
>>
>> I seem to be getting an awful lot of full (level-0) backups:
>>
>Not unusual. It a product of having a couple of large DLEs and several,
>relatively small DLEs. Amanda tries to
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 09:05:32AM -0400, hy...@lactose.homelinux.net wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I seem to be getting an awful lot of full (level-0) backups:
>
> -rw--- 1 amanda backup 805,089,376 Apr 1 23:04
> slot140/00020.alfred._var.0
> -rw--- 1 amanda backup 805,100,793 Apr 2 23:04
Greetings.
I seem to be getting an awful lot of full (level-0) backups:
-rw--- 1 amanda backup 805,089,376 Apr 1 23:04 slot140/00020.alfred._var.0
-rw--- 1 amanda backup 805,100,793 Apr 2 23:04 slot141/00021.alfred._var.0
-rw--- 1 amanda backup 805,116,298 Apr 3 23:04 slot142/00021
Nathan Stratton Treadway writes:
>On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 07:06:55 -0400, hy...@lactose.homelinux.net wrote:
>>
>> Let's say I have a very recent full (level 0) backup of /home. If I
>> split up my /home into two or three DLEs, will Amanda recognize that it
>> already has a level-0 backup, and th
Bummer.
Thanks.
--hymie!
Jean-Louis Martineau writes:
>
>man amadmin:
>estimate [ hostname [ disks ]* ]*
>Print the server estimate for the dles ...
>
>The answer is NO, since 'amadmin estimate' only print the server=20
>estimate (based on history).
>The best tool is du.
>
>J
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 07:06:55 -0400, hy...@lactose.homelinux.net wrote:
> Separate but related question.
>
> Let's say I have a very recent full (level 0) backup of /home. If I
> split up my /home into two or three DLEs, will Amanda recognize that it
> already has a level-0 backup, and then ta
man amadmin:
estimate [ hostname [ disks ]* ]*
Print the server estimate for the dles ...
The answer is NO, since 'amadmin estimate' only print the server
estimate (based on history).
The best tool is du.
Jean-Louis
On 10/04/17 07:06 AM, hy...@lactose.homelinux.net wrote:
>
Greetings.
I'm experimenting with how I can split up a couple of very large
backups into multiple smaller backups.
newlaptop.local.net /home/nothymie /home {
simple-gnutar-remote
exclude "./hymie"
estimate client
}
newlaptop.local.net /home/hymie /home {
simple-gnutar-remote
includ
24 matches
Mail list logo
