* Gary V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Waaay to much coffee, I may have had an unpatched version 2.72 on my
> system I was testing with.
>
> Before you do anything, first check for the vulnerability:
>
> wget http://www200.pair.com/mecham/email.txt
>
> razor-check -d email.txt
>
> it should "razor-ch
* Daniel J McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Check /var/log/mail/info (or equivalent on your platform) for the
> startup messages showing Razor is loaded:
>
> Aug 8 07:13:42 sa amavis[2858]: Module Razor2::Client::Version 2.75
Aug 8 20:01:26 mail amavis[13215]: Module Razor2::Client::Version 2.7
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 20:06 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I activated razor2 accoriding to the docs I found on
> > http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/spamfilter20050628.html
> > But how do I make sure it's actually being used (e.g. LOGS?)
>
> Call me
Gary wrote:
> Gary wrote:
>> Matt wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> Is there a setting to set where you can say "Discard spam for this user
>>> if the level is 20 or above"? Is this spam_kill_level? If so it didn't
>>> seem to want to work (and to be descriptive, it was basically ignoring
>>> the set
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I activated razor2 accoriding to the docs I found on
> http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/spamfilter20050628.html
> But how do I make sure it's actually being used (e.g. LOGS?)
Call me a retard:
su amavis -c 'spamassassin --lint -D'
shows it...
--
Ralf H
I activated razor2 accoriding to the docs I found on
http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/spamfilter20050628.html
But how do I make sure it's actually being used (e.g. LOGS?)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +
Gary wrote:
> Matt wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Is there a setting to set where you can say "Discard spam for this user
>> if the level is 20 or above"? Is this spam_kill_level? If so it didn't
>> seem to want to work (and to be descriptive, it was basically ignoring
>> the setting).
>> Do you hav
Michael wrote:
> how do you disable auto-expire?
bayes_auto_expire 0
in local.cf
But you must set up a cron job to run
'sa-learn --sync --force-expire' one each day (or so), and this cron job needs
to run as your amavis user, otherwise if 'root' writes to one of the
Bayes files, it will no long
how do you disable auto-expire?
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Te
corrections:
> I know you have said you are 100% LDAP.
> Looking at the amavisd executable, and README.ldap,
LDAP.schema
> spam_quarantine_cutoff_level is not to be found,
(as it relates to
Matt wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is there a setting to set where you can say "Discard spam for this user
> if the level is 20 or above"? Is this spam_kill_level? If so it didn't
> seem to want to work (and to be descriptive, it was basically ignoring
> the setting).
> Do you have to have a quarantin
>
> Whats the difference between sa_kill_level and
> sa_quarantine_cutoff_level?
Just for the record, there is no "sa_kill_level"; the two levels you'll care
about are:
$sa_kill_level_deflt
As mentioned, this triggers evasive action. Where the message actual goes
depends upon the set
MJ wrote:
>
> #grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] temp_file
> Please comment.
> -2.2 (-42154.7/19583) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=212.107
MEAN TOTAL COUNT
MEAN = TOTAL/COUNT
I can't explain how these number are generated without carefully reading:
http://wiki.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean, something like:
$sa_quarantine_cutoff_level = 20; # spam level beyond which quarantine is
off
Yeah, this one :)
You don't have to quarantine, you could just discard the messages over 20.
But what will you do with messages between $sa_kill_level_deflt
> Is there a setting to set where you can say "Discard spam for
> this user if the level is 20 or above"? Is this
> spam_kill_level? If so it didn't seem to want to work (and
> to be descriptive, it was basically ignoring the setting).
You mean, something like:
$sa_quarantine_cutoff_level
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 03:57:53PM -0400, Gregory Pleau wrote:
> It worked perfectly under Fedora Core 3 with Perl 5.8.5.
> Current environment is Fedora Core 4 with Perl 5.8.6 and Net::Server 0.88.
I think that last is your culprit.
I had weird problems with Net::Server 0.88 under FreeBSD.
Hi all,
Is there a setting to set where you can say "Discard spam for this user
if the level is 20 or above"? Is this spam_kill_level? If so it didn't
seem to want to work (and to be descriptive, it was basically ignoring
the setting).
Do you have to have a quarantine or something setup as
Daniel,
> i´ve got amavisd-new 2.3.2 running under postfix 2.2.3 and i´ve got a
> problem with SA timing out once or twice a day at app. 5000 mails per day.
>
> Is there a way to debug SA without running amavisd with "amavisd debug" in
> non daemon mode ?
I don't think there is. At 5000 mails per
#grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] temp_file
-2.2 (-42154.7/19583) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=212.107
Please comment.
Thanks
MJ
-Original Message-
From: Gary V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 5:35 PM
To: MJ
Cc:
Greg,
> I seem to have stumbled into an issue where amavisd won't actually setup
> the child servers on one
> of my mailservers here.
> amavisd-new-2.3.1-1.2.fc4.rf - from the Dries RPM package.
> Aug 3 15:38:27 hera.internal.vipond.ca /usr/sbin/amavisd[11518]:
> Net::Server: Beginning prefork (
MJ wrote:
> Hi,
> I am unable to understand why this user is getting negative score, he is
> sending relaying huge number of messages but amavis is not stoping and
> insteady assigning a negative score. Any help would be appreciated.
Additionally, regardless of the fact that you may not want what
Hi list,
i´ve got amavisd-new 2.3.2 running under postfix 2.2.3 and i´ve got a problem
with SA timing out once or twice a day at app. 5000 mails per day.
Is there a way to debug SA without running amavisd with "amavisd debug" in non
daemon mode ?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Dani
MJ wrote:
> I agree that changing log level will give me more details but I want to
> investigate this particular case, so where to look for negative scores,
> I didn't put under any negative score list.
> Thanks,
> MJ
This assumes you do not use SQL for your whitelist.
I don't know if the prob
Erwin,
> how can I replicate these spamassasin directives in amavisd.conf
This is currently (mostly) not configurable in amavisd-new,
so you need to change the source to achieve modifications.
> add_header all Flag _YESNOCAPS_
The X-Spam-Flag YES/NO is inserted when spam score is above tag2 lev
Gary,
> >> X-Spam-Report is normally not provided by default because is it quite
> >> chatty. You have to request this one explicitly:
> >> $sa_spam_report_header=1;
> >
> > i tried that still no x-spam-report i wonder if postfix need to reload?
> I could not get that to work on my system either
Steve,
> I've got a couple of sites where there are several domain names - and
> quite a bit of spam gets through to users of the 'other' domains - yet
> performance is fine for the master domain.
> They're setup with all the main entries pointing to the 'master' domain
> (e.g. acme.co.nz), and th
MJ,
> I am unable to understand why this user is getting negative score, he is
> sending relaying huge number of messages but amavis is not stoping and
> insteady assigning a negative score. Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Aug 8 00:42:51 mailgate2 postfix/smtpd[1762]: [ID 197553 mail.info]
> 5
>>> "MJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/08/05 9:55 AM >>>
>I agree that changing log level will give me more details but I want to
>investigate this particular case, so where to look for negative scores,
>I didn't put under any negative score list.
>
>Thanks,
>MJ
It might be the automatic white list (AWL)
add_header all Flag _YESNOCAPS_add_header spam Level _STARS(*)_fold_headers 1add_header all Score _HITS_add_header all Bayes _Bayes_add_header all DCC _DCCB_: _DCCR_add_header all Summary Score _HITS_ (Spam threshold is _REQD_); Tests: _TESTSSCORES(, )_
score ALL_TRUSTED 0
Hi Again,
I tried to help myself. Please have a look at the patch attached.
It seems to work and I hope there are no side effects concerning stability,
performance or security.
Matthias
--On Freitag, 5. August 2005 15:52 +0200 Matthias Bandemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
with amavis
Hello,
I seem to have stumbled into an issue where amavisd won't actually setup
the child servers on one
of my mailservers here.
* version of amavis
amavisd-new-2.3.1-1.2.fc4.rf - from the Dries RPM package.
---
* version of MTA
postfix 2.2.3 (also postfix 2.2.
I agree that changing log level will give me more details but I want to
investigate this particular case, so where to look for negative scores,
I didn't put under any negative score list.
Thanks,
MJ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen
C
>>> "MJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/08/05 7:38 AM >>>
>Hi,
>I am unable to understand why this user is getting negative score, he is
>sending relaying huge number of messages but amavis is not stoping and
>insteady assigning a negative score. Any help would be appreciated.
>
>MJ
In /etc/amavisd.conf,
33 matches
Mail list logo
