Re: [AMaViS-user] Postfix+Amavisd+Spamassassin+Clamav low performance on 14-host deployment

2005-09-05 Thread Tony Earnshaw
man, 05.09.2005 kl. 18.03 skrev Gary V: [...] > Matt found that proper indexing helped LDAP queries: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amavis-user&m=112377681617056&w=2 Indexing (or not) of OpenLDAP attributes will *not* help the number of connections to the slapd server. It *will* help the spee

Re: [AMaViS-user] Russian SPAM

2005-09-05 Thread Tony Earnshaw
man, 05.09.2005 kl. 19.46 skrev Mike Cisar: > Anybody have any good SpamAssassin rules for blocking 'Russian' SPAM. We've > been getting absolutely bombarded with the stuff over the past few days. > > Hrm, at least I think it's SPAM, maybe I've won the lottery and just don't > understand :-)

[AMaViS-user] Russian SPAM

2005-09-05 Thread Mike Cisar
Hi All, Anybody have any good SpamAssassin rules for blocking 'Russian' SPAM. We've been getting absolutely bombarded with the stuff over the past few days. Hrm, at least I think it's SPAM, maybe I've won the lottery and just don't understand :-) Cheers, > Mike < --

Re: [AMaViS-user] Postfix+Amavisd+Spamassassin+Clamav low performance on 14-host deployment

2005-09-05 Thread Gary V
Gianluca wrote: > On 9/5/05, Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This is documented. Postfix needs to query the LDAP servers to know if >> the domain is local, virtual, relay or none of these. For every >> recipient! Thus it makes sense to keep virtual_alias_domains, >> relay_domains a

Re: [AMaViS-user] Quarantine and MTA feedback

2005-09-05 Thread Gary V
Hans wrote: >>> >>This should be working, it should quarantine spam that scores at 15.0 or >>above. What version of amavisd-new are you using? >> > The thought hadn't occurded to me... amavisd-new-2.0-4 as supplied (and > updated) in SUSE 9.2. I guess I should upgrade it first? :-) >> Are you po

Re: [AMaViS-user] Postfix+Amavisd+Spamassassin+Clamav low performance on 14-host deployment

2005-09-05 Thread lst_hoe01
Zitat von Gianluca Marcari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: We are running a few load and stress tests but we'll probably have to bring 16 more servers in the pool, since our peak load can be 24000 mails per minute. We will keep tweaking the Amavis configuration because even with 30 servers this will amou

Re: [AMaViS-user] Postfix+Amavisd+Spamassassin+Clamav low performance on 14-host deployment

2005-09-05 Thread Tony Earnshaw
man, 05.09.2005 kl. 13.07 skrev Gianluca Marcari: > > This is documented. Postfix needs to query the LDAP servers to know if > > the domain is local, virtual, relay or none of these. For every > > recipient! Thus it makes sense to keep virtual_alias_domains, > > relay_domains and mydestination in

[AMaViS-user] check_mail documentation and questions

2005-09-05 Thread Martin Orr
I have written some documentation of the check_mail function in amavisd-new from the point of view of an MTA input module, which can be found at http://www.martinorr.name/amavisd-new If anyone finds any mistakes in it, please tell me. I also observe that all the input packages contain some duplica

Re: [AMaViS-user] Postfix+Amavisd+Spamassassin+Clamav low performance on 14-host deployment

2005-09-05 Thread Mark Martinec
Gianluca, >> We traced the unusually high response times in the fwd-rcpt-to phase >> to a side effect of our deployment: we were swamping the LDAP >> directory with hundreds of queries per second, and the back-end SMTP >> (which btw is not Postfix but a commercial one, my bad for forgetting >> to

Re: [AMaViS-user] Postfix+Amavisd+Spamassassin+Clamav low performance on 14-host deployment

2005-09-05 Thread Gianluca Marcari
On 9/5/05, Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is documented. Postfix needs to query the LDAP servers to know if > the domain is local, virtual, relay or none of these. For every > recipient! Thus it makes sense to keep virtual_alias_domains, > relay_domains and mydestination in a f

Re: [AMaViS-user] Postfix+Amavisd+Spamassassin+Clamav low performance on 14-host deployment

2005-09-05 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Gianluca Marcari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > As a brutal workaround we exported the list of spamlovers into a text > file and stopped querying the LDAP directories. Another team is > setting up a couple of additional LDAP slaves for our queries. Also, I > noticed we run LDAP queries for *every* recip

Re: [AMaViS-user] Postfix+Amavisd+Spamassassin+Clamav low performance on 14-host deployment

2005-09-05 Thread Gianluca Marcari
Sorry, I didn't send this to the list; resending First of all, thanks everybody for overwhelming me with helpful pointers! A quick update: We traced the unusually high response times in the fwd-rcpt-to phase to a side effect of our deployment: we were swamping the LDAP directory with hundreds of