> It the message in the quarantine?
> Just feed it (zcat) to su vscan -c 'spamassassin -r'
Oops, that would be to report spam.
To do the opposite: zcat ... | su vscan -c 'sa-learn --ham'
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architectur
Dave,
> I am running amavisd-new-2.3.2 with SA 3.04, protecting an MSEXCHANGE
> server.
>
> I am now getting some false positives whenever email from a certain
> address is sent to an EXCHANGE account, it is blocked with the
> following:
> BAYES_99=3.5,
> HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
> MISSING_SUBJECT=1.22
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Mike Cisar wrote:
> > Has Dag stopped producing rpm's for Amavisd-new?
> > I noticed that the last in his repo are 2.3.2 and are for RH
> > up to FC3.
>
> >From what I understand (2nd or 3rdhand now) apparently DAG is concentrating
> on FC3 and previous versions, but FC4 ver
Rob MacGregor wrote:
IMO blocking messages that get a spam hit of as low as that (6.45) is
asking for trouble - but it's your system. Why not quarantine instead
of blocking, then you'll have a copy for running sa-learn on?
I agree. Also, I prefer simply to tag messages with ***SPAM*** in the
On 27/09/05, Dave Augustus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello9 all,
>
> I am running amavisd-new-2.3.2 with SA 3.04, protecting an MSEXCHANGE
> server.
>
> I am now getting some false positives whenever email from a certain
> address is sent to an EXCHANGE account, it is blocked with the
> followin
Hello9 all,
I am running amavisd-new-2.3.2 with SA 3.04, protecting an MSEXCHANGE
server.
I am now getting some false positives whenever email from a certain
address is sent to an EXCHANGE account, it is blocked with the
following:
BAYES_99=3.5,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
MISSING_SUBJECT=1.226,
MSGI
Clifton,
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:44:41PM -0400, Elijah Savage wrote:
> > I read the UPDATING file and I ran the perl-after-update which I thought
> > would take care of this problem but it seemed to do nothing for me. I
> > did not run a portupgrade on the port I cvs'd the new ports tree then
Jesper,
> I have just installed a new FreeBSD box, updated the ports system,
> installed postfix, amavisd-new and clamav. So far so good.
> I have made the nessassary changes to the conf files with no problems.
> Now I started postfix, and then I would start amavisd-new, but here I
> have problems
John,
> I have a problem running amavisd-new2.3.3 on SuSE 9.0, to be more pricise,
> the dependency Net::server-0.88 fails on SuSE9.0 .
> In SuSE 9.1 /9.2 there are no problems and amavisd-new2.3.3 and
> perl::net::server0.88 are runnig happely.
>
> Net::server-0.88 compiles and installs without a
Rik Gommers wrote the following on 27/09/2005 12:23:
> Hi Alan,
>
> You don't need the previous sources...in the first few lines of the spec
> file you find the version nr. it should correspond to the version nr of
> amavis, because the script uses it to refer to the rest of the sources...
>
> see
Jesper wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I have just installed a new FreeBSD box, updated the ports system,
> installed postfix, amavisd-new and clamav. So far so good.
> I have made the nessassary changes to the conf files with no problems.
> Now I started postfix, and then I would start amavisd-new, but here
John wrote:
> Hello list,
> I have a problem running amavisd-new2.3.3 on SuSE 9.0, to be more pricise,
> the dependency Net::server-0.88 fails on SuSE9.0 .
> In SuSE 9.1 /9.2 there are no problems and amavisd-new2.3.3 and
> perl::net::server0.88 are runnig happely.
> Net::server-0.88 compiles
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:58:01PM +0200, Tony Earnshaw enlightened us:
> Rik Gommers het geskryf:
>
> >You can build the RPM's from source yourself using rpmbuild. just make sure
> >you check the spec file in the .tar if it refers to the right version. I
> >build it for SuSE 10.0 Beta without any
Rik Gommers het geskryf:
You can build the RPM's from source yourself using rpmbuild. just make sure
you check the spec file in the .tar if it refers to the right version. I
build it for SuSE 10.0 Beta without any problems just after the release of
amavis. You could also try to rebuild the SuSE
Hi guys,
I have just installed a new FreeBSD box, updated the ports system,
installed postfix, amavisd-new and clamav. So far so good.
I have made the nessassary changes to the conf files with no problems.
Now I started postfix, and then I would start amavisd-new, but here I
have problems.
The p
I guess you could, by changing/setting
#$inet_socket_port = 10024;
to port 25 in the amavis.conf
and the forward target
#$forward_method = 'smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025'; # where to forward checked mail
to whereever your target SMTP server runs
BUT BE WARNED
I WOULD NOT EXPECT AMAVIS TO BE AS ROB
Hello list,
I have a problem running amavisd-new2.3.3 on SuSE 9.0, to be more pricise,
the dependency Net::server-0.88 fails on SuSE9.0 .
In SuSE 9.1 /9.2 there are no problems and amavisd-new2.3.3 and
perl::net::server0.88 are runnig happely.
Net::server-0.88 compiles and installs without any
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:44:41PM -0400, Elijah Savage wrote:
> I read the UPDATING file and I ran the perl-after-update which I thought
> would take care of this problem but it seemed to do nothing for me. I
> did not run a portupgrade on the port I cvs'd the new ports tree then I
> just did a
Hi,
I want to add some positive score (black list) to all the incoming
messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to achieve this objective, I tried to add
the following line in /etc/amavisd.conf
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' => 3.0,
But it give gives the following error
Sep 17 10:26:42 mailgate1 postfix/s
Hi,
unless someone has already provided a patch, amavislogsumm
(http://mbegan.phpwebhosting.com/pfix/amavislogsumm) does not process
properly 2.3.3 log format.
I wrote a very simple patch so that test names are read without
leading/trailing square brackets.
While I was at it, I also added t
If using dual-sendmail, you could simply use mailertables and depending
on rules, directly forward out instead of passing it to amavis...
My .02...
Gary V wrote:
>Rocco wrote:
>
>
>
>>Thanks,
>>What I have to do so mail isn't routed through amavisd?
>>rocsca
>>
>>
>
>I'm not familiar with
Hi, I've been installing systems per the Vintinner wiki for some time
now without any issues until now.
I've configured the sysem per all instructions I can find to deal with
this issue.
There have been a few sparse threads on the subject;
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amavis-user&m=11203500572
Hi all,
I found the same bug that Jerome Schell reported some days ago.
Looking at the sources in 2.3.3, in line 5293:
if (!exists($banned_rules{$n})) {
do_log(2,"INFO: unknown banned table name $n,
recip=$recip");
} elsif (!defined($banned_rules{$n}))
Hi Alan,
You don't need the previous sources...in the first few lines of the spec
file you find the version nr. it should correspond to the version nr of
amavis, because the script uses it to refer to the rest of the sources...
see sample lines below of my amavisd-new.spec with the correct versio
You can build the RPM's from source yourself using rpmbuild. just make sure
you check the spec file in the .tar if it refers to the right version. I
build it for SuSE 10.0 Beta without any problems just after the release of
amavis. You could also try to rebuild the SuSE package off course, its
avai
25 matches
Mail list logo
