Re: [AMaViS-user] submitting MS Exchange email to Bayes

2005-11-07 Thread Mathias Tauber
Set up a shared imap (public) folder on exchange server. Users drag spam into that folder. Look for "sa-learn" for the perl scripts to read it and submit it as spam. We've tried that but fetched the mails with POP3 instead of IMAP. The result wasn't very satisfying. Does it matter if using IMAP

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd-new 2.3.3 and multi.surbl.org

2005-11-07 Thread Mark Martinec
Paolo, > been running 2.3.3 for a while here, with DNS tests enabled. > Since the release of the system in production is getting closer, I've > started checking processing times and system load. > > While the system runs unloaded (no swapping) with 10 concurrent > amavisd-new process (ClamAV+SA wi

Re: [AMaViS-user] banned_filename_re rules

2005-11-07 Thread Mark Martinec
Nicklas, > I'd like to allow certain file extensions sent in a known .zip file. > e.g. Base rules tells amavisd to block .exe files. Exceptions to this > rule should apply if a .zip file named "safe.zip" is found. Order a list like this: block whatever is disallowed unconditionally, [ qr'^sa

Re: [AMaViS-user] [patch] replace banned attachments

2005-11-07 Thread Thomas Jarosch
Aury, [mail from offlist] On Monday 07 November 2005 22:08, you wrote: > Great job, Thomas ! > > I recently asked for it to Mark ... one suggestion... Can it be > integrated with LDAP/SQL? The warnbannedrecip can be used for it. The banned filename lookup code is unchanged, so it should already w

Re: [AMaViS-user] [patch] replace banned attachments

2005-11-07 Thread Xavier Beaudouin
Hi Thomas, I love this patch. I hope it will be included in next version :p /Xavier Thomas Jarosch wrote: Hello, here is a patch to replace banned attachments with a text notice. Guess a lot of people are going to be happy :-) Features: * Replace banned attachments with notice of your choice

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd-new 2.3.3 and multi.surbl.org

2005-11-07 Thread Gary V
Paolo wrote: > Hi, > been running 2.3.3 for a while here, with DNS tests enabled. > Since the release of the system in production is getting closer, I've > started checking processing times and system load. > While the system runs unloaded (no swapping) with 10 concurrent > amavisd-new process

Re: [AMaViS-user] ZDI-05-002: Clam Antivirus Remote Code Execution

2005-11-07 Thread David Filion
Michael Scheidell wrote: In case anyone who used clam av missed this: ZDI-05-002: Clam Antivirus Remote Code Execution Vulnerability http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-05-002.html November 4th, 2005 -- CVE ID: CAN-2005-3303 -- Affected Vendor: Clam AntiVirus -- Affected Produ

[AMaViS-user] [patch] replace banned attachments

2005-11-07 Thread Thomas Jarosch
Hello, here is a patch to replace banned attachments with a text notice. Guess a lot of people are going to be happy :-) Features: * Replace banned attachments with notice of your choice * Bans root/source attachment for compressed archives * Original message gets quarantined for later reinjectio

[AMaViS-user] amavisd-new 2.3.3 and multi.surbl.org

2005-11-07 Thread Paolo Cravero as2594
Hi, been running 2.3.3 for a while here, with DNS tests enabled. Since the release of the system in production is getting closer, I've started checking processing times and system load. While the system runs unloaded (no swapping) with 10 concurrent amavisd-new process (ClamAV+SA with DNS test