> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Mathias Tauber
> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 1:57 AM
> To: Amavis users
> Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] submitting MS Exchange email to Bayes
>
> > Set up a shared imap (public) folder on exchange
Shelley Waltz a écrit :
I am running postfix-2.0.18-1/amavisd-new-20030616/spamassassin-2.63-1.
I am also running squirrelmail-1.4.3. These all run on the same host.
I wish to exclude mail sent from squirrelmail to either local recipients
or non-local recipients from spam filtering.
confi
Rocco wrote:
> Hello,
> with amavisd-new it is quite simple to avoid that all messages for one
> domain are not scanned for spam. But I'ld like that every message for one
> domain is scanned and that if one message is considered SPAM then it must be
> forwarded to a special mailbox.
> Someone ca
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:40:43PM +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> with amavisd-new it is quite simple to avoid that all messages for one
> domain are not scanned for spam. But I'ld like that every message for one
> domain is scanned and that if one message is considered SPAM then it m
Ah, I guess I was just lucky as it seemed to work before. I'll go ahead and do
some tweaking to the statement, thanks for the advice.
Ryan Moore
--
Perigee.net Corporation
704-849-8355 (sales)
704-849-8017 (tech)
www.perigee.net
- Original Message -
From: Mark Martinec <[EMAIL
Nicolas,
> Nov 7 09:36:39 smtp amavis[30196]: (30196-06) TROUBLE in process_request:
> Error writing a SMTP response to the socket: Relais bris\303\251 (pipe) at
> (eval 35) line 686, line 191.
This is probably just a consequence of Postfix giving up on amavisd
when amavisd fails to respond in
Andy,
> So this guy is trying to send email to us and it's getting caught. He
> sent from 2 different addresses/domains. I found on the same day another
> user from the second domain who was able to get through. I realize that
> some of this is related to sa but the first one got caught by amavi
Ryan,
> Since upgrading to amavisd 2.3.3 amavis wasn't returning the correct result
> for our user whitelist/blacklist entries in SQL. If a user had [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
> whitelisted and @aol.com blacklisted, the blacklist entry was matching and
> causing the message to be blocked/tagged.
>
> We
I am running postfix-2.0.18-1/amavisd-new-20030616/spamassassin-2.63-1.
I am also running squirrelmail-1.4.3. These all run on the same host.
I wish to exclude mail sent from squirrelmail to either local recipients
or non-local recipients from spam filtering.
The squirrelmail header looks like
Nicolas wrote:
> Here the grep Error /var/log/maillog output (first CPU overload occurs
> on Nov 7 beetween 10:00 and 11:00) :
I don't think there was anything there that might help. It should be
simple to tell when the crash occurred because you would have had to
restart amavisd-new. You should
Hello,
with amavisd-new it is quite simple to avoid that all messages for one
domain are not scanned for spam. But I'ld like that every message for one
domain is scanned and that if one message is considered SPAM then it must be
forwarded to a special mailbox.
Someone can give me an hint?
thanks
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:57:13AM +0100, Mathias Tauber wrote:
> >Set up a shared imap (public) folder on exchange server.
> >Users drag spam into that folder.
> >
> >Look for "sa-learn" for the perl scripts to read it and submit it as
> >spam.
>
> We've tried that but fetched the mails with POP3
First, many thanks for your help !
> It *could* be one particular malformed or malicious message that
> is the source of the problem. Start with:
> grep Error /var/log/maillog
> to see if you can find what message it might be, or at least what (if
> any) problem there might be listed in your mail
13 matches
Mail list logo
