That was it - thanks Clifton!
I now have:
- mail scoring 3-8 (via tag2) going to a often-checked email
address/folder
- mail scoring 8+ (kill_level) quarantined on my gateway in a "spam"
email account
All very nice - with the small exception that I don't get a log of the
tag2 items to $spam_ad
At 06:18 PM 11/30/2005, Keith Dunnett wrote:
Peter wrote:
Well if the SA rules are updated doesn't amavisd-new
need to be restarted?
To the best of my knowledge, no. Certainly I got away
without doing so for a couple of years.
amavisd-new loads spamassassin rules once on
startup. If the
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 02:26:10PM +1300, Steve Brorens wrote:
> Thanks for that Mark, but I'm having some difficulty in getting it to
> work.
>
> I have:
>
> ---/etc/postfix/virtual
>
> /^(.*)\+spam@([.*])\.commarc\.co\nz$/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL P
Thanks for that Mark, but I'm having some difficulty in getting it to
work.
I have:
---/etc/postfix/virtual
/^(.*)\+spam@([.*])\.commarc\.co\nz$/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---eof---
...and email to the second two gets redirec
Thanks for that Mark, but I'm having some difficulty in getting it to
work.
I have:
---/etc/postfix/virtual
/^(.*)\+spam@([.*])\.commarc\.co\nz$/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---eof---
...and email to the second two gets redirecte
--- Keith Dunnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter wrote:
>
> >Well if the SA rules are updated doesn't amavisd-new need to be
> restarted?
> >
> >
> To the best of my knowledge, no. Certainly I got away without doing so
> for a couple of years.
> When using spamd, *that* certainly does nee
Peter wrote:
Well if the SA rules are updated doesn't amavisd-new need to be restarted?
To the best of my knowledge, no. Certainly I got away without doing so
for a couple of years.
When using spamd, *that* certainly does need to be restarted, but as I
understand it amavisd invokes
spamassa
At 05:11 PM 11/30/2005, Peter wrote:
BTW, is there anything I should know about running
RDJ with amavisd-new?
In addition to what the other guys have said, add to
your rulesdujour/config file:
SA_RESTART="/usr/local/sbin/amavisd reload"
(Edit the path as appropriate) so that amavisd-new
w
Peter wrote:
BTW, is there anything I should know about running RDJ with amavisd-new?
Correction / addition to previous reply (again, not specific to
amavisd-new):
Be aware that the SARE rulesets will generate a substantial amount of
hits. If you use spamassassin for
a large userbase, you
--- Keith Dunnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter wrote:
>
> >I am trying to set up the rulesdujour script and I see it likes to have
> >access to an init script.
> >
> Does it? What for? Been using it for 2 or 3 years without one, cron
> works just fine. The script only
> needs to run onc
Peter wrote:
I am trying to set up the rulesdujour script and I see it likes to have
access to an init script.
Does it? What for? Been using it for 2 or 3 years without one, cron
works just fine. The script only
needs to run once per day, which it does quite nicely from cron.
I suppose I
Mark Martinec wrote:
> You may consider taking the opportunity and moving your Bayes db to SQL,
> as SA 3.1 brings some performance and reliability improvements
> when choosing: bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::MySQL
>
> While at it, you can upgrade amavisd-new to 2.3.3.
>
N
I am trying to set up the rulesdujour script and I see it likes to have
access to an init script. I suppose I can cook up something on my own but
is there anything out there already that works with OpenBSD? I know there
is a script in the source but it looks like it is designed for Linux only.
B
I am running amavisd-new 2.1.2 as the content filter to filter spam
with SpamAssassin 3.0 on my Postfix mail relay (Postfix 2.1.3 on Red
Hat ES 3.0).
Amavis is chrooted - /var/amavis
Recently, up2date was run on the box. The admin running up2date was
unfamiliar with our setup and updated all avai
Hi,
we had the same issue today and resolved it exactly as Matteo.
Matthias
matteo brancaleoni wrote:
> Hi,
> I think I've found out the bug
>
> On 11/30/05, matteo brancaleoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>with latest amavisd-new (amavisd-new-2.3.3) seems that if the ldap
>>connection to th
Kim,
> Guessing this is something similar to the unzip-problem that someone
> mailed about earlier this week. Yesterday my logs showed lots of lines
> with errors about bzip. I'm not sure if it's something to worry about or
> how I shall fix it. Any advice on this matter would be good.
> (09238-0
Hi,
Guessing this is something similar to the unzip-problem that someone
mailed about earlier this week. Yesterday my logs showed lots of lines
with errors about bzip. I'm not sure if it's something to worry about or
how I shall fix it. Any advice on this matter would be good.
//kim
Nov 30 10:44
Hi,
I think I've found out the bug
On 11/30/05, matteo brancaleoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> with latest amavisd-new (amavisd-new-2.3.3) seems that if the ldap
> connection to the server drops (ie after being idle for sometime)
> amavisd is not able to reconnect, or to explain it better, it
> r
(already posted on groups, but perhaps this's the right place)
Hi,
with latest amavisd-new (amavisd-new-2.3.3) seems that if the ldap
connection to the server drops (ie after being idle for sometime)
amavisd is not able to reconnect, or to explain it better, it
reconnects for for some reasons the
Hi Mark,
I did the upgrade and all went OK. In the syslog now I can see the
version is "3.001000". Will this new version block more SPAM than the
previous version? My understanding is that each new version of SA has a
new set of rules to encounter the current Spammers and their techniques,
right?
20 matches
Mail list logo
