[AMaViS-user] updated: PSCM - RPM package (clamav, postfix, spamassassin, mailscanner or amavisd-new)

Hi all, I have updated PSCM. The latest RPM package contains: * Clamav: 0.88.2 * MailScanner: 4.53.6-1 * SpamAssassin: 3.1.1 * Postfix: 2.2.10 * Amavisd-new-2.4.0 http://m-net.arbornet.org/~pscm/index.html // PSCM int

RE: [AMaViS-user] Dual Core vs Dual Xeons?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Hans du Plooy > Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:42 PM > To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Dual Core vs Dual Xeons? > > > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 21:38 -0400, Michael Sc

[AMaViS-user] Re: multiple levels of spam

Many thanks I will let you know how it works out. Kind regards Benedict White --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Downlo

Re: [AMaViS-user] Dual Core vs Dual Xeons?

On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 21:38 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Has anyone looked at a SA/AMAVIS/mysql setup with dual core vs dual > Xeons? I wasn't going to answer, because I don't know how much I *don't* know about his, but seeing as no one has I'll give it a shot. Intel's implementation of dual

[AMaViS-user] (!!) TROUBLE in process_request: Undefined subroutine &Amavis::Util::check_tempdir called at /usr/local/sbin/amavisd line 1846

amavis[60183]: (60183-01) Passed BAD-HEADER, [127.0.0.1] -> , quarantine: badh-I7OqU+8+b9Ef, mail_id: I7OqU+8+b9Ef, Hits: 2.728, 2410 ms amavis[60183]: (60183-01) (!!) TROUBLE in process_request: Undefined subroutine &Amavis::Util::check_tempdir called at /usr/local/sbin/amavisd line 1846 amavis[

Re: [AMaViS-user] Does SpamAssassin know about message recipients?

Paolo, > BUT I wonder: does SA (through amavisd-new) know about actual message > recipient(s) - per-SMTP envelope - ? It doesn't. There is no API mechanism to pass recipients from caller to SA. Mark --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Nee

Re: [AMaViS-user] Does SpamAssassin know about message recipients?

On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 16:49 +0200, Paolo Cravero as2594 wrote: > I'm looking into writing a SA plugin that checks message recipients > against an LDAP server and assigns extra score for non-existing address. Why? You should reject mail to unknow recipients at smtp level. This is surely much les

[AMaViS-user] RELEASED amavisd-new-2.4.1

Version 2.4.1 of amavisd-new has been released: http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-2.4.1.tar.gz The 2.4.1 is a maintenance release over 2.4.0. A quick overview of changes: Inserts address extensions at tag2 level instead of at kill level, reverting a 2.4.0 change. No longer rep

[AMaViS-user] Forged yahoo received?

Not likely. Got these headers in autoack from email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I remember a lot of discussion on keeping up with yahoo.com relay servers. Maybe all SA users should just put score FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 0 in local.cf to turn it off? If we are using domain keys and SPF, that should do it, righ

Re: [AMaViS-user] Multiple recipients causing soft-whitelisted to count multiple times

Mark Martinec wrote: Adam, Since it seems as client_address is getting set then would I just need to set the above and not set interface_policy since milter config is not based on ports? This would solve most of my issues if this works. Most of the bypassing needs to be done for hosts that I

[AMaViS-user] Does SpamAssassin know about message recipients?

Hi, I'm looking into writing a SA plugin that checks message recipients against an LDAP server and assigns extra score for non-existing address. (We cannot implement this check at Postfix-MTA level because our users are listed on two separate servers and some are 100% outsourced) Unfortunate