Stuart Johnston wrote:
> Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm moving our content filtering from the frontend smtp-servers to an
>> inside relay. After a test, I can see that while it seems to work ok,
>> all spam is marked "Spam from local .
>>
>> How can I tell amavisd to ignore our in
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Pablo L. Arturi
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 7:57 PM
> To: Michael Scheidell; amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] what how ...
>
>
> ---
>|
>
>
> >Usually three.
> >One FE server (postfix, DNS, mysql, DCC flood server if you use DCC.
> >Anything over 100,000 per day they want you to run your own flood
> >server.
> >
> >Two load balancing servers with amavis/sa/clamav. Postfix transport to
> >send to a dns name (let dns round robin the BE s
> -Original Message-
> From: Pablo L. Arturi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 7:43 PM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] what how ...
>
>
> > Is that 280.000 NON-SPAM? What is the number INCLUDING SPAM?
> (maybe 400.000? About 86% spam ratio?)
>
> Is that 280.000 NON-SPAM? What is the number INCLUDING SPAM?
(maybe 400.000? About 86% spam ratio?)
> I think that 280.000 includes everything, spam and good messages. The
amount of accounts are 17.000 (16 messages per account, per day?).
> You looking at doing this on one big box or multiple s
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Pablo L. Arturi
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 5:51 PM
> To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [AMaViS-user] what how ...
>
>
> Hello dear list.
>
> I have to deploy a spam and antivirus
Hello dear list.
I have to deploy a spam and antivirus system for a large email system. My
idea is to setup postfix+mysql+amavis-new+clamav+sa to work as a email
filtering gateway. I have this numbers:
Email accounts: 18000
Messajes received daily: 280.000
It could not be so much for someone, b
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm moving our content filtering from the frontend smtp-servers to an
> inside relay. After a test, I can see that while it seems to work ok,
> all spam is marked "Spam from local .
>
> How can I tell amavisd to ignore our incoming servers and report the
Terry wrote:
> I have seen a few things about this in my searches but no concrete
> answers and fixes. I am sure it is a configuration error on my part
> but I don't see where. I am getting negative hit scores for spam
> messages. Please reply with information that I can post that would
> help
Terry wrote:
> I have seen a few things about this in my searches but no concrete
> answers and fixes. I am sure it is a configuration error on my part
> but I don't see where. I am getting negative hit scores for spam
> messages. Please reply with information that I can post that would
> help
I have seen a few things about this in my searches but no concrete
answers and fixes. I am sure it is a configuration error on my part
but I don't see where. I am getting negative hit scores for spam
messages. Please reply with information that I can post that would
help resolve this issue.
Th
I would like add to the amavisd-new SQL-storage in order to record the
spam tests that a message hit. This would be so that I can track how
often certain rules are hitting. Has anyone done this and would like to
share their implementation?
Thanks,
Stuart Johnston
___
We have a problem that we are trying to resolve but are having no luck.
Currently we are using Amavisd-new 2.4.1 which we recently upgraded to. Along
with that we upgraded Postfix and ClamAV. Amavis was an in place upgrade from
2.3.1 and not a fresh install.
Since upgrading, any virus that is
Another way to help test that amavisd-new is writing something to
the headers is to temporarily set $final_spam_destiny = D_PASS; and
make sure you have enabled $sa_spam_subject_tag = '***SPAM*** '; and
send yourself a spam message. You should get the message in your inbox
with the subject line pre
Raul wrote:
> I tried to send the reply yesterday with the result of the search in the
> log file attached in a txt file but it was delayed until moderator approval.
> Sorry for the long message
> Jun 8 17:50:51 unpata amavis[13548]: (13548-09) lookup (local_domains)
=>> true, "doeunp(a)exampl
On 5/30/06, Bartłomiej Syryjczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to release mail from quarantine when the method is set to
> sql:?guzik
Yes it is.
Please read the following documentation pertaining to message release
from quarantine:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.protocol.t
I tried to send the reply yesterday with the result of the search in the
log file attached in a txt file but it was delayed until moderator approval.
Sorry for the long message
Gary V escribió:
> Raul wrote:
>
>
>> The server is a mail gateway that processes all incoming/outgoing mail
>> and t
Clifton Royston wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 01:16:46AM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm moving our content filtering from the frontend smtp-servers to an
>> inside relay. After a test, I can see that while it seems to work ok,
>> all spam is marked "Spam from local .
>>
> Noel Jones wrote:
>At 08:58 AM 6/8/2006, Valentin Schmid - ICSurselva AG wrote:
>
>
>>Unfortunatelly the aliases will be interpreted by postfix
>>after the
>>mailfiltering, so amavisd-new
>>can't select the different policies per user.
>>How do I change this?
>>
>>
>
>Remove the no_addre
19 matches
Mail list logo
