Alexander,
> I got a serious problem with Unicode and Amavis. I'm trying to solve a
> certain problem for about a week, but the problem seems to have been there
> since the first mailserver setup last year. All mail bodies seem to get
> encoded to utf-8, even if explicit not allowed to do so. iso-
Greetings from Switzerland,
I got a serious problem with Unicode and Amavis. I'm trying to solve a certain
problem for about a week, but the problem seems to have been there since the
first mailserver setup last year. All mail bodies seem to get encoded to utf-8,
even if explicit not allowed to
Richard wrote:
> hello all,
> tried googling and check this list, but no clear answer on my issue.
At our company (>>6000 users) we have postfix/amavisd in place on our
> internet mail gateways (works perfect ;-)). As a company policy we block
> a long list of attachments (aka banned filenames
hello all,
tried googling and check this list, but no clear answer on my issue.
At our company (>6000 users) we have postfix/amavisd in place on our
internet mail gateways (works perfect ;-)). As a company policy we block
a long list of attachments (aka banned filenames), works ok.
We have som
You shouldn't be running spamd when using amavisd-new, since it
automatically spawns spamassassin. Just install Mail::SpamAssassin from
CPAN. Also note that many of the local.cf settings get overridden by Amavis.
Tenyo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The question is very ordinaryl but I am l
Hi,
The question is very ordinaryl but I am little confused.
Is it necessary that spamd should be running if one installs
amavisd-new+postfix+clamav+spamassasin ?
Does stopping spamd have any affect on identification of mails as spam ?
Thank you.
-Sysadmin
---
