What are you talking about?
> Let's not debate the defintion of a quarantine. To me, an IMAP Junk
> folder is a quarantine. reviewing my previous post:
Ok...I don't recall debating this with you at all. So this shouldn't be
a problem.
> As a recipient of a lot of "rejection code", I can onl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> you deliver messages tagged as "undesirable" to a quarantine. This may be
>> - a junk folder
>> - spam headers added to message (then MUAs are configured to use these
>> to eithe put the message in a special folder or to just allow user to
>> order messages so that they
Hiya folks.
I've made RPM builds for SUSE 10.1 of the latest amavis-new 2.4.3-rc2.
It'd be nice if someone could make a test run or two, just to verify
that things work as expected.
You'll find them at http://www.norrbring.com/SuSE
--
Anders Norrbring
Norrbring Consulting
--
Xavier wrote:
> Dear all,
> I'm configuring amavisd-new (version 2.4.1) with postfix to filter messages
> against spamassassin and clamav.
> I succeed to configure amavisd-new to filter all messages going on my server.
> Now I'd like to use a exclusion list to prevent amavisd-new filter messag
Dear all,
I'm configuring amavisd-new (version 2.4.1) with postfix to filter messages
against spamassassin and clamav.
I succeed to configure amavisd-new to filter all messages going on my server.
Now I'd like to use a exclusion list to prevent amavisd-new filter messages
that are sent to the
Hi,
I have a mail system based on postfix-2.2.9-1tr + amavisd-new-2.3.3-2tr +
spamassassin running on trustix 3.0.
Amavis is configured to banned all emails containing executables files.
Unfortunately, there is a strange kind of executable that I should let in.
It is a not dangerous archive, but
Hello,
How to filter all attachements but one or two
I have a question about filteing attachements.
I need to pass only specific attacements, eg. pdf, text and jpeg.
Mails with all other attachements should be banned.
I have Amavis 2.2.1 and I use policy bank and 'banned_filename_maps' to
filte
Anders Norrbring skrev:
> Gary V skrev:
>> Anders wrote:
>>
>>> Also, the manual (pdf) gives ambigous information about suspected files,
>>> at some places it lists "SUSPICION" and at other places "SUSPICIOUS", so
>>> my suggestion is to include both in e grep. I guess it would be a good
>>> idea
Mark Martinec skrev:
> Anders,
>
>> Why not go all the way? Kaspersky Antivirus ...
>
> Thanks for all the changes, most of them found their way into -rc2.
>
>> The exit codes listed in the distribution .conf file seems to be a
>> little off, I believe that a password protected or corrupted file
