Jo Rhett wrote:
> I'm seeing these log entries for every message passing through now:
>
> mlfi_eom: ignore unknown amavisd response insheader=0 X-Spam-Flag YES
> ...etc repeat for each header that should be added.
>
> Did you change the interface in some incompatible manner?
Okay, http://www.ijs
Mark Martinec skrev:
> Matt and others,
>
>> When upgrading from 2.4.2 to 2.4.3, I had a problem where I was getting
>> messages such as '451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=11761-01, forwarding
>> FAIL ED: Undefined subroutine &Amavis::cmp_ccat called at ./amavisd line
>> 8853. (in re ply to end of
I'm seeing these log entries for every message passing through now:
mlfi_eom: ignore unknown amavisd response insheader=0 X-Spam-Flag YES
...etc repeat for each header that should be added.
Did you change the interface in some incompatible manner?
---
Mark Martinec wrote:
> One of the goals for 2.4.3 was to polish remaining rough corners
> in coexistence with DomainKeys and DKIM domain-based mail signing.
> More on that at:
> http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-docs.html#dkim
Can we get some DKIM documentation that isn't completely
Matt and others,
> When upgrading from 2.4.2 to 2.4.3, I had a problem where I was getting
> messages such as '451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=11761-01, forwarding
> FAIL ED: Undefined subroutine &Amavis::cmp_ccat called at ./amavisd line
> 8853. (in re ply to end of DATA command))' in my mail l
On Mon, October 2, 2006 4:03 am, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Version amavisd-new-2.4.3 has been released.
>>
>
> It seems to work here (no config change needed)
same here, shut down, copied over, restarted, seems OK
thanks
--
Voytek
--
When upgrading from 2.4.2 to 2.4.3, I had a problem where I was getting
messages such as '451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=11761-01, forwarding FAIL
ED: Undefined subroutine &Amavis::cmp_ccat called at ./amavisd line 8853. (in re
ply to end of DATA command))' in my mail logs.
It appears that cmp_
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Werner Schalk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for all the replys so far. I have made a huge progress so far with only
> 4000 mails left. I tried the script posted on the list as well as the Perl
> one-liner but now I am getting this error message (dozens of times) when
> running amavis
Werner wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for all the replys so far. I have made a huge progress so far with
> only
> 4000 mails left. I tried the script posted on the list as well as the Perl
> one-liner but now I am getting this error message (dozens of times) when
> running amavisd-release:
> 450 4.5.
Clifton wrote:
>> 5). Stop using dspam because it's not worth the hassle.
> That's pretty close to my experience a couple years ago, except that
> I also found that the dspam version I was using completely wedged on
> Berkeley DB files, which it claimed to support, and that before some
> magic
Vladimir wrote:
> Hi all.
> I'm using postfix + amavisd-new-2.4.2 + spamassassin.
> Is there any chance to completely disable the insertion of the
> "X-Spam-Status" header field with all the scores, tests, etc. even if the
> message is considered spam? I only need the "X-Spam-Flag" header field
> s
Hi,
thanks for all the replys so far. I have made a huge progress so far with only
4000 mails left. I tried the script posted on the list as well as the Perl
one-liner but now I am getting this error message (dozens of times) when
running amavisd-release:
450 4.5.0 Failure: SQL quarantine code
Mark Martinec wrote:
> I have not been able to figure out
> if there is a way to tell "sendmail" to use an alternate "pickup"
> daemon when piping a message back to Postfix.
>
>
> I don't think there is a way. Pickup picks messages from a maildrop directory,
> and by the
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 04:53:34PM -0600, Gary V wrote:
> nikss wrote:
> > I am using Exim with amavisd-new + SA + clamav. I figured out option
> > unchecked option $dspam in amavisd.conf but have no clue how to
> > integrate/install DSPAM into my configuration.
> > I havent found any howtos to t
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Vincent Li wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Werner Schalk wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> hhhmm, this is strange. In a bash shell I get:
> ..snip...
>>
>> This is not correct, the directory /var/amavis/quarantine is full of messages
>> like spam-XXX.gz. So how do I have to quote it t
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 05:49:30PM +0100, Werner Schalk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> hhhmm, this is strange. In a bash shell I get:
>
> # find "/var/amavis/quarantine/spam-*" -type f | xargs zgrep '^X-Envelope-To:
> $i' | grep 'mydomain.com' | cut -c 24-43 >>list
> find: /var/amavis/quarantine/spam-*: No su
* Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Version amavisd-new-2.4.3 has been released.
It seems to work here (no config change needed)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame Einricht
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Werner Schalk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> hhhmm, this is strange. In a bash shell I get:
..snip...
>
> This is not correct, the directory /var/amavis/quarantine is full of messages
> like spam-XXX.gz. So how do I have to quote it to get this to work?
>
I wrote one-liner perl scr
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Werner Schalk wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> Now when I execute it, nothing happens (except that he lists the files and
> their X-Envelope-To setting):
>
> # ./amavis.sh
> /var/amavis/quarantine/spam-742mpcNejMVz.gz
> X-Envelope-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> spam-742mpcNejMVz.gz
>
> For so
Hi,
hhhmm, this is strange. In a bash shell I get:
# find "/var/amavis/quarantine/spam-*" -type f | xargs zgrep '^X-Envelope-To:
$i' | grep 'mydomain.com' | cut -c 24-43 >>list
find: /var/amavis/quarantine/spam-*: No such file or directory
# find '/var/amavis/quarantine/spam-*' -type f | xargs
Hehe.. I just got a funny message from the sourceforge mailman.. :)
Your mail to 'AMaViS-user' with the subject
Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd-new-2.4.3 RELEASED
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Message has a suspicious head
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 03:52:34PM +0100, Werner Schalk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > find /var/amavis/quarantine/spam* -type f | xargs .
>
> this doesn't work either for some reason (8000 files might be too many?):
>
> # find /var/amavis/quarantine/spam* -type f | xargs zgrep '^X-Envelope-To:
> $i' | gre
Mark Martinec skrev:
> Version amavisd-new-2.4.3 has been released.
> It is available at:
>
> http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-2.4.3.tar.gz
And now there are SUSE 10.1 RPMs available for i586 and x86_64, you'll
find them at ftp://ftp.norrbring.com/pub/linux/inst-source
That URL i
Hi,
> find /var/amavis/quarantine/spam* -type f | xargs .
this doesn't work either for some reason (8000 files might be too many?):
# find /var/amavis/quarantine/spam* -type f | xargs zgrep '^X-Envelope-To:
$i' | grep 'mydomain.com' | cut -c 24-43 >>list
-bash: /usr/bin/find: Argument list too
Hi,
thanks a lot for all the responses, you guys are very kind! Gary V, I copied
your script to my server as follows:
-
#!/bin/bash
# feeds local quarantined mail to amavisd-release for a given domain.
# please insure the same mail does not get quarantined again.
# assumes sp
Gary wrote:
> I'm sure you have already solved the problem, but if you would like,
> here is a script that appears to work for me. I'm not a shell
> programmer, and I'm sure it shows. Use at your own risk.
> #!/bin/bash
> # feeds local quarantined mail to amavisd-release for a given domain.
> # p
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 02:26:51PM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Maybe its just me, but SpamAssassin only "works" for me. If I would use
> SpamAssassin, I
> would still get ~5-10 spam messages per day.
Hard to say without knowing your configuration or experience..
> With DSPAM, I only get 1-3
Henrik Krohns wrote:
> Any system that requires feedback from the users is flaved IMO. I'm sure
> our workers have better things to do than train bayes. We just use a global
> autolearning database, and in our case it works even better as we don't
> communicate in english.
IMHO this is a weak arg
Heinz Ulrich Stille wrote:
> My only (small) gripe against dspam is that it insists on delivering
> one message to each receiver separately (via LMTP) instead of handing
> it over to the next filter step "as is".
It depends on the parameters used to call DSPAM. If you are using --stdout,
DSPAM w
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 01:25:57PM +0200, Heinz Ulrich Stille wrote:
>
> (..message trimmed..)
>
> > 4). Discover that it only works well if you constantly manually feed it.
>
> Well, yes, but in my experience any filter needs constant training.
>
> > 5). Stop using dspam because it's not worth t
On Friday 29 September 2006 00:53, Gary V wrote:
> 1). Spend time and effort understanding how dspam works and how
> to install it. Experiment with different storage methods in order
> to find the one that is fastest (because dspam moves like molasses
> on large messages).
Hmm... dspam seem
31 matches
Mail list logo
