We have been having an issue with our Postfix mail server running
amavis-new with SpamAssassin and ClamAV, in that mail is either not
delivered or seriously delayed (more than 3 days at times). I noticed
the following error in my mail log:
Oct 23 22:24:12 dencoit03 postfix/smtp[13567] : connect to
On Oct 23, 2006, at 9:54 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Jo Rhett writes:
>> By default the configuration says that x-msdownload is a bad header.
>> Comment out that line from the configuration.
>
> Wrong answer. x-msdownload could be a banned component of a message,
> but is not a bad header. Bad hea
On Oct 23, 2006, at 7:12 AM, Peter Huetmannsberger wrote:
> I run a daily cronjob as user amavis with the following command line:
> /usr/bin/sa-update --updatedir /usr/share/spamassassin/ --gpghomedir \
> /var/amavis/
>
> You have to make sure that amvais can write in /usr/share/
> spamassassin,
John,
> I'm preparing a specfile for amavisd-new 2.4.3 on SuSE and I not sure what
> the minimal requirement of Perl::Net::Server is for use with
> Amavisd-new-2.4.3. My current 2.3.3 setup is running happely with
> perl::Net::Server 0.88. Is this suffient for Amavisd-new 2.4.3 (Postfix /
> non mi
Hello list,
I'm preparing a specfile for amavisd-new 2.4.3 on SuSE and I not sure what
the minimal requirement of Perl::Net::Server is for use with
Amavisd-new-2.4.3. My current 2.3.3 setup is running happely with
perl::Net::Server 0.88. Is this suffient for Amavisd-new 2.4.3 (Postfix /
non mi
Rocco,
> Amavisd-new goes in error after a few time that it starts..
Process amavisd or process amavis-milter? Looks like the later.
> After raising verbosity of amavis-milter I have seen the following
> entries in milter logs:
>
> Oct 23 18:59:51 av3 amavis-milter[4149]: amavis-milter: thread_
Mike,
> Here is another bad-header message - hopefully in one piece and complete.
This one looks fine (after unfolding the two wrapped header lines), and
doesn't bring any complaints from my amavisd/MIME::Parser (version 5.420).
Which version of MIME::Parser do you have (it is logged at amavisd
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 03:09:07PM -0400, Mark Burdick wrote:
> When message is finally delivered to jsmith, it *appears* to be from
> something like "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Yet, this information isn't
> inside the message itself.
This sounds like a common MTA configuration issue. The mail comes
Johan,
> Just checked the logs and it seems to be Postfix (see log below).
> It arrives with a size of 817019 and later in the log (before it is handed
> over to Amavis) is has a size of 7298...!
> I looks that my disclaimer script is screwing the mail.
> What puzzles me also that there are the tw
Francisco wrote:
> Hello folks:
> I have been checking the headers of a few of the spam emails that have
> been getting through as well as the headers of some reliable source
> emails that are coming through and for some reason in both of these
> cases it seems like these emails are not being giv
At 02:09 PM 10/23/2006, Mark Burdick wrote:
>Hi, all...
>
>I have been having an odd problem with a couple of servers
>running
>AMAVISD, and am looking for some insight/guidance. I have
>been receiving
>(intermittently, but often in "bunches") SPAM that
>*claims* to be from a
>user on the host t
Hi, all...
I have been having an odd problem with a couple of servers running
AMAVISD, and am looking for some insight/guidance. I have been receiving
(intermittently, but often in "bunches") SPAM that *claims* to be from a
user on the host that is actually processing the mail. This supposed
F
Mark,
On Mon, October 23, 2006 11:54 am, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Jo Rhett writes:
> Your first sample came across somewhat mangled (adjecent header fields
> joined and wrapped), but as far I can tell, it is missing the
> final "--=_20061019092239_46584--" line.
Here is another bad-header messa
Op maandag 23 oktober 2006 20:08, schreef Mark Martinec:
> Johan,
>
> > Lately very often our users complain that they have received an email
> > without an attachment.
> > When i check the logs i can't find any error/warning messages except for
> > a BAD-HEADER message (which i let pass by default
Sorry..
It Was a my error while starting amavisd-new (I've commented the name of socket
where amavis-milter have to bind..)
Sorry again..
rocsca
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto
> di Rocco Scappatura
> Inviato: lunedì 23 ottobre
Hello,
I get the following error..
Oct 23 20:08:36 av3 sendmail[30415]: k9NI8aeJ030415: Milter
(milter-amavis): local socket name /var/amavis/amavis-milter.sock unsafe
Oct 23 20:08:36 av3 sendmail[30415]: k9NI8aeJ030415: Milter
(milter-amavis): to error state
What I can be?
Thanks,
rocsca
--
Johan,
> Lately very often our users complain that they have received an email
> without an attachment.
> When i check the logs i can't find any error/warning messages except for a
> BAD-HEADER message (which i let pass by default).
> In the beginning i told the users that the email arrived with a
Hi all,
Running:
SuSE10.0
Postfix 2.2.5-5
Amavis-new 2.3.3-5
ClamAv 0.88.5-0.1
Lately very often our users complain that they have received an email without
an attachment.
When i check the logs i can't find any error/warning messages except for a
BAD-HEADER message (which i let pass by defaul
Hello,
Amavisd-new goes in error after a few time that it starts..
After raising verbosity of amavis-milter I have seen the following
entries in milter logs:
Oct 23 18:59:51 av3 amavis-milter[4149]: amavis-milter: thread_create()
failed: 11, try again
What it means? It is this the cause of my
Wayne,
> I ran into the lmtp bug with 2.4.2 (and hence had a lot of spam messages
> queued for bouncing). Upgraded to 2.4.3 and that issue is gone
Yes, there was a bug in LMTP processing in 2.4.2.
> but it would appear now that the
> folks who score low enough for us to send the extremely rare
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:01:04AM +0200, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's many days that rule do jour try to update rules of spamassassin bat
> without success..
The rulesemporium domain missed renewal for a day or two, and briefly
was replaced by a domain squatter. As a result you hav
Hello folks:
I have been checking the headers of a few of the spam emails that have
been getting through as well as the headers of some reliable source
emails that are coming through and for some reason in both of these
cases it seems like these emails are not being given a score, these are
the he
Jo Rhett writes:
> By default the configuration says that x-msdownload is a bad header.
> Comment out that line from the configuration.
Wrong answer. x-msdownload could be a banned component of a message,
but is not a bad header. Bad headers are those violating RFC2822 or
MIME structure (MIME::Pa
Jose,
> By filtering I mean the spam lover's messages are being deposited in
> the quarantine directory.
>
> I've spoken with the person involved and they say they're receiving
> more spam (and loving it). But I haven't compared his messages in
> the quarantine directory to his delivered messages
Rocco Scappatura schrieb:
> I don't understand. Could you explain better? Tnx
---
error-message:
> Lint output: [6587] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";>
> [6587]
John,
> So after sa-update I should also execute an /etc/init.d/amavisd
> restart and I'm fine?
Yes. (or 'amavisd reload')
Mark
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done q
"Mark Martinec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> John,
Mark,
Thanx for the quick response
>> I'm confused on how Amavisd-new and Spamassassin sa-update interact.
>> There are several previous posts that didn't clear things by me.
>> Versions: SA 3.1.7, Amavisd-new
Peter,
> I am not sure, taht what I do is correct, but then who cares if it works.
> I run a daily cronjob as user amavis with the following command line:
> /usr/bin/sa-update --updatedir /usr/share/spamassassin/ --gpghomedir \
> /var/amavis/
I've been doing this initially, but people on SA list
John,
> I'm confused on how Amavisd-new and Spamassassin sa-update interact.
> There are several previous posts that didn't clear things by me.
> Versions: SA 3.1.7, Amavisd-new 2.3.3
These versions are fine, sa-update should work out of the box,
no special options or actions are needed, just le
"Peter Huetmannsberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, John wrote:
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I'm confused on how Amavisd-new and Spamassassin sa-update interact.
>> There
>> are several previous posts that didn't clear things by me.
>> Versions
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, John wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I'm confused on how Amavisd-new and Spamassassin sa-update interact. There
> are several previous posts that didn't clear things by me.
> Versions:
> SA 3.1.7
> Amavisd-new 2.3.3
> Should I include the updated rules in /etc/spamassasin/local.cf
Hello list,
I'm confused on how Amavisd-new and Spamassassin sa-update interact. There
are several previous posts that didn't clear things by me.
Versions:
SA 3.1.7
Amavisd-new 2.3.3
Should I include the updated rules in /etc/spamassasin/local.cf as mentioned
in the SA website?
include /var/lib
Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:50:21PM -0400, Ricardo Stella ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>
>
>> I've been pushing for some time to get up-to-date and valid user
>> listsings autoupdated for some time, but it's been way to slow...
>> The thing was that allowing only vali
Hmm,
thank you for your help, but I am afraid, I am still using sendmail with
the milter setup, so that doesn't do it for me.
Thanks again,
.peter
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Peter,
>
> > This morning it dawned on me, that every rejected spam creates a
> > legitimate (pa
Peter,
> This morning it dawned on me, that every rejected spam creates a
> legitimate (passed clean) mail, i.e. the one sent to the spam-admin
> notifying me of spam being quarantined.
> This changes the picture completely and makes the numbers look more than
> 80% spam and 20 % real mails.
>
> M
Christophe,
> I use amavis-new-2.4.3 on a classic postfix-linux box, all SPAM are well
> tagged and combination with DCC, razor, and pyzor works fine too. All Works
> fine except mails which are rewritted ( in case of forwarding mail which
> postfix canonical) are not tagged, and so I relay some s
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 11:01 +0200, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's many days that rule do jour try to update rules of spamassassin bat
> without success..
rulesemporium.com let their domain lapse, and you have probably cached
bad data before they got their domain re-registered. I find
Hello,
> failed to
> > parse line, skipping:
>
> a guess: it seems u have copied and pasted some wrong lines, your
> config is broken?
>
It does not seem to me..
> >
> >
> > Can someone give me an hint about how to solve this problem?
>
> Show your rulesdujour config?
Here my simple
Sorry,
> > /etc/mail/spamassassin # spamassassin -D -lint [28005] warn: The -l
> > option has been deprecated and is no longer supported, ignoring.
>
> spamassassin -D --lint
>^^
> u forgot one "-"
>
You're right..
Here my output..
/etc/mail/spamassassi
massassin --lint failed.
> > Rolling configuration files back, not restarting SpamAssassin.
> > Rollback command is: mv -f /etc/mail/spamassassin/tripwire.cf
> > /tmp/RulesDuJour/99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf.2; mv -f
> > /tmp/RulesDuJour/tripwire.cf.20061023-1005
> > /etc/m
On 10/23/06, Peter Huetmannsberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My question is therefore. Is there a way to leave the mails form spamalert
> to spam-police out of the statistics, to create a truer picture of the
> ratio spam:ham mails?
are you talking about this amavis-stats ?
http://rekudos.net/
Voytek,
> FWIW, I've installed FuzzyOCR maybe 2 or 3 weeks ago, I think... it
> sometimes works, though, I don't get the same results as README/samples
> suggest
>
> so, perhaps, GIF block is a better alternative...
Hard blocking may be too harsh, some mailing lists and company mail
add logos
Rocco Scappatura schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I have tried to run SA with debug option to get some further insight, but
> commands does not return:
>
> /etc/mail/spamassassin # spamassassin -D -lint
> [28005] warn: The -l option has been deprecated and is no longer supported,
> ignoring.
spamassassin
ssin.
> Rollback command is: mv -f /etc/mail/spamassassin/tripwire.cf
> /tmp/RulesDuJour/99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf.2; mv -f
> /tmp/RulesDuJour/tripwire.cf.20061023-1005
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/tripwire.cf; mv -f
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/bogus-virus-warnings.cf
> /tmp/RulesDuJour/bogus-v
It's many days that rule do jour try to update rules of
> spamassassin bat without success..
>
> Here the output...
>
> ***WARNING***: spamassassin --lint failed.
> Rolling configuration files back, not restarting SpamAssassin.
> Rollback command is: mv -f /etc/mail/spamassassin/tr
/tmp/RulesDuJour/99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf.2; mv -f
/tmp/RulesDuJour/tripwire.cf.20061023-1005
/etc/mail/spamassassin/tripwire.cf; mv -f
/etc/mail/spamassassin/bogus-virus-warnings.cf
/tmp/RulesDuJour/bogus-virus-warnings.cf.2; mv -f
/tmp/RulesDuJour/bogus-virus-warnings.cf.20061023-1005
/etc/mail/spamass
On 10/22/06, techlist06 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am already tagging potential spam. Is there a relatively easy way I can
> tag messages with the image spam, specifically the gif/animated gif's as
> spam? I considered blocking them altogether, but figured that might be too
> drastic. I'd li
Hello,
Sorry to ask here, but it seems to be the most appropriate place for it.
When looking at my statistics I noticed that the number of spams is always
lower than the number of passed clean emails. I was happy with this fo
rthe longest time, despite the feeling that something is not quite
48 matches
Mail list logo
