Hi Mark,
>> Jan 10 09:44:42 panther amavis[16260]: (26708-17) (!!)run_command: child
>> process [16260]: Can't open /dev/null: Permission denied at /.../amavisd
>> line 2354.
>
>> At the time that this happened, /dev/null was showing permissions of
>> 0660.
>> A "temporary fix" (and the one I emp
Le 11 janv. 07 à 21:50, Gary V a écrit :
> Gary wrote:
>
>> Just digging...
>> Are these messages addressed to multiple recipients?
>
> Sorry, I see that at least this one is.
> What does your MYNETS policy bank look like?
>
$policy_bank{'MYNETS'} = { # mail originating from @mynetworks
term
Le 11 janv. 07 à 20:47, Gary V a écrit :
> bsd wrote:
>
>> We will catch this 'bug' this time, It has been around for too long !
>> Do you have any clue ?
>
> Just digging...
> Are you still using 2.2.1? Are these messages addressed to multiple
> recipients?
amavisd-new-2.4.4,1 = up-to-
Le 11 janv. 07 à 20:39, Mark Martinec a écrit :
> - just to make certain: the version of amavisd-new is 2.4.4
> and comes from ports?
>
amavisd-new-2.4.4,1 = up-to-date with port
> - make doubly sure the subject tag was not already present on
> incoming mail;
> the to-level log e
Gary wrote:
> Just digging...
> Are these messages addressed to multiple recipients?
Sorry, I see that at least this one is.
What does your MYNETS policy bank look like?
> Jan 11 15:44:53 ns2 amavis[52433]: (52433-28) Passed CLEAN,
> [193.51.206.66] [212.157.42.163] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->
> <[
bsd wrote:
> We will catch this 'bug' this time, It has been around for too long !
> Do you have any clue ?
Just digging...
Are you still using 2.2.1? Are these messages addressed to multiple
recipients? Are you using SQL or LDAP where different users may have
different settings? There was a bug
- just to make certain: the version of amavisd-new is 2.4.4
and comes from ports?
- make doubly sure the subject tag was not already present on incoming mail;
the to-level log entry can include original Subject string in the log
entry, uncomment the line (remove first #) near the end of file
Le 11 janv. 07 à 17:41, Mark Martinec a écrit :
>> Some mail are tagged as Spam (in the header) BUT are not considered
>> as spam when we have a look at amavisd log ??
>> They seemed to be marked as non spam mail.
>
> The choice between 'CLEAN' and 'SPAM' in the "Passed CLEAN" log entry
> is deter
Le 11 janv. 07 à 17:18, bsd a écrit :
> Hello,
>
>
> We are facing a very weired situation, our mail server (10K mails /
> day) is deployed with amavisd-new + postfix (FreeBSD latest release).
>
> Some mail are tagged as Spam (in the header)
In fact we tag them in the subject.
> BUT are not con
> Some mail are tagged as Spam (in the header) BUT are not considered
> as spam when we have a look at amavisd log ??
> They seemed to be marked as non spam mail.
The choice between 'CLEAN' and 'SPAM' in the "Passed CLEAN" log entry
is determined by kill_level of recipients (if any recipient of th
bsd wrote:
> Hello,
> We are facing a very weired situation, our mail server (10K mails /
> day) is deployed with amavisd-new + postfix (FreeBSD latest release).
> Some mail are tagged as Spam (in the header) BUT are not considered
> as spam when we have a look at amavisd log ??
> They seeme
Hello,
We are facing a very weired situation, our mail server (10K mails /
day) is deployed with amavisd-new + postfix (FreeBSD latest release).
Some mail are tagged as Spam (in the header) BUT are not considered
as spam when we have a look at amavisd log ??
They seemed to be marked as non
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:amavis-user-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Martinec
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 1:53 AM
> To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Rejected count is wrong with mailgraph
>
> Leon,
>
> > I'm m
13 matches
Mail list logo
