Kasscie,
> i have use amavis-new for redirector ?
Although you can probably hack the amavisd code to turn it into
a mail redirector (after all, it is a SMTP server and client,
and has existing code to modify recipient addresses or add additional
recipients to a message, as well as to check mail
Sorry guys . wrong mailing list ... forgive me.
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães escreveu:
>Hi Guys,
>
>Im having another problem with clamd 0.90 dying
>
>I'm not using update scripts, tough i do have a script that runs and
> grab a clamav-format malware database file
i have use amavis-new for redirector ?
I need send sms when user receive new post office already, the application
this done and as amavis is able to review subject from and all that I need
to know how if amavis podria to redirect my application to equal since it
does with spammassin, clamv
or y
Hello,
recently I started to play with Amavisd-new as before-queue proxyfilter
for Postfix, mostly successful. One problem though appeared because
amavisd-new rejected mails from one listserver.
Feb 27 22:47:41 katgar postfix/smtpd[8122]: setting up TLS connection from
LISTS2.andrew.cmu.edu[128.2
Hi Guys,
Im having another problem with clamd 0.90 dying
I'm not using update scripts, tough i do have a script that runs and
grab a clamav-format malware database file (www.malware.com.br).
When a new definition file is downloaded, the update script issues a
'service clamd r
On Dienstag, 27. Februar 2007 19:16 Mark Martinec wrote:
> - some MUAs (like IncrediMail) don't know how to properly
> fold long header fields, leaving empty lines in a header;
OK, but IncrediMail is ugly and should be filtered anyway *eg*
They have a problem with german/austrian time zones,
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 09:23 -0700, Gary V wrote:
> I used to think it was free, then one day a link to the product page
> stated explicitly that this product was for workstations and could not
> be used on a server.
At my old company we purchased BitDefender for Postfix, which is a
server licence.
Frank Abel,
> Why I see a comment after the "$final_bad_header_destiny" that say:
> "# False-positive prone (for spam)".
Where did you see it? It is not in the distribution I believe.
> I mean... I suppose that if an email
> have a bad header is a bad email (or at least a bad structured email)
Hi all!
Why I see a comment after the "$final_bad_header_destiny" that say: "#
False-positive prone (for spam)". I mean... I suppose that if an email
have a bad header is a bad email (or at least a bad structured email).
What is the reason that most people put "D_PASS" as value of that
variabl
Rodrigo wrote:
> When I send an e-mail with the character "ç" in the subject from my
> Yahoo e-mail, Amavis scrambles the hole e-mail with confusing
> characters. For example "teste de formatação" turns "teste de
> formatação" in the subject and in the body also.
Quite possibly:
http://marc.the
When I send an e-mail with the character "ç" in the subject from my
Yahoo e-mail, Amavis scrambles the hole e-mail with confusing
characters. For example "teste de formatação" turns "teste de
formatação" in the subject and in the body also.
I'm using Posrfix 2.3.4 with Amavisd-new 2.4.4
I tryie
New version 1.4 of sophos-ide-update is available from:
http://www.ijs.si/software/sophos-ide-update/
sophos-ide-update is a Perl program to carefully update
virus signature .ide files from the Sophos web server,
and optionally restart Sophie if .ide files were changed.
Changes from 1.3 to 1.4
I found this in the amavisd source:
# attempt to read all user-visible replies from a l10n dir
# This function auto-fills $notify_sender_templ,
$notify_virus_sender_templ,
# $notify_virus_admin_templ, $notify_virus_recips_templ,
# $notify_spam_sender_templ and $notify_spam_admin_templ from files
Manish,
> I am actually trying to find amavisd configuration options to achieve
> this, if there are any. I will again explain what I need to do.
> Instead of quarantining the detected spam in a directory, I pass it on
> to an email id ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that the mails can be examined
> for
On 2/27/07, Matthias Haegele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manish Kathuria schrieb:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi!
>
> > I am using amavisd-new along with Postifx for a number of virtual
> > domains on the same host. Currently, I am redirecting the detected
> > spam for all the domains to a single account ([EMA
Sorry guys,
after several hours staring at the problem, I just found the problem:
>> --8BFB1D6001F9748054F2C3412980690B
>> Just a simple test e-mail.
>>
>> --8BFB1D6001F9748054F2C3412980690B
Due to the empty line at the end, the original text is interpreted as email
header and in thi
Hi all,
my amavis installation detects a bad header in S/MIME signed emails if the text
part has no Content-Type header.
I'm getting this message in my dsn:
> The message WAS NOT relayed to:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>554 5.6.0 Reject, id=06568-01 - BAD_HEADER: MIME error: error: couldn't
>
Dear list,
I recently changed our amavis settings, so that spams are now defanged:
$defang_spam = 1;
This causes spam to have such text:
Spam detection software, running on the system "protegate5.zmi.at", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attac
Manish Kathuria schrieb:
> Hello,
Hi!
> I am using amavisd-new along with Postifx for a number of virtual
> domains on the same host. Currently, I am redirecting the detected
> spam for all the domains to a single account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) which
> is monitored and scanned for false positives. S
19 matches
Mail list logo
