Bill wrote:
>> The FILTER action only replaces the current content_filter setting
>> and does not stop processing restrictions. Multiple FILTER
>> actions can all stick their value into a content_filter
>> one after another, whatever remains there when some restriction
>> finally does terminate pr
Mark Martinec wrote the following on 5/10/2007 4:27 PM -0800:
> On Friday May 11 2007 00:51:14 Bill Landry wrote:
>
>> So explain a situation where the first filter would *not* apply. As
>> written, it applies to everything and anything after
>> "check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/filter_out
Bill Landry wrote:
> Jeremy Laidman wrote the following on 5/10/2007 3:40 PM -0800:
>
>> Bill Landry wrote:
>>
>>
>>
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
...
check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/filter_outbound
permit_mynetworks
per
On Friday May 11 2007 00:51:14 Bill Landry wrote:
> So explain a situation where the first filter would *not* apply. As
> written, it applies to everything and anything after
> "check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/filter_outbound" is useless, as
> everything will be sent to the first content_fil
Jeremy Laidman wrote the following on 5/10/2007 3:40 PM -0800:
> Bill Landry wrote:
>
>
>>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>>> ...
>>> check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/filter_outbound
>>> permit_mynetworks
>>> permit_sasl_authenticated
>>> check_c
Bill Landry wrote:
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>> ...
>> check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/filter_outbound
>> permit_mynetworks
>> permit_sasl_authenticated
>> check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/filter_inbound
>> reject_unauth_destin
Gary V wrote the following on 5/10/2007 2:31 PM -0800:
> Bill wrote:
>
>
>> Gary V wrote the following on 5/10/2007 2:21 PM -0800:
>>
>>> Bill wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
mouss wrote the following on 5/10/2007 1:26 PM -0800:
> it is recommended to pass outb
Bill wrote:
> Gary V wrote the following on 5/10/2007 2:21 PM -0800:
>> Bill wrote:
>>
>>
>>> mouss wrote the following on 5/10/2007 1:26 PM -0800:
>>>
it is recommended to pass outbound mail through a virus checker. one way
to do this is to tell amavisd-new to listen on two por
Gary V wrote the following on 5/10/2007 2:21 PM -0800:
> Bill wrote:
>
>
>> mouss wrote the following on 5/10/2007 1:26 PM -0800:
>>
>>> it is recommended to pass outbound mail through a virus checker. one way
>>> to do this is to tell amavisd-new to listen on two ports (10024 and
>>> 105
Bill wrote:
> mouss wrote the following on 5/10/2007 1:26 PM -0800:
>> it is recommended to pass outbound mail through a virus checker. one way
>> to do this is to tell amavisd-new to listen on two ports (10024 and
>> 10586 for instance) and use
>> ... FILTER amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10586
>> for
mouss wrote the following on 5/10/2007 1:26 PM -0800:
> it is recommended to pass outbound mail through a virus checker. one way
> to do this is to tell amavisd-new to listen on two ports (10024 and
> 10586 for instance) and use
> ... FILTER amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10586
> for outbound mail (myne
Martin Schiøtz wrote:
> On 5/10/07, Jeremy Laidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Martin Schiøtz wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Is it possible with postfix only to send incoming mails to amavisd-new
>>> and outgoing mails without configuring two ip-addresses on the server?
>>>
>> I think you're a
On 5/10/07, Jeremy Laidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Schiøtz wrote:
>
> > Is it possible with postfix only to send incoming mails to amavisd-new
> > and outgoing mails without configuring two ip-addresses on the server?
>
> I think you're asking if outbound mails can bypass amavis.
>
> Ye
Martin Schiøtz wrote:
> Is it possible with postfix only to send incoming mails to amavisd-new
> and outgoing mails without configuring two ip-addresses on the server?
I think you're asking if outbound mails can bypass amavis.
Yes you can. Assuming second postfix is listening on localhost port
Hi list,
I have activated amavisd-new/clamAV with exim 4.6x.
It works very good for incomming messages, but all
outgoing messages will not be scanned through amavisd.
My entries for exim.conf looks like written in the
docs:
[...]
local_interfaces = 0.0.0.0.25 : 127.0.0.1.10025
amavis_router:
Hi
Is it possible with postfix only to send incoming mails to amavisd-new
and outgoing mails without configuring two ip-addresses on the server?
If this is possible can I then use the
'lmtp_send_xforward_command=yes' functionality or similar for outgoing
mails (pen pals functionality with amavisd
16 matches
Mail list logo
